Language selection

Search

Minister of Foreign Affairs appearance before the Committee of the Whole – Issues notes – Briefing material

2021-12-07/08

Table of contents

  1. International Trade (Mary Ng)
    1. Potato Wart in Prince Edward Island
    2. U.S. Electric Vehicles Tax Credit
    3. Dairy TRQs – CUSMA panel dispute settlement
    4. Softwood Lumber
  2. International Development
    1. Canada’s International Assistance Response to COVID-19
    2. Afghanistan
    3. Assistance to China
    4. WTO TRIPS Agreement Waiver Proposal
    5. UNRWA
  3. National Defence (Anita Anand)
    1. Supplementary Estimates (B) - Canadian Forces Pay Increase - Vote 1b (operating expenditures)
    2. Supplementary Estimates (B) - Heyder and Beattie class actions final settlement agreement – Vote 1b (operating expenditures), Vote 5b (capital expenditures)
    3. Supplementary Estimates (B) - Expanded contributions to NATO – Vote 10b (grants and contributions)
    4. Culture Change
    5. Future Fighter Capability Project (FFCP)
    6. Operation UNIFIER (Ukraine)- CAF’s mission to support the Security Forces of Ukraine
  4. Veterans Affairs (Lawrence MacAulay)
    1. Supplementary Estimates (B)
    2. Disability Processing Times and Action Plan
    3. Support for Military Sexual Misconduct Survivors
    4. Veterans Affairs Canada Case Management
  5. Communications Security Establishment (Anita Anand)
    1. Supplementary Estimates (B)
  6. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (Ginette Petitpas-Taylor)
    1. Supplementary Estimates (B)
    2. ACOA Programming Update and Key Sectors
    3. COVID Support Update
  7. Canadian North Economic Development Agency (Dan Vandal)
    1. Supplementary Estimates (B) - CanNor Tourism Recovery Strategy
  8. Economic Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec (Pascale St-Onge)
    1. Supplementary Estimates (B)
    2. Contribution to the economic recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic
    3. Achievements of Canada Economic Development for Quebec regions
    4. Measures and programs in response to COVID-19

International Trade (Mary Ng)

Potato Wart in Prince Edward Island

Supplementary messages

Background

On October 1 and October 14, 2021, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) confirmed the detection of the potato wart fungus, Synchytrium endobioticum, a reportable regulated pest, in two separate fields of processing potatoes on two separate farms. The fields are related to previous potato wart detections, and have been under surveillance as per the Potato Wart Domestic Long Term Management Plan. Both potato farms are located in Prince Edward Island.

On November 21, 2021, a Ministerial Order was issues by Minister Bibeau under the authority of the Plant Protection Act. The Order restricts the sale of seed potatoes from PEI to the rest of Canada and the United States. Canada can continue to export potatoes to non-U.S. countries in specific cases if requirements for the importing countries can be met. Exports of PEI table stock and processing potatoes to the U.S. are suspended while risk and risk management measures are being reviewed. This does not apply to processed PEI potatoes, such as frozen potatoes. The Order will also enable the development of certification programs to support affected industries in PEI and ensure that regulated commodities are certified to mitigate concerns related to potato wart.

Reactions to the Order were negative in PEI, both from industry stakeholders and politicians, including PEI’s Premier Dennis King, who argued that the Order goes against the acceptable science and protocols and is being made to appease the United States.

While Canada notified its CUSMA partners of the detection of potato wart in line with established transparency practices, the Government of Canada’s actions to restrict trade were its own and not a consequence of CUSMA commitments.

In 2020, PEI exported $121.6 million in fresh potatoes. The majority of those exports were table and processing potatoes ($116.3 million), with seed potato exports being valued at $5.3 million. PEI’s largest potato export category is frozen potatoes, which was valued at $369.2 million in 2019/2020. The Order does not apply to frozen potatoes.

U.S. electric vehicle tax credit

Supplementary messages

Background

The House of Representatives draft of the Build Back Better bill contains tax credits for purchases of electric vehicles in the U.S. that threaten the viability of automotive production in Canada. The proposed credits are inconsistent with U.S. obligations under the CUSMA and WTO and could risk triggering a trade war with U.S. allies, including Canada.

In addition to a maximum base credit of $7,500, a $4,500 credit is provided if final assembly of an electric vehicle takes place at a unionized facility in the United States; an additional $500 credit is provided if the electric vehicle is powered by battery cells that are manufactured in the United States; and, most concerning, beginning in 2027 the full value of the credit (up to $12,500) will be conditional on final assembly of the electric vehicle in the United States.

The House of Representatives must vote on a consolidated draft bill, which if passed, would then be considered by the Senate. Canadian automotive stakeholders are engaged and very concerned. On October 22, you sent Congressional leadership a letter outlining Canada’s serious concerns, on October 26, Ontario Minister Fedeli sent a similar letter on behalf of the province, and on October 29, Ambassador Hillman signed a joint letter from the Ambassadors of the EU and EU Member States, Japan, Korea and Mexico flagging serious concerns.

Dairy TRQs – CUSMA panel dispute settlement

Supplementary messages

Update

The dispute hearing took place on October 25 and 26 in Ottawa. Canada argued that the U.S. is trying to obtain through litigation what it failed to achieve in the negotiations and that the U.S. has misinterpreted and mischaracterized the obligations applicable

to Canada’s dairy market access under CUSMA. Following the hearing, the Panel is expected to issue an interim panel report as soon as late November and a final decision by early January.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Since CUSMA’s coming into force on July 1st, 2020, the U.S. has expressed concerns regarding the administration of Canada’s CUSMA dairy tariff rate quotas (TRQs).

Subsequent to consultations in December 2020, on May 25th, 2021, the U.S. requested the establishment of a dispute settlement panel.

The U.S. alleges that Canada’s practice of allocating a significant proportion of the TRQs to processors violates our CUSMA commitments. Canada’s position is that it is fully meeting its CUSMA commitments by implementing our chosen TRQ allocation mechanism, which also fulfills Canada’s longstanding supply management objectives of ensuring predictability and stability in Canada’s dairy market.

Softwood lumber

Supplementary messages

Background

Currently, most Canadian companies are subject to a combined duty rate of 17.90% on exports of certain softwood lumber products to the United States.

Softwood lumber continues to be a priority for the Government of Canada, and it is being raised at all levels and at every opportunity with the U.S. Administration. In addition, Canada continues to work with long-time allies in the United States, such as homebuilder associations, to stress that U.S. duties are causing undue harm to U.S. consumers, as well as to Canadian producers and communities. U.S. homebuilders have been vocal about the need to find solutions to high lumber prices and have specifically called for an end to duties on Canadian lumber. Canada’s position remains that a new softwood lumber agreement is in the best interests of both countries, and Canada is prepared to re-engage in negotiations when the United States is ready to discuss realistic proposals that would be acceptable to Canadian industry. In the meantime, Canada is continuing to vigorously pursue legal challenges against U.S. duties at the WTO and through NAFTA/CUSMA dispute settlement panels.

Under NAFTA Chapter 19, Canada is challenging the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) initial countervailing (CVD) and anti-dumping (AD) determinations.

Canada is also challenging Commerce’s determinations before the WTO. While the WTO AD panel found that the U.S. improperly calculated dumping margins, Canada appealed in June 2019 certain findings from the Panel that were inconsistent with past panel and/or Appellate Body reports. The Panel’s report on Canada’s CVD challenge was released in August 2020, with findings overwhelmingly in Canada’s favour, namely that U.S. CVD duties on Canadian softwood lumber are inconsistent with the United States’ WTO obligations. However, the United States appealed the Panel’s report in September 2020. Timelines for both appeal proceedings are unclear due to the WTO Appellate Body’s current lack of quorum.

Finally, Canada is pursuing challenges of the final results of Commerce’s first Administrative Reviews under Chapter 10 of CUSMA. Administrative reviews are annual reviews that Commerce conducts of its AD and CVD orders. The Administrative Review process establishes duty assessment rates for shipments entered during the period of review, as well as the new duty deposit rates going forward until the next annual Administrative Review is completed. The final results of the second Administrative Reviews were released on November 24, 2021, and nearly doubled the duty rate to which most companies are subject (17.90% up from 8.99%). The third Administrative Reviews are underway, and final results are expected in August 2022.

International Development

Canada’s international assistance response to covid-19

Supplementary messages

Update

Since February 11, 2020, the Government of Canada has committed over $2.6 billion to the global response to COVID-19. Canada has also made an additional $1 billion available for International Monetary Fund loans related to COVID-19. Canada has committed to donate the equivalent of 200 million COVID-19 vaccine doses to the COVAX Facility by the end of 2022.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The COVAX Facility is a global pooled procurement mechanism for COVID-19 vaccines. It has 2 windows: a self-financing window for upper-middle- and high- income economies and an Advance Market Commitment (AMC) window to support low- and lower-middle- income economies. The Facility has delivered more than 515 million doses, of which 161 million have been directed to AMC-eligible countries, and is designed to deliver 2 billion doses by the end of 2021.

Afghanistan

Update

The Taliban’s takeover on August 15 presents numerous challenges for Canada and the international community. Canada’s current priorities are: (1) safe passage of Canadians, foreign nationals and Afghans; (2) mitigating a humanitarian and refugee crisis; (3) continuing to advocate for inclusive governance and human rights, including for women, girls and other vulnerable groups; and, (4) counter-terrorism cooperation.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Following the Taliban takeover, much of the international community, including Canada, paused most development assistance to Afghanistan. As roughly 80% of

Afghanistan’s $11 billion public expenditure program relied on international assistance, the rapid withdrawal of development and security assistance, coupled with the loss of access to overseas assets, is significantly impacting the country’s economy, services and infrastructure. Canada is working with fellow donors and like-minded countries to develop a common approach on the considerations and conditions critical to the international community on the delivery of any development assistance in Afghanistan.

Sanctions and domestic anti-terrorism legislation present challenges to delivering international assistance in Afghanistan. Canada has listed the Taliban as a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code since 2013, making it a criminal offence to provide or make property available, directly or indirectly, knowing that it will be used by or benefit a terrorist group (whether listed or not). Efforts are underway to find solutions to respond to the needs of Afghans, while ensuring implementing partners do not contravene Canadian laws.

Assistance to china

Supplementary messages

Background

Assistance to China: Canada’s bilateral development assistance to China began in 1981 and expired in 2013. Based on GNI per capita, China is an eligible ODA recipient under the OECD-DAC definition. In 2019-20, Canada’s international assistance to China totalled $6.98 million: $3.22 million in bilateral spending and $3.76 million in imputed multilateral aid. Based on preliminary information, bilateral international assistance to China decreased to 2.8M in 2020-2021. Canada's bilateral spending in China ($3.22 million) is comprised mainly of funding to the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, Canada Fund for Local Initiatives, and the Canada-China Scholars' Exchange the Program (CCSEP).

The China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (CCICED): Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) is the departmental lead on Canada’s participation in CCICED. CCICED is an international advisory body that provides research-based policy recommendations on environmental and development issues. Canadian funds do not support the Chinese secretariat or China’s participation in CCICED. Canada’s participation in CCICED will continue until 2022 under the current arrangement. CCICED funding is transferred from GAC to ECCC in annual installments of $1.6 million, for a total of $8 million over 5 years drawn from Canada’s official development assistance (ODA) envelope. Both Canada and China provide approximately equal shares of CCICED’s overall budget (1/3 each) with the remaining 1/3 provided by other participating partners including the U.S., the EU, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Norway.

Canadian Fund for Local Initiatives (CFLI): Canada provides modest funding for small-scale, short-term (usually 1 to 2 years) and high-impact projects to address local needs. The Canadian Embassy in Beijing administers and manages CFLI projects in China and the Canadian Ambassador to China is responsible for project approval. These projects are implemented mainly by local non-governmental organizations. In 2021-2022 CFLI funding to China has a total budget of $800,000. [REDACTED].

China and the Canadian Ambassador to China is responsible for project approval. These projects are implemented mainly by local non-governmental organizations. In 2021-2022 CFLI funding to China has a total budget of $800,000. Due to the nature of these projects and their implementing partners in China, some CFLI projects are considered to be highly sensitive.

Canada-China Scholars' Exchange Program (CCSEP): CSSEP was established in 1973 as an official bilateral academic exchange program. Over the past 47 years, more than 1000 scholars have participated in the program. For inbound Chinese recipients, Canada provides a grant of $2,200 per month, which covers medical insurance, visa, work permit, and living expenses, while the Government of China pays for their travel to Canada. For outbound Canadian recipients, Canada covers the cost of travel to China for up to $3,300 per return ticket, while the Government of China covers their tuition and living expenses in China. Canada’s total CCSEP expenditure for 2020-2021 was $143,000.

Asian Infrastructure Investment Banks (AIIB): As the lead on AIIB, questions should be directed to Finance Canada. Canada owns 1% of AIIB, which has adopted the operating framework, governance structures and best practices of similar longstanding Multilateral Development Banks and includes as members Australia, France, Germany and the UK. The majority of AIIB’s active projects are co-funded with other multilateral development banks, and are accordingly governed by well- established rules and norms. To date, the AIIB has approved funding for seven projects in China. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a national foreign policy and development strategy, while the AIIB is a multilateral development bank.

Asian Development Bank (ADB): Canada is a founding member of ADB and is currently the 7th largest shareholder (2nd non-regional after the US), owning 5.23% of ADB’s capital subscription. The ADB’s five largest shareholders are Japan and the United States (15.6% each), China (6.4%), India (6.3%), and Australia (5.8%). China is eligible for ADB assistance at market-based terms and cannot access concessional resources. China is approaching the point of graduation from ADB assistance, with ADB shifting from an infrastructure-based support model for China to one that focusses on global public goods such as health and environment.

WTO trips agreement waiver proposal

Supplementary messages

Responsive – Bolivia’s request regarding a compulsory licence for the production of COVID-19 vaccines by the Ontario company Biolyse

Supporting facts and figures / Background

Canada is also a leading donor to the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator, and the COVAX Facility, the ACT Accelerator’s vaccines pillar.

Bolivia’s request regarding a compulsory licence for the production of COVID-19 vaccines by the Ontario company Biolyse

they are ineffective in addressing the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In view of the agreement between Bolivia and Biolyse, any decision taken by the Minister of ISI on whether to list the J&J vaccine on Schedule 1 can be expected to factor into negotiations on the TRIPS waiver, and can also be expected to be cited by proponents in seeking either to broaden existing TRIPS flexibilities and/or a broad waiver from the TRIPS Agreement to address COVID-19.

United nations relief and works agency for palestine refugees (UNRWA)

Supplementary messages

Update

In 2021, two significant alleged neutrality violations were brought to the attention of Canadian officials and other donors. In January and February, Canadian officials were alerted to certain problematic learning materials that violated UN values were used by UNRWA for ‘self-learning’ during pandemic-related school closures. UNRWA has since assessed those materials and taken corrective actions. The Minister of International Development and Canadian officials continue to work closely with partners and UNRWA’s senior management to address the issue, and to help ensure that UN values are upheld and that UNRWA takes further corrective actions, as needed, in this regard. In August, a report from a group known as UN Watch alleged that UNRWA personnel promoted violence and hate through social media channels.

UNRWA launched an investigation into these allegations; should misconduct be found, the Agency is expected to decide upon appropriate administrative or disciplinary action.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Since 1948, UNRWA has been the only UN organization mandated to provide basic services to over five million Palestinian refugees in the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. UNRWA is almost entirely funded through voluntary contributions by international donors and has faced a significant funding shortfall partly as a result of growing needs, falling contributions, and a volatile environment. UNRWA's Program Budget (education, health and social services) and its Emergency Appeals for humanitarian assistance are currently significantly underfunded to cover services up to the end of 2021. Without significant additional resources, services may need to be cut, leading to negative humanitarian consequences.

National Defence (Anita Anand)

Canadian forces pay increase

Key Facts

Details

Heyder and beattie class actions final settlement agreement

Key Facts

Details

Timeline of settlements process

The restorative engagement program

Expanded contributions to NATO

Key facts

Details

Culture change

Key facts

Details

Future fighter capability project (FFCP)

Key facts

Details

Future fighter capability project

GBA +

Construction of fighter sqadron facilities

Operation unifier (Ukraine)

If pressed on training extremists in Ukrainian defence forces:

Key facts

GBA+:

Examples of Canadian Armed Forces Assistance provided:

Details

Veterans Affairs (Lawrence MacAulay)

2021-22 Veterans Affairs Canada Directed Supplementary Estimates (B)

Issue

Due to the general election, the 2021-22 Supplementary Estimates (B) proceeded as a directed exercise.

Response

Background

VAC’s budget will increase by $19.4 million, representing a 0.3% increase over current budget. VAC’s budget will increase from $6,298 million to $6,317 million in relation to the following transfers and adjustments:

[REDACTED]

Vote Transfers - $400K

Disability Processing Times and Action Plan

Issue

The Department recognizes that the long-standing issue of processing times for disability benefits is unacceptable and reducing them is our top priority.

Response

Background

Current State (November 24, 2021):

Veterans Affairs Canada Action:

Support for Military Sexual Misconduct Survivors

Issue

As part of the settlement of the Canadian Armed Forces-Department of National Defence Sexual Misconduct Class Action, and the requirement to fulfill legal obligations related to the implementation of the restorative engagement program under the final settlement agreement, Veterans Affairs Canada is actively working with the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces to develop psychosocial supports for Veterans who have experienced military sexual trauma. This joint initiative focuses on the development of a CAF and VAC peer support program for survivors of military sexual misconduct.

Response

Background

Under a clear mandate to the Minister of National Defence in budget 2021, Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) is actively working with the Department of National Defence to develop psychosocial supports for Veterans who have experienced military sexual trauma. This joint initiative focuses on the development of a CAF and VAC peer support program for survivors of military sexual misconduct, as part of the settlement of the Canadian Armed Forces - Department of National Defence Sexual Misconduct Class Action (also known as the Heyder- Beattie Class Action), and the requirement to fulfill legal obligations related to the implementation of the restorative engagement program under the final settlement agreement.

VAC places the highest priority on ensuring Veterans and their families, including survivors of military sexual misconduct, have the services they need when and where they need them. With the understanding that military sexual trauma impacts everyone differently, our commitment to supporting the diverse needs of survivors of sexual misconduct can be found in a number of areas:

Veterans and/or CAF members who have a physical or mental health condition related to military sexual trauma, such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, depression and/or physical conditions, are encouraged to apply to VAC for disability benefits. VAC has a dedicated unit to process these applications.

In March 2020, VAC announced its Office of Women and LGBTQ2 Veterans. The office was created in July 2019, and is identifying systemic issues specific to women and LGBTQ2 Veterans, and to advance gender equality, diversity and inclusion for all Veterans.

Veterans Affairs Canada is working closely with the Sexual Misconduct Response Centre, to expand its services to Veterans who experience military sexual trauma.

These initiatives are part of the implementation of supports announced in Budget 2021, that address broader Government of Canada objectives related to the National Action Plan to end Gender-Based Violence, and addressing sexual misconduct and culture change in the Canadian Armed Forces.

Veterans Affairs Canada Case Management

Issue

Demand for case management services continue to increase, which means caseloads for case managers remain high.

Response

Independent review:

Background

As of December 2020, the Veteran-to-case manager ratio is 33.1:1 (source: Veterans Affairs Canada December 2020 Facts & Figures Book).

Veterans Affairs Canada provides Case Management Services to support those facing complex challenges. It is a collaborative process between the client and Case Management Team to identify needs, set goals, and create a plan to help clients achieve their highest level of independence, health and well-being.

Our case management efforts are aimed at ensuring all Veterans receive the support they need, when they need it. Over the last number of years, we have approximately doubled the number of case managers in order to meet the increasing demands for Case Management Services.

In Budget 2018, as part of Service Excellence (Surge) we received temporary funding for additional case managers. Currently, there are 476 case managers (426 permanent and 50 temporary).

However, we recognize simply increasing staff numbers will not meet the increased demands for these services. As such, we implemented several initiatives which will improve efficiencies and case management practices, while ensuring the appropriate level of service is provided to Veterans and their families.

The implementation of Guided Support in December 2018 ensures Veterans with moderate needs have the appropriate supports in place provided by Veteran Service Agents, allowing Case Managers the capacity to focus on Veterans with more complex needs.

A screening tool implemented in January 2019 improves our ability to identify Veterans’ level of risk, needs and complexities so they can be triaged to an appropriate level of support.

A Case Management Renewal initiative will create a more balanced delivery model for case management services to Veterans. The initiative will introduce a new team approach, and improved tools and features from now until March 2022. The aim is to sustain the quality of Case Management Services by ensuring an interdisciplinary team works with Veterans so they receive the appropriate level of service based on their needs, risk and complexity.

In April 2021, we launched a new case management assessment, which uses digital initiatives to reduce administrative burden for case managers, thereby increasing their capacity to work directly with Veterans and their families.

Change of this magnitude takes time to implement. All of these strategies aim to create a more sustainable approach to Case Management Services, leading to a decrease in the ratios over the next few years.

Communications security establishment

supplementary estimates (B)

Key facts

Line Item’s included in CSE’s 2021-22 SEB

Details

Funding to invest in canada’s foreign intelligence in response to persistent threats

Funding to enhance the reliability and security of government of canada information technology networks

Government of Canada’s connections to the Internet and to cloud service providers while providing the security posture (i.e., monitoring and defence capabilities) required to protect Government of Canada data and applications.

Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (Ginette Petitpas-Taylor)

Supplementary Estimates (B) 2021-2022 - ACOA

Issue

Can you highlight the details of the adjustments made to ACOA's Supplementary Estimates?

Response

Background

ACOA is only requesting a portion of the Jobs and Growth Fund (JGF), announced in Budget 2021, for this fiscal year – the balance of the JGF will be made available in fiscal year 2022-23.

Upon tabling, ACOA’s total Estimates to date will show as $429.7 million, an increase of $17.4 million over the authorities of $412.3 million approved to date. The explanation of the variance is as follows:

All other Budget 2021 initiatives (ARRI, TRF, CCRF, BEP), totaling $53 million, will be requested under Supplementary Estimates ‘C’. This does not preclude approval of projects under these initiatives. The Agency is able to cash manage until the end of March 2022.

Preparation and approvals

ACOA contact: Phil McComiskey, Principal Advisor, Issues Management and Parliamentary Affairs, 506-377-5731

Sector expert: Lyne Lirette-LeBlanc, Director General, Finance & Administration, 506-866- 7180

Sector approval: Stéphane Lagacé, Vice-President Finance and Corporate Services, 506-851-6438

ACOA Programming Update and Key Sectors - ACOA

Issue

What are the current statuses of ACOA regular programs?

Response

Background

Preparation and approvals

Prepared by: Phil McComiskey, Principal Advisor, Issues Management and Parliamentary Affairs, 506-377-5731

Sector contact: Hélène Robichaud, Director General Programs, (506) 851-6496

Sector approval: Daryell Nowlan, Vice-President Programs, Policy and Communications, 506- 851-3805

COVID Support Update - ACOA

Issue

What is ACOA doing to support Atlantic Canadian businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Response

Background

Prince Edward Island

New Brunswick

Newfoundland and Labrador

Nova Scotia

Preparation and approvals

ACOA contact: Phil McComiskey, Principal Advisor, Issues Management and Parliamentary Affairs, 506-377-5731

Sector expert: Hélène Robichaud, Director General Programs, (506) 851-6496

Sector approval: Daryell Nowlan, Vice-President Policy, Programs and Communications, 506-851-3805

Canadian North Economic Development Agency (Dan Vandal)

CanNor Tourism Recovery Strategy

Issue

What has the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency done to promote the recovery of the tourism sector in Canada’s territories?

Response

Supplementary Messages

Background

At the onset of COVID-19, Canada’s territories enacted strict border measures and travel restrictions to minimize the risk of introducing the virus into isolated northern communities. These measures helped to lessen the public health impact to the territories. However, they also resulted in a disproportionate blow to the North’s tourism industry, which relies heavily on visitors from outside the territories and outside of Canada. Destination Canada estimates the territories lost $364M in international visitor spending, excluding air fares, in 2020 alone.

Prior to the pandemic, tourism in the North was key to economic diversification and support the development of small and medium-sized enterprises and local jobs. However, the territories continue to experience perennial industry challenges, including lack of local infrastructure, insufficient number of export-ready tourism operators, and high transportation costs for travel and shipping.

Through the Tourism Relief Fund, CanNor is supporting the implementation of the Northwest Territories’ Tourism Restart Investment Program, and the Yukon’s Elevate 2.0 program, designed to provide recovery strategies catered to the unique tourism landscape of each territory. In Nunavut, CanNor will provide the Tourism Relief Fund directly to eligible recipients, and has engaged with the Tourism Nunavut and operators to support applicants.

Within its regular programming, CanNor continues to support the tourism sector. For example, through IDEANorth, CanNor provided $2.7M to Northwest Territories Tourism to update its core destination marketing activities, and $900K to Yukon First Nation Tourism and Culture to grow and market Yukon’s Indigenous culture and tourism industries to support their multi-year strategic plan. CanNor has also supported infrastructure projects with tourism potential in the territories.

As Canada emerges from the pandemic, the government will support a safe restart of the Northern tourism sector, leveraging each territory competitive advantages while continuing to address pre-pandemic gaps in the industry.

Economic Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec (Pascale St-Onge)

Tabling of Supplementary Estimates (B) 2021-2022 for Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CED)

Issue

CED has requested $53.3 million, half of the funds announced in Budget 2021 to deliver the Canadian Community Revitalization Fund (CCRF) in Quebec, as part of Supplementary Estimates (B).

Response

Additional Messages:

Background

Parliamentary affairs office

Danielle Veilleux, Corporate Secretariat, Office of the DM/President, 514-226-7894

Preparation and approval

Prepared by: Karina Bazinet, Corporate Finance Branch/Budget Planning, Financial Management and Systems, 514-966-1452

Sector contact: Karina Bazinet, Corporate Finance Branch/Budget Planning, Financial Management and Systems, 514-966-1452

Approval: Mathieu Paquette, Corporate Finance Branch/Director General, 514-222-1499

Sector approval: Maxime Garon, Vice-President Corporate Services, 514-515-7000

Canada Economic Development for Quebec regions’ (CED) contribution to the economic recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic

Issue

CED is actively contributing to COVID-19 economic recovery measures in Quebec. Through recovery initiatives announced in Budget 2021, CED supports non-profit businesses and organizations, with a specific focus on the hardest-hit sectors, such as tourism.

Response

Supplementary response:

Background

Recovery initiatives announced in Budget 2021 and implemented by CED:

Jobs and Growth Fund (JGF)

Aerospace Regional Recovery Initiative (ARRI)

Canada Community Revitalization Fund (CCRF)

Tourism Relief Fund (TRF)

Major Festivals and Events Support Initiative (MFESI)

Example of a project supported by the recovery initiatives:

Parliamentary affairs office

Danielle Veilleux, Corporate Secretariat, Office of the DM/President, 514-226-7894

Preparation and approval

Prepared by: Bruno Martin, Strategic Partnerships Branch, 514-451-6749

Sector contact: Jean-Philippe Brassard, Strategic Partnerships Branch, 514-283-0703

Sector approval: Marie-Claude Petit, Vice-President, Operations, 514-283-3510

Achievements of Canada Economic Development for Quebec regions (CED)

Issue

With its 12 business offices located across Quebec, CED is the key federal partner for regional economic development in Quebec. Through its regular and temporary programs CED supports regional innovation, the growth of SMEs and the vitality of Quebec communities.

Response

Supplementary response:

Background

Examples of projects funded by CED

Parliamentary affairs office

Danielle Veilleux, Corporate Secretariat, Office of the DM/President, 514-226-7894

Preparation and approval

Prepared by: Bruno Martin, Strategic Partnerships Branch, 514-451-6749

Sector contact: Jean-Philippe Brassard, Strategic Partnerships Branch, 514-283-0703

Approved by: Simon Labrecque, Regional Operations Branch, 418-648-3019, and Jean-Philippe Brassard, Strategic Partnerships Branch, 514-283-0703

Sector approval: Marie-Claude Petit, Vice-President, Operations, 514-283-3510

Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CED) measures and programs in response to COVID-19

Issue

CED has supported a number of businesses and economic non-profit organizations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. To do so, CED implemented a number of temporary emergency measures, in addition to its regular programs. This support has helped SMEs restructure their operations, manage their cash flow or restart their businesses, and has also assisted sectors and groups that were harder hit.

Response

Supplementary response

Background

Emergency measures implemented by DEC

Regional Relief and Recovery Fund (RRRF)

Canadian Seafood Stabilization Fund (CSSF)

Regional Air Transportation Initiative (RATI)

Women Entrepreneurship Strategy (WES)

Regional Economic Growth through Innovation (REGI)

Example of project funded by CED:

Parliamentary affairs office

Danielle Veilleux, Corporate Secretariat, Office of the DM/President, 514-226-7894

Preparation and approval

Prepared by: Bruno Martin, Strategic Partnerships Branch, 514-451-6749

Sector contact: Jean-Philippe Brassard, DG, Strategic Partnerships Branch, 514-283-0703

Approved by: Simon Labrecque, DG, Regional Operations Branch, 418-648-3019, and Jean Philippe Brassard, DG, Strategic Partnerships Branch, 514-283-0703

Sector approval: Marie-Claude Petit, Vice-President, Operations, 514-283-3510

Date modified: