Minister of Foreign Affairs appearance before the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE) on Nord Stream 1 Gas Turbine
2022-08-04
Meeting scenario
- Your virtual appearance begins at 1:00pm, alongside your colleague Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson.
- Your appearance is scheduled to last 1 hour, and supporting officials from GAC and NRCan will be attending to support you.
- The Committee scheduled two additional panels: the first with the Ukranian Canadian Congress (UCC) from 2:30-3:00pm, the second with Ukranian Ambassador Kovaliv, EU Ambassador Gabrič and German Ambassador Sparwasser from 3:30-5:00pm.
- The following officials are accompanying you virtually during the appearance and may be called upon to respond to questions:
- Marta Morgan, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs
- Heidi Kutz, Acting Assistant Deputy Minister, Europe, Arctic, Middle East & Maghreb
- Lynn McDonald, Director General, International Economic Policy
- The following officials are expected to accompany Minister Wilkinson:
- John Hannaford, Deputy Minister of Natural Resources
- Nada Vrany, Director General, Petroleum Resources
Opening Remarks (MINA and Minister Wilkinson)
Motion to appear – Passed July 15, 2022
That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development undertake a study to examine the government’s decision to circumvent Canadian sanctions to allow the export of Gazprom turbines; that the committee determines the number of meetings required to carry out this study; that the Minister of Natural Resources and Minister of Foreign Affairs appear before the committee, along with officials from their respective departments, no later than July 22nd, 2022 based on availability, noting the urgency of the situation; that representatives from the Ukrainian Canadian Congress, the Ambassador of Ukraine to Canada, Ambassador of Germany to Canada, Ambassador of the European Union to Canada be invited to appear before the committee; and that committee members submit lists of additional witnesses.
Issue specific context
Positions of the Foreign Affairs Critics on the Nord Stream 1 gas turbine:
Michael Chong, CPC
- Believes Canada is “circumventing” its own sanctions regime.
- The Prime Minister was “more than willing” to allow Europe to become dependant on Russian energy exports.
- The government has failed to recognize Canadian energy as “vital” to Canadian and European security.
- The governed should approve new oil pipelines and LNG terminals.
Stéphane Bergeron, BQ
- Canada is “casually” applying its sanctions regime.
Heather McPherson, NDP
- Returning the Nord Stream 1 turbines “goes against” Canada’s sanctions regime.
- Canada lacks legitimacy when calling for Russia to be held accountable.
- Russia “does not need” the turbine in order to supply gas to Germany.
- “New Democrats urge the Liberal government to reverse this decision”.
Committee context
- After your opening remarks of 5 minutes, the committee will move to rounds of questions. Time may allow for two complete rounds as follows:
First Round
- Conservative (6 minutes)
- Liberal (6 minutes)
- Bloc Québécois (6 minutes)
- New Democrats (6 minutes
Second Round
- Conservative (5 minutes)
- Liberal (5 minutes)
- Bloc Québécois (2.5 minutes)
- New Democrats (2.5 minutes)
- Conservative (5 minutes)
- Liberal (5 minutes)
- Any subsequent rounds of questioning will follow the order and timing of the second round.
Committee membership & interest – See binder tab 3 for full bios
- The committee is currently comprised of the following members:
- Ali Ehsassi, LPC (Chair)
- Marty Moritz, CPC (Vice-Chair)
- Stéphane Bergeron, BQ (Vice-Chair)
- Ziad Aboultaif, CPC
- Rachel Bendayan, LPC
- Hon. Michael Chong, CPC
- Hon. Hedy Fry, LPC
- Garnett Genuis, CPC
- Heather McPherson, NDP
- Hon. Rob Oliphant, LPC
- Randeep Sarai, LPC
- Sameer Zuberi, LPC
- During the current Parliament, the committee has studied:
- Situation at the Russia-Ukraine border and implications for peace and security;
- Situation in the Taiwan Strait;
- Situation in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region;
- Vaccine equity and intellectual property rights; and
- Mandate letters (Foreign Affairs and International Development).
Previous appearance
- You appeared before FAAE on Thursday, March 24th, 2022 on the subject of your mandate letter.
Date: July 18, 2022
Speaking notes for the Honourable Jonathan Wilkinson, Canada’s Minister of Natural Resources, for an appearance before the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development Natural Resources on the conflict in Ukraine
Words: 880
Delivery Time: Est. 5 minutes @ 160 wpm
I welcome the opportunity to join Minister Joly to discuss this serious matter: Russia’s brutal assault on the Ukrainian people, and its continued weaponization of energy against our European allies.
We strongly support Ukraine’s heroic defence against Russia’s illegal aggression. My heart has been with Ukraine and its people every single day since this war began.
The unity of NATO members has resulted in robust sanctions that have imposed severe costs on Putin’s regime, and will continue to do so.
Canada and our allies have supplied military aid critical to the defence of Ukraine. This is on top of our efforts to welcome refugees, and provide humanitarian aid.
We are facing a regime that is actively destabilizing global energy markets in an effort to continue its war of aggression against Ukraine and to undermine the energy security of our allies in Europe as a form of blackmail.
That’s why we are engaging extensively with our American and European friends to coordinate our response to Russia’s aggression, while supporting Europe in its goals to move towards secure, reliable and clean energy sources.
Pause
In June, Siemens Canada applied to Global Affairs Canada with an urgent request for a permit to allow for the continuation of regularly scheduled engineering services, technical support and maintenance of six A65 turbine engines at their facilities in Montreal.
As Minister Joly has said, this decision was not taken lightly. I connected multiple times with my counterparts in Ukraine, Germany and the EU to better understand the situation, including the technical aspects of the issue, if any alternatives were possible and the risks around Russian disinformation that had already begun to spread. I and my department also consulted with experts including the Canada Energy Regulator and the International Energy Agency.
We have always recognized that the intention of our sanctions is to punish Putin – not to jeopardize Europe’s fundamental energy security and economic stability.
Some have casted doubt that Gazprom would continue to operate the pipeline - providing vital energy to Europe’s households as they stock up for the winter. Given that
Gazprom is essentially an arm of Putin’s regime, these concerns are well-founded.
Let me be clear, Putin decided to weaponize the Nordstream repairs by publicly stating that unless the turbines were brought back; it would be Canada’s fault that Germany was losing access to Russian gas. This game being played by Russia was designed to divide our alliance.
Canada will never aid Putin in dividing the unity of purpose in our alliance. Instead, our government consulted closely with our allies in order to take this card out of Putin’s hand.
That is why Minister Joly granted Siemens the permit allowing them to complete the scheduled maintenance work and return all six turbines to Germany. As Minister Joly mentioned, this permit is time limited and revocable.
Canada’s decision to remove Putin’s excuse and keep our alliance united has been publicly supported by the US and across Europe. They understand this was the only responsible course of action, while recognizing Ukraine’s concerns around the continued integrity of sanctions against the Russian regime.
Putin’s attempt to shut off the flow of natural gas through the Nord Stream pipeline would threaten the fundamental energy security and economic stability of Europe, if he decides to do this anyway, it will be his decision alone and our united alliance will stand together in enforcing the consequences of those actions upon his regime.
Let me be clear, returning the turbines that deliver natural gas to Europe is essential to ensuring the continued economic stability of Europe – which is vital to the defence of Ukraine as well. Alongside our allies, we have collectively provided billions of dollars to Ukraine in military, financial and humanitarian aid to fight Russian tyranny.
And we will continue to help nations like Germany access energy as they continue to transition away from Russian oil and gas. As we do this, we remain clear-eyed on the short term challenges presented by Putin’s weaponization of energy.
Our allies understand the difficult position they are in. And Germany is taking action in real time to lower energy demand - asking industry to produce half a million new heat pumps each year - to prepare for what is coming.
And Germany is not alone in its concerns, Italy, Austria, Slovakia, Czechia and many other allied countries are also fundamentally threatened by Putin’s actions.
[Pause]
Canada’s action highlights two priorities.
First, we and our allies must do everything in our power to help Europe access secure alternatives to Russian energy as winter approaches.
And second, Canada must continue to support our European allies in decarbonizing their energy system to reduce their overall dependence on Russia while fighting climate change.
On energy security, we have acted swiftly with the infrastructure that exists today.
Canadian producers have stepped up by agreeing to my request that they increase oil and gas production by 300,000 barrel equivalents per day.
I would remind my colleagues that European Commission President stated that “It’s our switch to renewables and hydrogen that will make us truly independent.”
That is why, in the longer term, we are also supporting Europe with our expertise in renewables and nuclear, while encouraging private sector proposals to build export capacity on our Atlantic coast for clean fuels such as Hydrogen, that are consistent with net-zero, and would ensure Europe’s long term energy security.
Colleagues, it’s clear that Europe is moving in the right direction. And we are moving in lockstep.
As the Russians use energy as a tool for blackmail, we will continue to support our European friends in transitioning away from Russian hydrocarbons. This is how we support them in shoring up their energy security while remaining laser-focused on moving towards net zero to combat the threat posed by the climate crisis.
I look forward to your questions.
Thank you.
FAAE Members' Biographies
ALI EHSASSI
(LPC – WILLOWDALE, ON)
CHAIR
Key Interests
- Canada-China Relationship
- Iran flight PS752
- International Trade
- Vaccine Equity/Procurement
Parliamentary Roles
MP Ehsassi served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry (December 2019 – August 2021). He was Vice-Chair for the Canada-China Legislative Association (CACN) (April 2019 – Feb 2020), which he has been a member since December 2015. He has also been a member in both the Canadian NATO (CANA) and Canada-Africa (CAAF) Parliamentary Associations.
Notable Committee Memberships
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 –present
- Member, Industry, Science and Technology (INDU), October 2020 – August 2021; February 2020 – August 2020
- Member, Justice and Human Rights (JUST), September 2017 – September 2019
- Member, Scrutiny of Regulations (REGS), February 2016 – January 2019
- Member, Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), March 2017 – September 2017
- Member, Citizenship and Immigration (CIMM), January 2016 – March 2016
Background
MP Ehsassi was born in Geneva and raised in New York City and Tehran. He is a graduate of the University of Toronto (B.A.), attended the London School of Economics (M.SC.) and received degrees from Osgoode Hall Law School (LL. B) and Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. (LL.M).
Previously, MP Ehsassi worked as a lawyer in the private sector and as a civil servant at the provincial and federal levels.
Issue Specific Statements
From July 8 to 10, 2022, MP Ehsassi travelled to the Baltics (Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia) concerning the war in Ukraine. On May 6, 2022, MP Ehsassi travelled to Kyiv alongside an EU parliamentarian delegation.
On May 13, 2022, MP Ehsassi made the following statement in the House:
“Mr. Speaker, two months after Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, estimates suggest that over 2,100 Russian missiles have rained down on Ukraine, displacing 12 million, damaging over 200 health care facilities, and destroying 200 heritage sites throughout the country. While visiting Irpin, Bucha and Borodyanka last week, I witnessed first-hand the mass atrocities and unspeakable crimes Russia has visited upon Ukraine.
Despite such unconscionable brutality, every Ukrainian I encountered represented an awe-inspiring profile in courage and fortitude.
That is why the surprise visit by our Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs to Kyiv was crucial, a testament to our country's unwavering commitment to support Ukraine and hold Putin to account. Proud Ukrainians will never relent, and neither should we in our assistance.”
At the April 25, 2022 FAAE meeting on Vaccine Equity and Intellectual Property Rights, MP Ehsassi pushed back on the opposition assertion that the main issue in COVID-19 vaccine procurement is related to supply, and he questioned the effectiveness of a TRIPS waiver at the WTO.
On March 12, 2021, during Question Period, MP Ehsassi rose in the House to deliver the following statement: “It is important for our government that there is a just global recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Canada is a strong proponent of a multilateral rules-based system within the WTO context. We are committed to ensuring strong, resilient global medical supply chains and have reached out to the waiver proponents to better understand their concerns.”
He has previously been outspoken about Iran and flight PS752, questioning compensation, requesting an assessment on Iran’s draft report and a transparent investigation, and has asked departmental officials if this matter could/should be addressed at the International Court of Justice.
MARTY MORANTZ
(CPC – CHARLESWOOD – ST. JAMES – ASSINIBOIA - HEADINGLEY, MB)
VICE-CHAIR
Key Interests
- Import/Export Policies
- Vaccine Equity/Procurement
- Human Rights
- Tigray
- China
- Israel
Parliamentary Roles
Martin Morantz was first elected in October 2019. He served as the National Revenue Critic from March to August 2020.
MP Morantz is a newer MP, but has involved himself in many parliamentary groups, such as the Canada- Europe (CAEU), Canadian NATO (CANA), Canada-US (CEUS), and Canada-UK (RUUK) Parliamentary Associations, as well as the Canadian Delegation to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly (SECO). He is also the Vice-Chair for the Canada-Israel Inter- Parliamentary Group (CAIL).
Notable Committee Memberships
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), October 2020 – Present
- Member, Finance (FINA), January 2020 – August 2020
Background
MP Morantz holds a BA in political studies from the University of Manitoba and a law degree from Osgoode Hall Law School. Prior to his election to Parliament, he served as city councillor on the Winnipeg City Council (2014-2018) where he chaired the Finance and Infrastructure Committee. Prior to his tenure as City Councillor, MP Morantz was a lawyer for 23 years in a Winnipeg law firm. He also presided over Jernat Investment Ltd., a property investment and financial services firm. He also served on the boards of many community groups focusing on autism advocacy and research, assisted living and numerous groups in the Jewish community.
Issue Specific Statements
During the May 12, 2022 FAAE meeting on the war in Ukraine, MP Morantz focused on the relationship between Russia and China, vis-a-vis Ukraine:
“Thank you, Mr. Chair. I want to touch on the meeting between Mr. Putin and Mr. Xi in February before Russia invaded Ukraine. In that meeting they declared a new era in the global order, where they endorsed their respective territorial ambitions. Presumably that means that Russia is endorsing China's claim over Taiwan. The pact challenged the U.S. as a global power and NATO as a cornerstone of international security and liberal democracy.
I guess the question in my mind was.... I can understand why Mr. Putin would love to have this pact before he invaded Ukraine. I'd be interested in your comments on why President Xi would agree to such a thing. I'm wondering if President Xi regrets it, given how badly this Russian incursion has gone for them.”
During the March 21, 2022 FAAE meeting on Vaccine Equity and Intellectual Property Rights, MP Morantz was highly critical of the government for providing $173 million in funding to Medicago for its Covifenz COVID-19 vaccine, despite Phillip-Morris' 20 percent ownership of Medicago, and the WHO’s long standing policy of non-collaboration with tobacco firms.
In December 2021, MP Morantz accused the government of “funding terrorists” following an NGO Monitor report which stated that Canadian tax dollars have been linked to the Union of Agricultural Work Committees (UAWC) (which is connected to the designated terrorist organization: the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine). UAWC was declared a terrorist organization by the Israeli government in October 2021.
In March 2021, MP Morantz presented three petitions to the House of Commons regarding: (1) ending the violence in Tigray; (2) allowing humanitarian access to the region; and (3) calling for international investigations into war crimes and human rights violations.
In February 2021, MP Morantz delivered a speech comparing the Uyghur genocide to the Holocaust, demanding that the Prime Minister do more to help liberate them, and that the government “call out the Chinese Communist regime’s heinous acts for what they truly are: a genocide.”
On January 27, 2021, during QP, he declared that Canada’s funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) is being used to fund the indoctrination of children by inciting violence toward Jews. He asked the government to suspend its funding, stating that classroom materials distributed to Palestinian students encourage them to “defend the motherland with blood”, portray child-murdering terrorists as heroes and call Israel the enemy.
On November 4, 2020, MP Morantz rose in the House at QP to ask the Prime Minister whether he approved the export of drones to Turkey.
On October 8, 2020, MP Morantz rose in the House of Commons and presented a petition regarding the persecution of the Uyghurs. He stated: “The petition says in part that it is clear that the UN conventions around the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide have been breached. Canada cannot remain silent in the face of this ongoing atrocity. The petition formally requests we recognize that Uighurs in China have been, and are being, subject to genocide and to use the Magnitsky Act in this case”.
STÉPHANE BERGERON
(BQ – MONTARVILLE, QC)
VICE-CHAIR AND CRITIC FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Key Interests
- Canada-China Relations
- Taiwan
- Human Rights
- 5G
- Ukraine/Russia
Parliamentary Roles
MP Bergeron is currently the Bloc Québécois’ (BQ) Critic for Foreign Affairs, International Development and Canada-China Relations. He has been a member of numerous parliamentary associations and interparliamentary groups, particularly the Canada-China Legislative Association (CACN) and the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA). He also served as Vice-Chair for the Subcommittee on International Trade, Trade Disputes and Investment of the Standing Committee from 2002-2004, and the Whip for the BQ from 1997 to 2001.
Notable Committee Memberships
- Vice-Chair, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 – present; February 2020 – August 2021
- Vice-Chair, Special Committee on Canada-China Relations (CACN), January 2020 – August 2021
Background
MP Bergeron served as a BQ member of the House of Commons from 1993 to 2005 and a member of Quebec’s National Assembly from 2005 to 2018. In 2019, he returned to the House of Commons as a BQ member. MP Bergeron has a bachelor’s and master’s degree in political science. After first leaving the House of Commons and serving in Quebec’s National Assembly for 13 years, he was registrar of Rimouski’s CEGEP. He was previously a political advisor and a teaching assistant at Université Laval within the political science department. From 1984 to 1993, he served in the Canadian Forces as a naval cadet instructor cadre officer.
Issue Specific Statements
On May 2, 2022, during a meeting of FAAE, MP Bergeron was critical of the government for not providing a timeline for the reopening of the embassy in Kyiv, and the government’s lack of transparency in its security assessments. On March 29th, 2022, MP Bergeron spoke critically of the government’s proposed plan for Ukrainian refugees who seek to come to Canada, and the lack of assurance that health care coverage would be provided.
During an opposition day on December 7, 2021, regarding the creation of a Special Committee on Afghanistan (AFGH), MP Bergeron rose to criticize the government on calling an election as the situation in Kabul was escalating. During this debate, he also linked escalation by Russia at the Ukraine border to Afghanistan as “countries who do not share Canada’s values taking advantage of the coalition’s supposed weakness to impose their views.”
The majority of MP Bergeron’s statements have been related to China, including the eight-month vacancy of Canada’s Ambassadorship and the related impact on the bilateral relationship. He has raised concern regarding the possible invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Republic of China. In Question Period, MP Bergeron has focused on human rights, asking “What will it take for the government to take action and finally get Raif Badawi released?” He followed this question by stating: “it is scandalous that Raif Badawi is languishing in prison after seven years without having committed any crime. If the government can sit down with Saudi Arabia at the G20, if it can sit down with Saudi Arabia to do business and sell the country weapons, then it can certainly sit down with Saudi Arabia to demand the release of Raif Badawi.”
ZIAD ABOULTAIF
(CPC – EDMONTON MANNING, AB)
Key Interests
- Canada-US Relations
- Oil and Gas Industry
- International Trade
- Vaccine Equity/Procurement
- China/Human Rights
Parliamentary Roles
MP Aboultaif has been a member of numerous parliamentary associations and friendship groups. He has been a recurring member to multiple groups, such as the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA), the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association (CAEU), the Canada-UK Inter-Parliamentary Association (RUUK), and the Canada-US Inter-Parliamentary Association (CEUS). MP Aboultaif was also Conservative Critic for digital government from November 2019 to September 2020 and previously served as the Critic for International Development and the Critic for National Revenue.
Notable Committee Memberships (Ziad Aboultaif)
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 – present; September 2017 – September 2019
- Member, International Trade (CIIT), October 2020 – August 2021
- Member, Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO), February 2020 – August 2020
Background
MP Aboultaif was first elected in 2015 and has been re-elected since. He is a small business owner, working in logistics and distribution. He has stated that he has dealt with the process of international trade, dealing with Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and the United States, for his own business commitments. His 2015 campaign pledged to support small businesses and to support pipeline development.
Issue Specific Statements
At the May 5, 2022 session of FAAE on Tibet, MP Aboultaif focused on the deterioration of human rights of the Tibetan people and raised concern that it will only further worsen as China grows in strength.
During the April 4, 2022 FAAE session on Vaccine Equity and Intellectual Property Rights, MP Aboultaif was highly critical of the government for providing $173 million in funding to Medicago for its Covifenz COVID-19 vaccine, despite Phillip-Morris' 20 percent ownership of Medicago, and the WHO’s long standing policy of non-collaboration with tobacco firms.
MP Aboultaif has made multiple pointed statements regarding his support for the oil and gas industry, stating “If Line 5 is shut down, all Canadians from coast to coast to coast will feel the economic downturn”. He has also made statements regarding the importance of diversification in trade and has questioned if Canada has a plan for investing in other markets, should there be need.
RACHEL BENDAYAN
(LPC – OUTREMONT, QC)
PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY TO THE MINISTER OF TOURISM AND ASSOCIATE MINISTER OF FINANCE
Key Interests
- International Trade
- Climate Change
- Immigration
- China/Human Rights
- Russia/Ukraine
Parliamentary Roles
MP Bendayan was first elected in a by-election in February 2019. She is currently serving as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance and has previously served as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Small Business, Export Promotion and International Trade. She has also been a member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association (CAEU), the Canadian Delegation to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly (SECO) and is a member of the Executive to the Canada-France Inter- Parliamentary Association (CEUS).
Notable Committee Memberships
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 – present
- Member, International Trade (CIIT), October 2020 – August 2021; January 2020 – August 2020
- Member, Economic Relationship between Canada and the United States (CAAM), August 2021– February 2021
- Member, Status of Women (FEWO), April 2019 – September 2019
- Member, Finance (FINA), May 2019 – September 2019
Background
Before entering politics, MP Bendayan was a lawyer with Norton Rose Canada in Montreal in the fields of litigation and international arbitration, specializing in international trade law. While in private practice, Bendayan also taught at the Université de Montréal’s Faculty of Law. She ran for the Liberal Party in Montréal in 2015, losing to Thomas Mulcair. After the election, she was hired as the chief of staff to the former Minister of Small Business and Tourism, Bardish Chagger.
Issue Specific Statements
On June 9, 2022, MP Bendayan made the following statement in the House regarding the situation in Ukraine:
“Mr. Speaker, the Russian invasion began over 100 days ago. Since then, the people of Ukraine have been experiencing a massacre.
In December, two months before the invasion, I proposed that the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development urgently examine the situation in Ukraine. Our work is not done, and I still think it is very important.
Our foreign affairs committee heard from the Ukrainian ambassador about the horrific acts of violence, rape, torture and cold-blooded murder of civilians. The Ukrainian ambassador invited our committee to come to Ukraine to bear witness to this, which I very much hope to do, but the Conservative Party refused. What is more, it has been nearly four weeks that the Conservatives have been filibustering the work of our committee, preventing us from hearing from witnesses and getting on with our work.
Now, just this week, the Conservative Party officially proposed to the House to drop sanctions against Russia on certain agricultural goods. It is shameful.
In times of crisis and in times of war, we must rise. We cannot obfuscate. We cannot back down. We must rise to meet the moment.”
On May 12, 2022, MP Bendayan spoke in the House against the CPC opposition motion for the reestablishment of the Special Committee on Canada-China Relations, which she characterised as “inappropriate”.
During the May 5th, 2022 FAAE session on Tibet, MP Bendayan spoke to China’s “coercive labour” practices against the Tibetan people, and the “colonial boarding schools” meant to deny children access to their culture, language, religion, and families.
In recent committee meetings, MP Bendayan has stressed the importance of protecting Canada’s supply chains in international trade agreements. She also gave a speech on vaccine access where she stated: “The pandemic is not over anywhere until it is over everywhere.” (May 2021).
In the past (October 2020), MP Bendayan has mentioned her concern about the decision of the United States to investigate the export of blueberries and stated her party will advocate for exporters. She has expressed interest in tariffs, exports, and bilateral trade, with the United States.
HON. MICHAEL D. CHONG, P.C.
(CPC—WELLINGTON – HALTON HILLS, ON)
OFFICIAL OPPOSITION CRITIC FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Key Interests
- Foreign Policy
- Human Rights
- Iran + Flight PS752
- Climate Change
- China/Human Rights
Parliamentary Roles
MP Chong is currently serving as the Official Opposition Critic for Foreign Affairs. MP Chong previously occupied the positions of President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and the Minister for Sport from February to November 2006. He has been a member of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA), the Canada-China Legislative Association (CACN), and the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (CEUS), among others.
Notable Committee Memberships
- Vice-Chair and Member, Special Committee on Afghanistan (AFGH), December 2021 – June 2022
- Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), October 2020 – present
- Member, Subcommittee on International Human Rights (SDIR), March – August 2021
- Member, Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology (INDU), September 2018 – 2019; 2009 – 2010
- Member, Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities (TRAN), September 2017 – 2018
- Member, Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU), October 2013 – January 2014
Background
MP Chong was first elected to Parliament in 2004 and has been chair of several House of Commons Standing Committees. He is a co-founder and member of the All-Party Climate Caucus since it was formed in 2011. In the 42nd Parliament, MP Chong served as the official opposition’s Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Shadow Minister for Science. In 2015, Chong’s Reform Act passed in Parliament and became law.
Prior to his election, MP Chong acted as chief information officer for the National Hockey League Players’ Association and as a senior technology consultant to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority for the redevelopment of Pearson International Airport. MP Chong also co-founded the Dominion Institute, now known as Historica Canada, an organization committed to raising Canadians’ awareness of history and civics. He currently sits on its board of governors. MP Chong attended Trinity College in the University of Toronto where he obtained his BA in philosophy.
Issue Specific Statements
On July 10, 2022, MP Chong issued the following statement on behalf of the CPC regarding the Nord Stream 1 gas turbine:
“Yesterday, Canadians learned that the Liberal government will be releasing a Russian owned gas turbine currently located in Canada to Germany, which will effectively allow for the turbine’s return to Gazprom, a Russian-state owned natural gas company. By returning the gas turbine, Canada is circumventing its own sanctions on Russia.
The Liberal government has failed to recognize Canadian energy as vital to both our economy, as well as Canada and Europe’s collective security. Though the fifth largest natural gas producer in the world, Canada has failed to step up in this time of extraordinary crisis. As Putin continues to use Russia’s energy supply as leverage against European democracies, it is clear the Liberal government’s commitment to supply 100,000 barrels per day equivalent of natural gas by year’s end is simply not enough.
Instead of circumventing the global sanctions package meant to punish Putin, the Liberal government should approve new pipelines and liquid natural gas terminals so that Canadian natural gas can displace Russian energy supplies in Europe. Allowing the return of the gas turbine sets a dangerous precedent of folding to Putin’s blackmail of Europe, and will negatively impact Canada’s standing on the world stage.
It is clear Prime Minister Trudeau was more than willing to allow Europe to become dependent on Russian oil and gas, and is now prepared to look the other way while Russia funds its brutal and illegal war in Ukraine with the profits from the energy it sells to Europe.
Conservatives will continue to stand with Ukraine, the people of Ukraine, and the more than one million Canadians with ties to Ukraine. We will also continue to advocate for policies that strengthen our relationship with our allies like Germany, so they are less reliant on Russian natural gas. Conservatives will call on the government to implement strong measures to counter Russia’s aggression and to strengthen the security of Canada and its allies.”
At the May 5, 2022 FAAE session on Tibet, MP Chong pointed to the sanctions imposed on Chinese officials for their human rights abuses/violations against the Uyghur people in Xinjiang, questioned their effectiveness, and whether sanctions should be imposed for similar abuses in Tibet.
On January 8, 2022, MP Chong released a statement accusing the Trudeau government of “failing to take serious action against the Iranian regime for the downing of Flight PS752.”
MP Chong has made several statements on Afghanistan, most recently during the CPC Opposition Day on December 7, 2021. He characterized Canada’s withdrawal as “a betrayal of the legacy of the hundreds of thousands of soldiers of the NATO alliance who fought in the war in Afghanistan for freedom, democracy and the rule of law.”
On April 12, 2021, MP Chong accused the government of threatening to cancel funding for the Halifax Security Forum if it awarded the John McCain Prize to Taiwan’s President and asked whether Canada supports Taiwan’s participation at the WHO’s meeting in May 2021.
MP Chong was sanctioned by the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on May 27, 2021.
On March 26, 2021, during Question Period, he raised the secret trials of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor and questioned the government on its participation in the Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank (AIIB). On March 30, 2021, he expressed concerns on Twitter that the Chinese were limiting access to the WHO investigating team.
MP Chong (and MP Garnett Genuis) have focused significant attention on the human rights situation of the Uyghur population in China. On January 24, 2021, the two MPs issued a Conservative statement calling on the government to recognize the Uyghur genocide, encourage allies to do the same, and update its travel advisories to reflect the potential threats to Canadians when travelling to China. He led the charge on the motion adopted by the House recognizing the genocide of Uyghurs on February 22, 2021. On March 27, MP Chong, along with members of SDIR, was specifically targeted by Chinese sanctions to which he responded that he would wear it as a badge of honour. He is now advocating for Canada to put in place systems to prevent imports of goods issued of forced labour.
MP Chong has been interested and vocal on a variety of issues including China, the mistreatment of Uyghurs, arms export controls, Iran, and Armenia.
HON. HEDY FRY, P.C.
(LPC – VANCOUVER CENTRE, BC)
Key Interests
- Women Right’s/Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Ukraine
- Canadian Heritage
- Population Development
- China
Parliamentary Roles
Dr. Fry served as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and the Minister of Human Resources and Skill Development (Internationally Trained Workers Initiative) from July 2004 to November 2005. She also served as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration from December 2003 to June 2004. Dr. Fry has been a member of many parliamentary committees, associations, and interparliamentary groups, since 2002. She currently serves as head of Canada’s delegation to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly (OSCEPA) and is the OSCEPA’s Special Representative for Gender Issues. She also Chairs the Canadian Association of Parliamentarians for Population Development (CAPPD).
Notable Committee Memberships
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 – present; February 2020 – August 2021
- Member, Liaison (LIAI), December 2021 – present; February 2016 – February 2018
- Chair, Canadian Heritage (CHPC), December 2021 – present; February 2016 – Feb 2018
- Vice-Chair, Health (HESA), October 2014 – January 2014; September 2012 – September 2013
- Member, National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), 2017- 2020
Background
Dr. Fry is a Trinidadian Canadian politician and physician. She completed her medical training at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. She is currently the longest-serving female Member of Parliament, winning nine consecutive elections in the constituency of Vancouver Centre. Ms. Fry
worked at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver for 23 years. She served as president of the British Columbia Federation of Medical Women in 1977. She was president of the Vancouver Medical Association in 1988 to 1989, the BC Medical Association in 1990-1991, and chaired the Canadian Medical Association's Multiculturalism Committee in 1992-1999.
Issue Specific Statements
On May 12, 2022, MP Fry tweeted “China surrounds Taiwan with war ships and war planes - Says its ‘just drills’ where have we heard that before?”, regarding the PLA Air Force violation of Taiwan’s ADIZ.
During the April 25, 2022 FAAE meeting on Vaccine Equity and Intellectual Property Rights, MP Fry focused extensively on the proposed TRIPS waiver at the WTO, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, gender equity in vaccine uptake and educating those who are vaccine hesitant.
In a previous FAAE committee meeting (June 1, 2021), MP Fry said: “it would be so very important to have Ukraine as an eastern European democratic country committed to all the international rules and all the tenets of democracy”. She also questioned what officials will be doing to protect women and girls’ sexual and reproductive rights, specifically when they are fleeing their countries (and at high risk of being abused). Her comments regarding Ukraine often focus on the protection of democracy, given her role in the Canadian Delegation to the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly.
Ms. Fry rose in the House in February 2020 to speak on female genital mutilation (FGM), noting, “In 1997 the Liberal government criminalized FGM in Canada. Now we are engaging with other nations, donors, UN organizations and civil society to take action to eliminate FGM globally… More needs to be done. Ending FGM requires governments to act with legislation to protect the human rights of women and girls, with policies that empower them and, most importantly, in this year of Beijing+25, to remember that women's rights are human rights.”
In 2017, Ms. Fry rose in the House to speak on refugee and migrant women and girls worldwide, stating: “Of the 65 million people displaced by conflict, 55% are women and children. Displaced women and girls often experience rape, forced marriages, and sexual slavery… As we laud our own progress, let us remember that women's rights are human rights, and we cannot celebrate fully until all women enjoy those rights.”
GARNETT GENUIS
(CPC – SHERWOOD PARK – FORT SASKATCHEWAN, AB)
OFFICIAL OPPOSITION CRITIC FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Key Interests
- China and Human Rights
- Vaccine Mandates/Regulations
- International Human Rights
- Organ Harvesting
- Sanctions (Russia/China)
Parliamentary Roles
MP Genuis is currently the Conservative Critic for International Development and Human Rights. He previously served as the Conservative Critic for Canada-China Relations and Multiculturalism. He was a member of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA) from September 2018 to March 2019 and a member of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (CEUS) from February to March 2017. In September 2017, he triggered an emergency debate in the House of Commons concerning the plight of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, and he has presented a private member’s bill and numerous petitions over the past two Parliaments to draw attention to the combat against trafficking in human organs.
Notable Committee Memberships
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 – present; October 2020 – August 2021; September 2017 – September 2018
- Vice-Chair, Canada-China Relations (CACN), October 2020 – August 2021; Member, February 2020 – August 2020
- Member, Subcommittee International Human Rights (SDIR), February 2020 – August 2020
Background
MP Genuis was elected in 2015, 2019 and again in 2021. He grew up in Strathcona County and got involved in his community through volunteering with various organizations, including a local care centre.
At age 15, he began writing a column for Sherwood Park News for which he continues to be a regular contributor as an MP.
MP Genuis holds a bachelor of public affairs and policy management from Carleton University and master's of science in philosophy and public policy from the London School of Economics. Prior to his election, he worked in the Prime Minister’s Office.
On his website, he cites three of his priorities being: the development of pipelines, advancing human rights, and immigration.
Issue Specific Statements
On June 20, 2022, MP Genuis submitted the following Order Paper Question (OPQ) to Global Affairs Canada concerning Russia Day:
With regard to engagement with the Russia embassy in Ottawa, since February 23, 2022:
- How many meetings, phone calls, or email exchanges have occurred between ministers, ministerial staff, parliamentary secretaries, or public servants, and representatives of the Russian embassy?;
- what were the (i) dates, (ii) times, (iii) details, (iv) objectives, (v) outcomes, of the meetings or exchanges in (a)?;
- How many social events hosted by the government were held where the Russian embassy or an employee of the Russian embassy received an invitation?;
- What were the (i) dates, (ii) times, (iii) locations, (iv) details, of the social events in (c)?;
- How many social events hosted by the Russian embassy did a Canadian minister, ministerial staffer, parliamentary secretary, or public servant attend; and (f) what were the (i) dates, (ii) times, (iii) locations, (iv) details, of the social events in (e)?
On June 16, 2022, MP Genuis made the following statement in the House during the debate on Global Food Insecurity:
“Madam Chair, we are in the House tonight talking about probably one of the most critical issues that we are going be confronting in this Parliament. We are talking about a global food crisis, and we need to talk about it more. We are talking about a global food crisis in which hundreds of millions of people's lives and well-being are at stake. We know already that 181 million people are expected to be at crisis or worse levels of hunger around the world. This is a massive challenge that we need to talk about more: the global food crisis. We need to be sounding the alarm on this and calling for stronger government action.
How do we address this challenge? I think we need to reflect on the need to focus more on food security and food aid as part of international development. We need to talk about the role the Russian aggression is playing in causing global hunger. We need to talk about how Canadian government policy is hurting the agricultural sector and reducing its ability to respond to this global crisis. All three of these are parts of the response we need to have.”
MP Genuis is sponsoring Senator Ataullahjan’s Bill S-223 (trafficking in human organs) in the House of Commons (currently at second reading as of May 16th, 2022).
On May 12, 2022, he rose in support of MP Chong’s motion to re-establish the Special Committee on Canada-China Relations, in which he said the following: “From its creation, the committee did critical and relevant work. One indication of that is that, while most parliamentary committees barely get mentioned in the press, this special committee broke news stories at virtually every single public hearing”.
At FAAE on March 24, 2022, MP Genuis spoke to Huseyincan Celil’s continued detention in China, and criticized the government for a “lack of engagement in recent years, especially since 2015”. On the subject of Russia, he requested the specific amount of sanctioned assets that have been seized in Canada since the beginning of the war in Ukraine.
On December 21, 2021, MP Genuis recently presented petitions in the House for: 1) increased support of the Haraza community in Afghanistan; and 2) asking Parliament to use Magnitsky sanctions against those responsible for human rights violations in China.
On June 10, 2021, he also spoke on Canada being the only G7 country to have drawn from COVAX supply, characterizing it as a “real failure”.
On November 26, 2020, he introduced a motion (M-55) to combat foreign state interference in Canada.
During a meeting at CACN on May 25, 2020, MP Genuis delivered the following statement, comparing the situation in Hong Kong to Russia’s previous invasion of Ukraine: “There is no honour in trying to play the disinterested and neutral broker between the oppressor and the oppressed. There is only honour in championing the cause of the oppressed and working to advance the cause of justice. That is what Canada did after Putin's invasion of Ukraine. We drove an international consensus which isolated the Kremlin, punished it for its actions and supported the Ukrainian people. We used a combination of economic and political measures to support victims of violence and to deter future aggression. A government with a principled foreign policy would be doing the same today.”
On January 24, 2020, together with Foreign Affairs Critic Chong, MP Genuis issued a Conservative statement calling on the government to recognize the Uyghur genocide, encourage allies to do the same, and update its travel advisories to reflect the potential threats to Canadians when travelling to China. Although MP Chong presented the motion for the House to recognize the Uyghur genocide, MP Genuis has been a strong advocate on this topic and spoke quite often on the issue in the House.
HEATHER MCPHERSON
(NDP – EDMONTON STRATHCONA, AB)
CRITIC FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Key Interests
- Human Rights
- Vaccine Equity
- Gender Equality
- Women’s Empowerment/Reproductive Rights
- International Development and Assistance
- FFP/FIAP
Parliamentary Roles
In the 44th Parliament, MP McPherson was appointed as the NDP Deputy Whip, Critic for Foreign Affairs, International Development, and Deputy Critic for Canadian Heritage. She was previously the Deputy House Leader for the NDP. McPherson is also a member of numerous parliamentary associations and interparliamentary groups, such as the Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CCOM), the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA), the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association (CAEU), and the Canada-Israel Interparliamentary Group (CAIL). She is Vice- Chair of the Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association (CAAF), which she has been a member of since 2019.
Notable Committee Memberships
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 –present
- Member, Subcommittee on International Human Rights (SDIR), December 2021 – present; October 2020 – August 2021; February 2020 – August 2020
- Member, Canadian Heritage (CHPC), October 2020 – August 2021; February 2020 – August 2020
Background
Heather McPherson is the Member of Parliament for Edmonton, Strathcona. She was elected in 2019 and 2021. McPherson was a member of the Canadian delegation to the United Nations and the former executive director of the Alberta Council on Global Co-operation. MP McPherson’s website states that she has an interest in poverty reduction, human rights, environmental protection, and gender equality.
Issues specific statements
On July 11, 2022, MP McPherson made the following statement on behalf of the NDP regarding the Nord Stream 1 gas turbine:
"It is shocking and disappointing that the Liberal government has decided to allow the Nord Stream 1 turbines to be sent to Germany and returned to Russia. This decision goes against the sanctions Canada imposed on Russia in response to the illegal invasion and genocide in Ukraine.
Canadians expect their government to show real solidarity with Ukraine but the Liberal government’s decision is an affront to Ukrainians.
How will Canada have any legitimacy in asking other countries to hold Russia accountable for its crimes when we do not adhere to our own sanctions?
Putin claims Russia will provide gas to Germany with the return of the turbines – but we cannot believe anything Putin says. He has lied time and time again. Why would this time be any different? It is important to note that Russia does not need this turbine to supply gas to Germany.
New Democrats support the request from the Ukrainian Canadian Congress to immediately reconvene the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee to discuss the federal government's decision. I have also proposed that the Committee study Canada’s failing sanctions regime. It is clear that the Liberal government’s approach to sanctions is both inconsistent and incoherent, and Canadians deserve to know why.
This decision sets a dangerous precedent. Russia will use these pressure tactics again and again – and the Liberal government must not capitulate. New Democrats urge the Liberal government to reverse this decision.”
At the May 3, 2022 SDIR session on the current situation of human rights in Ukraine and Russia, MP McPherson spoke to “the ways that Russia has gone into Ukraine, despite lying over and over again, has fired on citizens and has, very clearly, done unspeakable, horrific things”. She has been very critical of the Russian government and their alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Ukraine, which she has characterized as such.
During the April 25, 2022 FAAE meeting on Vaccine Equity and Intellectual Property Rights, MP McPherson was very critical of AstraZeneca and Pfizer for their COVID-19 vaccine procurement practices and asked “when will it be enough money for you” that vaccines could be provided without cost and pointed to Pfizer’s $37 billion profit for their COVID-19 vaccine.
MP McPherson has been a strong voice on Afghanistan, especially on women and girls in the region. She tweeted on December 16, 2021: “I am completely devastated by this news. A 10-year-old girl, a child, died because her family supported the Canadian military and Canada did not protect them. The Liberals have failed this girl, this family, and all the Afghans who have been abandoned.”
MP McPherson put forward two motions at FAAE’s December 13, 2021 meeting: 1) that the committee undertake a study on global vaccine access at the earliest possible opportunity and that the study focus on Canada's contribution to COVAX, as well as the impacts of intellectual property rights on global access to COVID-19 vaccines; and 2) that the committee hold at least two meetings on the situation unfolding in Ukraine and that witnesses include officials from Global Affairs Canada and the Ukrainian Canadian Congress.
MP McPherson was sanctioned by the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on May 27, 2021.
MP McPherson has also repeatedly raised Canada’s official development assistance at both FAAE and SDIR. For example, at the November 26, 2020 SDIR meeting, she stated that “Canada has not played a strong enough role in development” and asked witnesses to speak to the importance of humanitarian aid.
HON. ROBERT OLIPHANT P.C.
(LPC – DON VALLEY WEST, ON)
PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY TO THE MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Key Interests
- Multiculturalism
- Rules Based International Order
- International Trade
- Human Rights/LGBTQ+ support
- Canada-China Relations
Parliamentary Roles
Rob Oliphant was made the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs in May 2019 and retained this role in the 43rd and 44th Parliaments. He is actively involved in parliamentary associations. He is currently Vice-Chair of the Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association (CAAF) and is a member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association (CAEU), the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA), and the Canada-China Legislative Association (CACN), among many others.
Notable Committee Memberships
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 – present; October 2020 – August 2021; February 2020 – August 2020
- Member, Canada-China Relations (CACN), October 2020 – August 2021; January 2020 – August 2020
- Chair, Citizenship and Immigration (CIMM), September 2017 – May 2019; Member, September 2010 – March 2011, March 2010 - September 2010
- Chair, Public Safety and National Security (SECU), February 2016 – September 2017, 2009
Background
PS Oliphant was first elected to the House of Commons in October 2008. He was defeated in the 2011 federal election but was re-elected in 2015, 2019 and 2021. He graduated with a bachelor of commerce from the University of Toronto in 1978. During his time at University of Toronto, he was active in the University of Toronto Liberal Club, as well as the Ontario (New) Young Liberals. After obtaining a master’s of divinity from the Vancouver School of Theology, he was ordained as a United Church Minister in 1984. His official title is The Reverend Doctor Robert Oliphant, MP.
PS Oliphant worked in Premier David Peterson’s office in 1989. He later worked for two provincial Ministers, Christine Hart, Minister of Culture and Communications, and Mavis Wilson, Minister Responsible for Women’s issues.
He has been vocal on issues of support for people living with disabilities, the LGBTQ+ community, and encouraging multiculturalism. From 2008-2011, he served as the Official Opposition Critic for Veteran’s Affairs and for Multiculturalism.
Issue Specific Statements
At FAAE on May 5, 2022, PS Oliphant voted in favour of MP Chong’s motion regarding the Sino-Tibetan dialogue, that Canada should support the facilitation of negotiations between the People’s Republic of China and the Central Tibetan Administration, while adding an amendment to “[enable] Tibet to exercise genuine autonomy within the framework of the Chinese.”
During the May 2nd, 2022 FAAE meeting on the war in Ukraine, PS Oliphant said the following: “You used the word “barbaric” earlier. I would say that Canadians have been shocked. This is the 21st century, yet the war being waged by Russia against Ukraine is nothing like it should be in the 21st century. It shouldn't be happening, of course, but it feels like an ancient war, where civilians and infrastructure are targeted, and there is an aggression that we have not seen—that I have not seen in my lifetime. Canada will continue to stand in solidarity.”
In a Global Affairs Canada news release from January 6, 2021, Parliamentary Secretary Oliphant reaffirmed support for advancing non-proliferation and disarmament during the third meeting of foreign ministers of the Stockholm Initiative for Nuclear Disarmament.
On January 1, 2021, PS Oliphant tweeted: “Canada and Canadians cannot and will not abandon the Afghan people. Despite the tremendous challenges on the ground, we continue to get humanitarian assistance through using trusted multilateral partners.”
PS Oliphant frequently defends Canada’s foreign policy model, stating it “is based on renewing a rules- based international order that Canadians have built together, protecting universal human rights, supporting democracies,” and noting “We are a leader in the world on critical issues, whether it is in Venezuela, or in the Middle East or in China, all around the world. We will continue to stand with our allies, with NATO partners, as we continue to ensure Canada's leadership is strong and heard in our world with allies and like-minded who work with us.”
RANDEEP SARAI
(LPC – SURREY CENTRE, BC)
Key Interests
- Human Rights
- Vaccine Equity/Procurement
- Climate Change
- China
Parliamentary Roles
MP Sarai was first elected in 2015. Previously, he has been involved in many parliamentary groups, such as the Canada-China Legislative Association (CACN) from 2015-2020, the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA) from 2016-2019, and the Canada-Israel Interparliamentary group (CAIL) in 2016.
Notable Committee Memberships
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), December 2021 – present
- Chair, Justice and Human Rights (JUST), December 2021 – present; Member, February 2021 – August 2021
- Member, Economic Relationship between Canada and the United States (CAAM), February 2021 – August 2021
- Member, International Trade (CIIT), October 2020 – August 2021; January 2020 – August 2020
- Member, Citizenship and Immigration (CIMM), January 2016 – September 2019
Background
MP Sarai is a lawyer by training, with experience in real estate development and urban planning. He has a BA from the University of British Columbia, majoring in political science, and a bachelor of laws degree from Queen’s University. He has served on the boards of a number of community organizations dedicated to combatting youth violence in Surrey.
Issues specific statements
At SDIR on May 3, 2022, MP Sarai underlined the “egregious” and “appalling” human rights violations in Ukraine, including “war crimes and crimes against humanity that were being committed by Russian forces against civilians”.
During the April 25, 2022 FAAE meeting on Vaccine Equity and Intellectual Property Rights, MP Sarai questioned the effectiveness of a TRIPS waiver at the WTO, given there is insufficient manufacturing capacity for a waiver to be practical, stating: “I would like to find out if any of the witnesses can elaborate on how practical a TRIPS waiver would be, taking in the time...how long it would take to build a facility specifically for the mRNA type of vaccines, which would procure the ingredients and manufacture and deliver vaccines?”
At FAAE on March 28, 2022, MP Sarai questioned departmental officials on the upcoming trip by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, to China and her expected report on the current human rights situation in Xinjiang.
MP Sarai has raised issues regarding the inequities of vaccination and the socioeconomic impact that vaccine inequality presents worldwide. Additionally, he raised concerns about climate change, and the need for more sustainable and green processes. He has also made statements regarding international organ trafficking, voicing his support for Bill S-223, An Act to Amend the Criminal Code and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (trafficking in human organs) during its second reading.
SAMEER ZUBERI
(LPC – PIERREFONDS – DOLLARD, QC)
Key Interests
- Minority Rights
- Diversity and Inclusion
- India (Muslim Rights)
- Yemen
- Uyghurs in China
Parliamentary Roles
MP Zuberi was a member of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA), the Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CCOM), and of the Canadian Group of the Inter- Parliamentary Union (UIPU).
Notable Committee Memberships
- Chair, Subcommittee on International Human Rights (SDIR), June 2022 – Present
- Vice-Chair, Scrutiny of Regulations (REGS), April 2022 – Present
- Member, Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE), June 2022 - Present
- Member, Public Safety and National Security (SECU), December 2021 - Present
- Member, Subcommittee on International Human Rights (SDIR), June 2020 – August 2020; October 2020 – February 2021; December 13, 2021 – June 2022
- Member, Scrutiny of Regulations (REGS), February 2020 – August 2020, October 2020 – February 2021, March 2022 – Present
- Member, Justice and Human Rights (JUS), February 2020 – August 2020; October 2020 – February 2021
Background
MP Sameer Zuberi was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Pierrefonds-Dollard in 2019. MP Zuberi previously worked at McGill University’s Faculty of Medicine and has also worked professionally as a legal researcher, an educator, in media relations and in human rights. His work includes serving on McGill University’s Senate, the boards of a West Island poverty relief organization – a legal association, and the Conseil intercultural de Montréal which is an advisory body to the City of Montreal. MP Zuberi holds degrees in law from the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) and in mathematics from Concordia University.
Issue Specific Background
On March 24, 2022, at a FAAE meeting, MP Zuberi asked whether Canada is working with our allies to create an off-ramp for Vladimir Putin that allows him to save face to end the conflict. On May 6, 2022, MP Zuberi met with Canada’s Ambassador to the UN to discuss the human rights situation in Ukraine.
On Twitter, MP Zuberi has condemned Russian action to silence independent journalism within the country. At SDIR’s last meeting, MP Zuberi asked witnesses to provide examples of Russia’s violations of international obligations and human rights abuses.
Sanctions in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Canada’s sanctions measures are unprecedented both in impact and their level of coordination with international partners. These measures aim to limit Russia’s ability to finance its egregious war and increase international pressure on Russia.
- The objective of Canada’s sanctions regime is to provoke a change of behaviour on the part of President Putin and those who have enabled and supported his war of choice – not to harm Canada’s allies and partners or the global economy.
- Canada has repeatedly expanded the scope of its sanctions on Russia, Belarus, and Russian proxies in Ukraine including by designating over 1,200 individuals and entities since February 24, 2022.
Supplementary messages
- The cost of not responding to Russia’s attack on Ukraine is greater than the collective cost of implementing sanctions. Not acting would have been perceived as a tacit green light to Russia and might have led to further destabilization, emboldening other countries wishing to redraw borders.
- These measures aim to limit Russia’s ability to finance its egregious war, and to provoke a change of behaviour on the part of President Putin and those who have enabled and supported his war of choice, not to harm our allies.
Update
On July 29, 2022, Canada sanctioned an additional 43 individuals and 17 entities. These persons include military officials involved in the Bucha massacre and entities in the defence sector directly or indirectly supporting the Russian military.
Background
Since the start of the February invasion, under the Special Economic Measures Act (SEMA), Canada has sanctioned over 1200 individuals (1057) and entities (202) in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. This includes senior officials, close associates of the Putin regime financial elites, oligarchs and their family members and agents of disinformation for their involvement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as well as those supporting the regime’s ongoing aggressive actions in Ukraine and Belarus. In addition, Canada implemented targeted and hard-hitting restrictions in financial, trade (goods and services), energy, transport and defense sectors. Most recently, Canada prohibited the provision of 30 services in 15 targeted industry categories in the oil, gas, chemical and manufacturing sectors. In coordination with allies and as part of our G7 commitment, Canada also prohibited the import of certain gold products from Russia on July 7, 2022. Canada introduced restrictions on trade to and from the so-called LNR and DNR regions; revoked Russia’s and Belarus’s Most Favoured Nation status; banned export and import of targeted luxury goods to/from Russian and Belarus; targeted Russia’s ability to access to the global financial system; supported advocacy efforts to have major Russian banks removed from SWIFT; stopped the issuance of new permit applications and cancelled valid permits to export controlled military, strategic, and dual-use items to Russia. Canada also prohibited the export to Russia and Belarus of a list of goods and technologies, including several used or that could be used in the manufacturing of weapons. Canada closed airspace to all Russian and Belarusian aircraft and prohibited all Russian vessels from entering internal waters and docking at domestic ports. Canada along with the US, UK, Australia and New Zealand restricted Russian oil and gas imports.
Impact: Canada’s sanctions measures, in coordination with our like-minded partners, have had a serious impact on Russia. On June 27, 2022, Russia defaulted on paying its foreign debt for the first time since 1918; and the World Bank’s “Global Economic Prospects” (June 2022) says Russian GDP will decline by 6% in 2022 and 3.5% in 2023. Russia is facing unprecedented global isolation, those closely associated with
the Putin regime are prevented from accessing our financial system. Russia’s capacity to wage war is impaired, and negative economic impacts will help to dissuade future aggression. Canada is aware that it faces some collateral economic damage for taking
economic measures against Russian oligarchs and businesses, but inaction would have had a greater negative impact on Canada in the long term. Canada’s measures against Russia do not and will not target essential exports of food and agricultural inputs to third countries, or other humanitarian necessities such as medicine and medical devices. This is in line with our partners – the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and many more.
Support to Ukraine
- Canada strongly condemns President Putin’s unprovoked and unjustifiable invasion of Ukraine, which is an attack on the rules-based international order, including the UN Charter.
- Canada moved quickly, in coordination with G7 and NATO partners, to provide substantive and meaningful support to Ukraine and to isolate Putin’s regime politically and economically.
- Canada will continue to support Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and will continue to stand in solidarity with the brave and resilient people in Ukraine.
Supplementary messages
- Canada continues to engage in intense diplomacy with partners and allies, as well as with the broader international community, to enhance our humanitarian, development, economic, and military support for Ukraine and call on Russia to turn to diplomacy.
- Canada remains deeply concerned about the worsening humanitarian crisis, including the targeting of civilians, destruction of entire cities, the sheer increase in displacement, and the increasing vulnerabilities of refugees and internally displaced persons as a result of this crisis.
- Canada is working in coordination with international partners to help mitigate the significant secondary effects of the war globally, as well as counter Russian disinformation attributing the devastating impacts of Russia’s war, including the global food crisis and increasing energy prices, to the West and Ukraine.
Supporting facts and figures
- In 2022, Canada has committed over $3.2 billion in multifaceted support to Ukraine
- Since January 2022, Canada has committed $320 million to support the humanitarian response in Ukraine and other impacted countries in the region.
- Leveraging its humanitarian partnerships, including with the Canadian Red Cross, Canada has so far delivered 1,052 family tents and 376,000 essential relief items from its stockpiles.
- Prime Minister Trudeau and President of the European Commission Von der Leyen co-hosted the “Stand Up with Ukraine” pledging event on April 9, which raised over $12.4 billion in pledges to support Ukrainian refugees and the ongoing humanitarian response.
- Since January 2022, Canada has committed over $500 million in military aid to support Ukraine.
- From 2015 through January 2022, Canada’s Operation UNIFIER has provided training to over 33,000 Ukrainian military personnel and security forces.
- Canada has offered up to $1.45 billion in new loan resources to the Ukrainian government through a new Administered Account for Ukraine at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) so that the government can continue to operation; of this, $1 billion has already been disbursed.
- This is on top of the offer of up to $620 million in bilateral loans offered in 2022, of which $500 million has been provided.
- Canada is providing an additional $13.4 million to the G7 Rapid Response Mechanism (RMM) to counter disinformation.
- Since the invasion, the Peace and Stabilization Operations Program (PSOPs) has scaled up our security and stabilization programming in Ukraine, and has committed to support over $39.7 million in new programming. This includes targeted support to Ukrainian civil society and human rights organizations, providing support to Ukraine’s security sector, scaling up mine action efforts, monitoring and documenting human rights violations, countering disinformation, and advancing accountability efforts.
- Canada announced an additional $35 million in development assistance funding to address emerging priorities in Ukraine, an additional $7 million allocation to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) to support victims of Sexual and Gender- Based Violence (SGBV), $2 million for the completion of a dairy processing plant, and $52 million to respond to Ukraine’s urgent need for increased grain storage capacity and lab equipment.
- Canada announced two new immigration streams for Ukrainians coming to Canada – the Canada Ukraine Authorization for Emergency Travel (temporary) and an expedited path for permanent residency through a new family sponsorship program (permanent) - and $117 million to implement these measures.
- On April 9, the Prime Minister announced an additional series of measures to make coming to Canada easier, including targeted charter flights for Ukrainians, short-term income support to ensure basic needs are met, and temporary hotel accommodation for up to two weeks.
- Canada’s three federal chartered flights, which landed in Winnipeg, Montreal, and Halifax, carried over 950 Ukrainians fleeing the war.
- Diplomacy and coordination continue at the UN, NATO, OSCE, and G7, including with non-traditional partners. The G7 Summit was held June 26-28, and it was the fourth time Leaders have spoken since the invasion. The NATO Summit was held June 28-30.
- Canada strongly advocated for three successful UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolutions: suspension of Russia’s membership to the Human Rights Council (April 7), humanitarian consequences of Russian aggression against Ukraine, (March 24), condemning Russian aggression against Ukraine (March 2).
- On March 1, Canada, along with several other member states, referred the situation in Ukraine to the International Criminal Court (ICC), due to allegations of international crimes in Ukraine by Russian forces, including war crimes and crimes against humanity.
- Since February 2022, Canada has imposed sanctions on nearly 1,200 Russian, Belarusian, and Ukrainian individuals and entities implicated in Putin’s war.
Reinforcing eastern flank allies
- Proud to lead the enhanced Forward Presence battlegroup in Latvia as Framework Nation.
- Canada is deploying approximately 1,375 troops to NATO’s eastern flank.
- An additional approximately 3,400 CAF personnel are ready to deploy to support NATO, if required.
Supplementary messages
- At the June 2022 NATO Summit in Madrid, Canada and Latvia signed a Joint Declaration outlining our commitment to augmenting the Canada-led enhanced Forward Presence battlegroup.
- On March 8, the Prime Minister announced that Canada will renew its commitment to Operation REASSURANCE beyond 2023. This demonstrates our commitment to bolstering the security and stability of our Allies along NATO’s eastern flank.
- Canada continues to fully support NATO’s prudent military planning and a strengthened deterrence and defence posture on the eastern flank.
Supporting facts and figures
- Operation REASSURANCE is Canada’s largest international military operation, with approximately 1,375 deployed Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) personnel deployed along NATO’s eastern flank.
- Canada is the Framework Nation for NATO’s enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) battlegroup Latvia, which includes around 695 CAF troops.
- Canada contributes two frigates and approximately 500 members of the Royal Canadian Navy to the Standing NATO Maritime Groups (SNMGs), to patrol Allied waters.
- On a rotational basis, Canada deploys six CF-18 fighter jets and up to 135 members of the Royal Canadian Air Force, to support NATO air policing of the Black Sea region. Next rotation will be in summer 2022, and will include two additional jets (for a total of eight jets). On February 22, Canada re- tasked a CP-140 Aurora long-range patrol aircraft to fall under NATO command and control.
- In addition, approximately 3,400 CAF personnel across all branches of the service are authorized to deploy to the NATO Response Force (NRF), if required.
- On April 15, 120 CAF troops were deployed to Poland to assist with processing Ukrainian refugees and provide medical support services. Up to 150 troops are authorized to deploy.
- Recent visits of Camp Ādaži in Latvia include PM Trudeau (March 2022), Minister Anand (February 2022), Minister Joly (November 2021).
Background
Operation REASSURANCE is Canada’s military contribution to NATO’s efforts in Central and Eastern Europe. Since 2017, Canada has led the NATO eFP battlegroup in Latvia as Framework Nation, one of eight such battle groups (with others located in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia). Nine Allies currently contribute troops to eFP Latvia. On March 8, Canada announced it will renew its commitment to Operation REASSURANCE beyond 2023.
On June 29, Canada and Latvia signed a Joint Declaration outlining our joint commitment to augment the Canada-led eFP Latvia battlegroup. This includes commitments by Canada, in consultation with Latvia and Allies, to scale up the current battlegroup by enabling a rapid and effective reinforcement in Latvia with a multinational brigade’s worth of forces. This includes commitments to: develop command and control elements in Latvia, forward-deploy or preposition personnel and equipment, acquire and deploy capabilities, such as anti-tank and air defence systems, and lead a planning process with Allies to identify troops to ensure the ability to surge a brigade into Latvia, as required by SACEUR.
ATIP protected background
Canada is undertaking three additional actions to bolster the CAF’s presence on NATO’s eastern flank. [REDACTED] Romania to bolster the deployment of the six CF-18s as part of the air policing mission. [REDACTED] Latvia to bolster the eFP.
[REDACTED].
Export controls - general
- Canada has one of the strongest export controls systems in the world, and respect for human rights is enshrined in our legislation.
- All export permit applications are reviewed under Canada's robust risk assessment framework, including against the Arms Trade Treaty criteria, which are enshrined in Canada's Export and Import Permits Act (EIPA).
- As Minister of Foreign Affairs, I must deny export permit applications for military items if it is determined that there is a substantial risk that the export would result in a serious violation of human rights, including serious acts of gender- based violence.
Supplementary messages
- As of February 24, 2022, Canada stopped the issuance of new permits for the export and brokering of controlled strategic, dual-use, and military goods and technology to Russia. Valid permits for the export of items to Russia were also cancelled.
- Every export permit application is evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine what the goods or technology will be used for, where they will be used and by whom, among other factors.
- Under the EIPA, a permit will not be issued if there is a substantial risk that the exported items could be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of human rights law; or serious acts of gender-based violence.
Update
In February 2022, export controls restrictions toward Russia were amongst the measures announced by the Prime Minister following the invasion of Ukraine. Since 2019, the issue of export controls has received sustained public, media and parliamentary attention, including through the 2021 study and report on arms exports permits of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development.
Supporting facts and figures
- Global Affairs Canada assesses over 5,000 export permit applications every year. In 2021, the value of Canadian exports of controlled military goods and technology to non-U.S. destinations amounted to approximately $2.731 billion, compared to a value of $1.966 billion in 2020 and $3.757 billion in 2019.
- According to the Report on Export of Military Goods, there were no commercial exports of military items to Russia in 2021. In 2020, military exports to Russia were negligible with a value of approximately $1,361, including one permit denial.
Background
Export controls are meant to ensure that controlled items are exported in a manner that is consistent with Canada’s foreign and defence policies and national security. Controls are not meant to unnecessarily hinder international trade, but to regulate and impose certain restrictions on exports in response to clear policy objectives. Most strategic items are controlled for export further to Canada’s commitments in the four main multilateral export control regimes.
Canada's sanctions regime
- Canada remains committed to playing a leadership role in the reservation and strengthening of an international rules-based order – sanctions are a component of this approach.
- Canada is judicious when it chooses to deploy sanctions and is committed to their effective and coordinated use, when appropriate.
Supplementary messages
- As seen in the Ukraine context, autonomous sanctions are an important complement to Canada's foreign policy tools, which include dialogue, capacity building, advocacy, multilateral engagement, and other diplomatic actions.
- Canada seeks to avoid unintended adverse effects of sanctions through targeted deployment and the use of humanitarian exemptions.
Update
Recent listings under Canada’s Special Economic Measures Act (SEMA) include:
- In response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, since February 24, 2022, Canada has imposed sanctions on: 772 Russian individuals and 175 Russian entities; 63 Belarussian individuals and 27 Belarussian entities; and 222 Ukrainian individuals;
- Jan 31, 2022: Sanctions imposed on 3 senior Myanmar officials.
- Dec 10, 2021: Sanctions imposed on 4 entities linked to the Myanmar military;
Supporting facts and figures
- Since 2021, Canada has imposed 45 rounds of SEMA sanctions (Belarus x7, China, Myanmar x5, Nicaragua x2, Russia x27, and Ukraine/Crimea x5). Many of these rounds were undertaken in coordination with likeminded countries, including Australia, EU, UK & US.
Background
SEMA allows Canada to impose sanctions on a foreign state, its individuals and entities, either due to a grave breach of international peace and security resulting in an international crisis; a call from an international organization on its members to impose sanctions; gross systematic violations of human rights; or cases of significant corruption. SEMA sanctions can include a dealings ban on targeted individuals and entities, and restrictions on trade or financial transactions. To maximize effectiveness, Canada coordinates with other countries. There are SEMA sanctions on 13 countries (see annex).
The Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (JVCFOA) allows Canada to target foreign nationals responsible for or complicit in gross violations of internationally-recognized human rights and acts of significant corruption. There are 70 individuals listed under the JVCFOA (see annex). Canadians are prohibited from dealing with these individuals, effectively freezing their Canadian assets. They are also inadmissible to Canada under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
Further to announcements made in Budget 2022, amendments to the SEMA and JVCFOA now allow for the seizure, forfeiture, disposal and redistribution of sanctioned assets. Proceeds generated from the sale of assets may be used for reconstruction of affected states, restoration of international peace and security, and compensation to victims.
In consultation with other government departments, GAC officials are currently finalizing the Terms of Reference of the Governance Committee that is being set up to make recommendations to the Minister of Foreign Affairs on potential assets to pursue under this new asset seizure and forfeiture regime, including in relation to the current conflict in Ukraine. Work in relation to further potential SEMA and JVCFOA amendments is also on-going.
Canada is legally required to implement sanctions imposed by the UNSC. These sanctions are implemented in Canada through regulations under the United Nations Act. There are 12 countries subject to UN sanctions: Central African Republic, Mali, DRC, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, DPRK, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, and Yemen.
Through targeted sanctions measures, the Government of Canada strives to minimize adverse consequences for civilians and for legitimate humanitarian businesses and activities. It mitigates unintended humanitarian consequences of sanctions through legislated exceptions for certain activities and the permit and certificate processes.
A review of the JVCFOA & SEMA is legislated to be undertaken by committees of the House and the Senate within five years after the coming into force of the JVCFOA (i.e. before Oct 18, 2022). To this end, the Department is preparing a memorandum for your information that provides further details on this review and explains the important opportunity it provides to reflect on lessons learned about these tools over the last five years. It is also a key opportunity to address identified gaps in the legislation and to build on best practices for the use of these tools moving forward.
Annex: Canadian autonomous sanctions listings
Special Economics Measures Act (SEMA)
- There are currently 2492 listings under SEMA:
- Belarus – 200 individuals/entities
- Myanmar – 137 individuals/entities
- China – 5 individuals/entities
- Iran – 202 individuals/entities
- Nicaragua – 35 individuals/entities
- Russia – 1097 individuals/entities
- South Sudan – 2 individuals
- Syria – 281 individuals/entities
- Ukraine/Crimea – 466 individuals/entities
- Venezuela – 96 individuals/entities
- Zimbabwe – 181 individuals/entities
Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (JVCFOA)
- There are currently 70 individuals listed under the JVCFOA:
- 1 from Myanmar
- 3 from South Sudan
- 19 from Venezuela
- 30 linked to murder of journalist Sergei Magnitsky
- 17 linked to murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi
NATO
- Canada is a reliable, forward leaning NATO Ally, unwavering in our commitment to transatlantic security and defence.
- Canada fully supports NATO’s effort to reinforce the Alliance’s eastern flank to deter and defend against Russian aggression.
- Every country has the right to choose its own path; Canada supports NATO’s Open Door Policy and Finland and Sweden’s applications to join the Alliance.
Supplementary messages
- Allied unity and commitment to the principle of collective defence are the foundation of NATO’s deterrent power.
- Canada has increased its military contributions to NATO, in particular through our leadership of NATO’s enhanced Forward Presence battlegroup Latvia.
- Canada and its NATO Allies are increasing political and practical support to Ukraine as it continues to defend itself against Russia’s full-scale invasion.
- NATO’s deployments in the region remain defensive and proportionate to the evolving security environment. NATO will not be sending troops to Ukraine.
- Pleased Canada was the first NATO Member State to ratify Finland and Sweden’s accession to NATO.
Supporting facts and figures
- Canada has contributed to every major NATO military operation (with the exception of deploying troops to the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan).
- Canada is the sixth largest financial contributor to NATO’s common budget.
- With the deployment of an additional 460 soldiers to Operation REASSURANCE, Canada has currently deployed roughly 1,375 troops to NATO’s eastern flank. A further 3,400 Canadian Armed Forces are authorized to deploy to the NATO Response Force, if required.
Background
NATO: The Alliance has been a cornerstone of Canada’s defence and security since 1949, and remains central to Euro-Atlantic security and the rules-based international order. NATO has three core tasks: (1) collective defence, (2) crisis management, and (3) cooperative security.
Russia/Ukraine: Allies have bolstered their contributions to NATO’s enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) battlegroups in the Baltic States and Poland, and established additional battlegroups in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia. Allies are responding to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine with sanctions and other measures, and contributing military aid on an individual basis. NATO is not a party to the conflict.
Membership: NATO’s door is open to new European members. Allies have invited Finland and Sweden to join the Alliance, and the ratification process is underway. Allies have reaffirmed they stand by the decision made at the 2008 NATO Bucharest Summit that Ukraine “will” (eventually) become a member of the Alliance. Canada supports NATO’s Open Door Policy, and has invested significantly in bilateral and defence relations with Ukraine in support of its Euro-Atlantic aspirations.
NATO Summit: From June 28-30, NATO Leaders held a transformative and historic Summit in Madrid. This included four main deliverables: (1) an updated Strategic Concept, (2) an invitation to Finland and Sweden to join the Alliance, (3) strengthened force posture on NATO’s eastern flank, and (4) increased common funding. NATO also launched a €1 billion Innovation Fund over the next 15 years to develop dual-use emerging technologies. The Summit featured NATO Partners, including a virtual address by Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, other European Partners, and a first-ever Summit meeting with NATO’s Asia Pacific Partners (Australia, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea). Prime Minister Trudeau announced Canada would host NATO’s Climate Change and Security Centre of Excellence (CCASCOE) in Montréal, and in time, the North American Regional Office of the Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA). Minister Joly announced Canada is expanding its diplomatic presence in Central and Eastern Europe and the Caucasus, including a new embassy in Armenia, converting current offices in Estonia, Lithuania, and Slovakia to full embassies with resident ambassadors, and strengthening our presence at our embassy in Latvia. Minister Anand and her Latvian counterpart signed a Joint Declaration to reaffirm each other’s commitments to NATO and security along the eastern flank.
Russia: president Putin's war against Ukraine
- Canada strongly condemns President Putin’s unprovoked and unjustifiable invasion of Ukraine.
- We urge Russia to immediately cease its attacks and withdraw its military forces from Ukraine.
- We are working with our like-minded partners to impose increasingly severe costs on Russia, through sanctions and other economic measures, as the invasion continues.
Supplementary messages
- Canada has repeatedly expanded the scope of its sanctions on Russia, Belarus, and Russian proxies in Ukraine including by designating over 1,200 individuals and entities since February 24, 2022.
- Canada continues to work closely with allies on economic measures, to counter disinformation and to hold Russia accountable for its actions.
Update
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently visited Egypt, Uganda, Ethiopia and the Republic of Congo (July 24 – July 27) in an attempt to shore up support on the African continent for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In a July 24th address to the Arab League in Cairo, Lavrov made a strident re-affirmation of the maximalist aims of Russia’s war in Ukraine. This comes after Putin’s recent July 19th visit to Iran, where he met with Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Turkish President Erdogan.
Russia continues to sell numerous false narratives on the invasion, as well as the global food and energy crisis. Russia is attempting to exploit and exacerbate tensions and potential grievances in Africa and Middle East with the West, by suggesting that Western sanctions are the cause of the global food crisis. Russia is also attempting to drive a wedge in transatlantic relations. Russian authorities continue to implicate Canada in a disinformation campaign to justify reductions of much-needed natural gas deliveries to Europe, claiming a delay in delivery, the faultiness of other current turbines, and lack of transparency in the process regarding the status of delivery.
During his visit to Uganda, Lavrov stated that Russia is prepared to return to the negotiating table with Ukraine at any time; Putin and Turkish President Erdogan are to meet in Sochi on August 5th. At the same time, Russia is preparing to hold "referendums" in the occupied regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia – both occupying authorities announced the creation of election commissions – which will only complicate negotiations.
On July 22, Türkiye, UN, Ukraine and Russia signed agreements for a UN-led Black Sea initiative. The two separate agreements include: safe grains passage from Ukraine and UN facilitation for Russian food and fertilizer exports. Russia attacked the port of Odesa one day after signing the agreement. UN Secretary General condemned the attack. Canada, US, Japan and the EU issued similar statements. The UN is evaluating the impact on the Black Sea initiative’s implementation, but indications are that the agreement is moving ahead. Canada and G7 counterparts are focusing efforts on supporting implementation of the agreements, and encouraging both sides to implement. The UN anticipates that the first ships could leave the ports in the near future, which will be an important first step.
Background
Since President Putin’s attempted annexation and illegal occupation of Crimea as well as the occupation of parts of the Donbas with proxy forces and mercenaries, dating back to 2014, he has continued to consolidate his control over Ukraine’s territory and advance efforts at further destabilization. Beginning in November 2021, Putin started amassing a large number of troops and military equipment in illegally occupied Crimea and along Ukraine’s border in Russia, occupied Donbas and in Belarus, effectively encircling the country from three sides. As a pretense to the invasion, Russian leadership had made numerous demands from NATO, including limits on further NATO expansion into Eastern Europe and the removal of troops and weapons from countries that joined the Alliance after 1997.
Despite intense western diplomacy, on February 24, President Putin ordered an invasion of Ukraine. Prior to the invasion, on February 21, President Putin signed decrees recognizing the independence of the so-called Luhansk and Donetsk People’s Republics (LNR and DNR) in eastern Ukraine. Russia immediately started deploying more troops into the LNR and DNR under the guise of “peacekeepers”. The UN Secretary General described it as a “death blow to the Minsk Agreements”. On March 2, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution on “Aggression in Ukraine”, with overwhelming support and 96 co-sponsors from all regions. On March 1, Canada referred the situation in Ukraine to the International Criminal Court (ICC) with 38 other ICC member states as a result of numerous allegations by the commission of serious international crimes in Ukraine by Russian forces, including war crimes and crimes against humanity.
President Putin’s war of choice against Ukraine continues with rocket attacks on civilian targets across the country but has increasingly focused its ground offensive in the east, including the targeting of civilians, civilian infrastructure, and nuclear facilities. President Putin’s military invasion has been paired with significant malicious cyber operations as well as propaganda and disinformation campaigns, falsely claiming that Ukraine and the West are the aggressors and supporting a “biological war against Russia”, and that Ukraine is developing nuclear weapons and persecuting Russian speakers. As Putin escalates his invasion, he seeks to dominate the information environment and manipulate facts and information surrounding events on the ground.
It is challenging to determine the number of Russian casualties given chaotic battlefield conditions and Russian secrecy surrounding military deaths. Reliable sources estimate that as of July, more than 20,000 Russian troops have been killed in the war so far, and several tens of thousands wounded.
Operation REASSURANCE
- Operation REASSURANCE is Canada’s largest international military commitment, involving the deployment of land, sea, and air elements to Central and Eastern Europe in support of our Allies, and the reinforcement of NATO’s Eastern Flank.
- Approximately 1,000 Canadian Armed Forces members are deployed in support of Operation REASSURANCE.
- Canada is responsible for leading a 10-nation multinational battle group, and for coordinating with Latvia and the contributing nations to set the tone, pace, and vision for the Enhanced Forward Presence.
- We have committed to deploying a CAF general officer and six staff officers to Multinational Division North, NATO’s Divisional Headquarters supporting the enhanced Forward Presence – Latvia Battle Group.
- In addition, a total of eight CF-18s have deployed to Romania and are scheduled to begin their mission in early August.
- Two C-130J tactical aircraft, along with an air detachment of up to 50 CAF personnel, are also supporting Allied and partner efforts in Europe, and have transported over three million pounds of military donations since late February 2022.
- Further, HMCS Kingston and HMCS Summerside are currently serving on a four-month deployment in the Baltic Sea and North Atlantic region until October 2022.
- The Canadian Armed Forces maintains a presence in Poland to support Global Affairs Canada in Eastern Europe.
- We will continue working with our Allies and partners to support the people of Ukraine.
If pressed on additional NATO support:
- National Defence has placed approximately 3,400 personnel at a higher state of readiness to deploy to the NATO Response Force should these forces be required.
Key facts
- June 29, 2022: The Minister of National Defence signed a joint declaration with the Latvian Prime Minister and the Minister for Defence, to augment NATO’s enhanced Forward Presence Latvia. Going forward, Canada will:
- Continue to lead NATO forces as the Framework Nation of Latvia;
- Work with Latvia and NATO Allies to generate and stage forces in order to surge to a combat capable brigade;
- Establish and lead elements of a forward brigade command and control, and;
- Be prepared to provide critical capabilities to operations, such as ammunition and explosives, air defence systems, and anti- tank weapons systems.
- The battle group is comprised of a mechanized infantry company, an artillery battery, a combat support company, and a combat service support company.
- Air Task Force Romania: The Air Task Force will conduct 24/7 Air Policing missions using a six aircraft rotation until December 2, 2022, and two additional aircraft have been temporarily deployed for concurrent NATO training activities.
- Standing NATO Mine Countermeasure Group 1: HMCS Summerside deployed with an embarked Royal Canadian Navy clearance diving team, supported by mine countermeasure search capabilities using autonomous underwater vehicles aboard HMCS Kingston.
Support for Ukraine (Operation UNIFIER)
- In the face of Russia’s full scale-invasion of Ukraine, we are working closely with our Allies and partners to help Ukraine defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
- Since February 2022, Canada has committed or delivered $626 million in military assistance to Ukraine, which includes the complete allocation of $500 million in military support for Ukraine announced in Budget 2022.
- This military assistance includes M777 howitzer artillery guns with replacement barrels and compatible ammunition; specialized drone cameras and Armoured Combat Support Vehicles; and associated training.
- Most recently, we also announced that Canada will donate six additional L3 Wescam drone cameras, and is in the process of finalizing negotiations to provide up to 39 armoured combat support vehicles.
- This completed Budget 2022’s allocation of $500 million in military support for Ukraine.
- Canada has also set up a Coalition Air Bridge with two tactical aircraft to Europe to transport military equipment from Canada and our Allies and partners towards Ukraine.
- I am proud to note that these aircraft have now delivered three million pounds of aid so far, and this work is ongoing.
- All of these actions complement our efforts under Operation UNIFIER, where the Canadian Armed Forces conducted more than 700 course serials, and trained over 33,000 members of Ukraine’s security forces from 2015 to January 2022.
- We remain committed to the people of Ukraine and working with our Allies and partners to support Ukraine in meaningful ways.
If pressed on the provision of further military aid to Ukraine:
- We continue to analyze options to provide further aid to support Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in effective and meaningful ways.
- Given operational security concerns, we cannot discuss further specifics at this time.
Key facts
- Military Aid Funding:
- Committed in Budget 2022: $500M
- Total committed since February 2022: $626M
- Recent Military Aid:
- Six additional L3 Wescam drone cameras
- 10 replacement barrels to enable the sustainment of M777 howitzer artillery guns
- Over 20,000 artillery rounds of 155 mm NATO standard ammunition, including fuses and charge bag
- We are in the process of finalizing negotiations to provide up to 39 armoured combat support vehicles, including elements for repairs and servicing
- Military Aid Provided since February 2022:
- Personal protective equipment such as body armour, gas masks, helmets, and other highly specialized pieces of military equipment
- Anti-armour weapons systems and rocket launchers
- Approximately 400,000 individual meal packs
- Small arms and ammunition
- Funding for modern satellite imagery
- Heavy artillery from existing Canadian Armed Forces inventory
- Drone cameras
- Commercial pattern armoured vehicles
- Military Equipment Provided From 2015 to January 2022:
- Body armour
- Mobile field hospitals
- Communications gear
- Explosive disposal equipment
War crimes committed by Russian forces
- Canada continues to work with Ukraine and like-minded partners to hold Russia accountable for its invasion of Ukraine and the alleged atrocities being committed.
- Canada is advocating for different international accountability efforts including the investigation by the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Commission of Inquiry established by the UN Human Rights Council and the OSCE Moscow Mechanism.
- Canada supports Ukraine’s case against Russia at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which seeks to establish that Russia has no lawful basis to take military action in Ukraine on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of genocide. We are working towards an intervention in these proceedings.
Supplementary messages
- Canada is supporting international legal efforts to ensure accountability, including through a State referral made to the International Criminal Court (ICC), and deployments of personnel and cash contributions to support the ICC with its investigations. Canada is also working towards an intervention in the proceedings instituted by Ukraine against Russia at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) under the Genocide Convention.
- The RCMP and the Department of Justice have initiated a structural investigation collecting evidence from Ukrainians who have fled the conflict and come to Canada.
- Canada is working closely with like-minded, particularly the EU and U.S. which are coordinating international assistance to the Ukrainian Office of the Prosecutor-General (e.g., equipment; capacity building; legal advice).
- Canada is supporting efforts to increase the resilience and responsiveness of the National Police of Ukraine (NPU) to address conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) through improved in-service training, communications, and peer-to-peer psychological support mechanisms.
- Canada also agreed, along with other participants at the Ukraine Accountability Conference in the Netherlands, to work towards the establishment of an international Dialogue Group on Accountability for Ukraine.
Supporting facts and figures
- State referral to the ICC: Canada, along with several other State Parties to the ICC, referred the situation in Ukraine to the Prosecutor of the ICC in early March. As the preliminary examination of the situation in Ukraine had already concluded, this State referral enabled the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) to immediately open an investigation into the situation in Ukraine, enabling immediate evidence collection and preservation. An ICC OTP investigation team has been deployed to Ukraine.
- Deployments to the ICC: Through the Canadian Police Arrangement (CPA), co-led by GAC/Peace and Stabilization Operations Program (PSOPs), RCMP and Public Safety, Canada is increasing deployments from 3 to 10 RCMP investigators who will be allocated according to ICC priorities. 9 of the 10 investigators will be deployed by the end of July. Through PSOPs funding to UN Women, Canada is exploring the potential deployment of either an investigator for CRSV, with expertise in crimes against children or a psychosocial support expert for CRSV victim-witnesses (deployment potentially ready for July).
- Cash contribution to the ICC: PSOPs has provided $1,000,000 to the Trust Fund of the ICC OTP for the enhancement of dedicated and specialised capacity with respect to investigations into crimes related to sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) and crimes against children.
- RCMP investigation: The RCMP, under the purview of the Department of Justice War Crimes Program, is collecting information from Ukrainians who have fled to Canada regarding what they witnessed and experienced. The investigation will store and preserve information which can be used to inform future domestic and international criminal investigations. [REDACTED].
- Intervention at the ICJ: Canada is working with like-minded countries to support Ukraine’s case against Russia at the ICJ. Specifically, Canada coordinated a joint statement of support (released on May 20, 43 signatories) and joined a joint statement expressing an intention to intervene (released on July 13, 44 signatories). In its case before the ICJ, Ukraine argues that Russia has no lawful basis to invade Ukraine on the basis of false claims of genocide.
- International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine: Canada supported the UN Human Rights Council resolution establishing an International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine, investigating violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. Between June 7-16, the Commission undertook its first official visit to Ukraine. Through PSOPs funding to UN Women, Canada enabled the deployment of a gender advisor to the start-up team of the Commission; and is exploring the deployment of an interpreter (Ukrainian-Russian-English), specialized in interviews with SGBV victim-survivors (ASAP to March 2023).
- OSCE Moscow Mechanism: On June 2, the Organization for Security and Co- operation in Europe (OSCE) participating States invoked, once again, the Moscow Mechanism to consider, follow up and build upon the findings of the Moscow Mechanism report released on April 13 addressing the human rights and humanitarian impacts of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The second report, which was released on July 14, largely confirmed the conclusions reached in the first report.
- Accountability Conference: Justice Minister Lametti attended the Accountability Conference hosted by the Netherlands, the ICC and the EU in The Hague on July 13-14. The conference was co-sponsored by Canada as well as the UK, the US and Denmark. Discussions focus on 3 themes: (1) Coherence of actions; (2) Ensuring evidence collected can be put before courts; and (3) Prioritizing the interests and needs of survivors and victims of core international crimes. The outcome document commits to work towards the establishment of a Dialogue Group to promote dialogue and enhance coherence of action where appropriate.
Background
Russia continues its campaign of aggression against Ukraine, with allegations being made that it continues to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity. In this regard, the report of the OSCE fact finding mission, that was released on April 13, found clear patterns of violations of humanitarian law by Russian forces, and the commission of war crimes. Particularly alarming has been credible reports that Russian forces have committed widespread conflict-related sexual violence.
Canada-Germany bilateral and commercial relations
- Canada and Germany have a strong bilateral partnership, based on shared values and like-minded views on a wide range of global issues.
- As allies, we have worked closely together to ensure G7 and NATO unity in face of Russia’s unjustified invasion of Ukraine.
- We collaborate on climate change, including our shared effort to expand the global adoption of carbon pricing.
- The August visit of Chancellor [Olaf] Scholz will allow Canada and Germany to further our cooperation on energy security, climate change and clean technologies.
- The Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement [CETA] is the foundation for a privileged trading relationship with Germany, our fifth largest trading partner.
Supporting facts and figures
- PM Trudeau attendance at G7 Leaders Summit (Elmau, Germany): June 26-28; Bilateral Visit: March 9.
- Your visits to Germany: G7 Foreign Ministers Meeting (Lübeck): May 2022; attendance at Moldova Support Platform meeting (Berlin): April 5; accompanied PM Trudeau on March 2022 visit.
- Germany is Canada’s fifth largest trading partner. 2021: exports totalled $6.9 billion (8% increase from 2020); imports totalled $19 billion (10.2% increase from 2021).
- CETA: provisional application since September 2017. Not yet ratified by Germany but recently went through first reading in Germany’s lower chamber and a fall 2022 ratification appears likely.
Background
Carbon pricing and the “Climate Club”: The “Climate Club” is a G7 initiative developed by Chancellor Scholz in August 2021 (during Germany’s federal election campaign) and elevated in December to a G7 priority. The “club” would create a coalition of countries committed to comparable standards to protect member-states industries from competitors with less stringent climate policies. Members would coordinate how they measure carbon; would cooperate on decarbonizing their industrial sectors; and could implement tariffs on high-carbon imports to create a level playing field to prevent industries from moving to countries with lower climate ambition. On June 28, all G7 countries issued a joint statement supporting the Climate Club at the conclusion of the Elmau Summit.
As part of the Global Carbon Pricing Challenge (GCPC), PM Trudeau has consistently called on countries to implement pollution pricing measures, which have been effective in reducing emissions in Canada. The GCPC includes a goal of covering 60% of global emissions by a price on carbon by 2030.
Coordination on Ukraine War: As NATO and G7 members, Canada and Germany have been coordinating closely on the Russia-Ukraine issue since November 2021, when Russia began its large-scale build-up of troops on the border with Ukraine. Since Russia’s invasion, coordination has continued particularly with respect to sanctions, provision of weapons, diplomatic and consular issues (e.g. embassy closures and re- opening), humanitarian assistance, refugees and plans for reconstruction in Ukraine.
On 26 February, Chancellor Scholz delivered his historic Zeitenwende (“Turning Point”) speech to the Bundestag, during which he announced key changes to Germany’s defence policy, including allowing export of offensive and heavy weapons to Ukraine, as well as a strong transition away from Russian energy imports, which has proven painful for Germany given its reliance on Russian oil and gas.
Assistance to Ukraine
According to information on the German Foreign Federal Office’s website, since 2014, Germany has been one of the world’s largest providers of bilateral assistance to Ukraine. Before February 2014, this consisted almost entirely of financial, development (including peace and stabilization) and financial assistance. Since Russia’s invasion, German military assistance has expanded rapidly to include training on and provision of heavy weapons.
From 2014 to February 2022, German assistance totalled approximately EUR 2 billion, including:
- More than EURO 1 billion in development assistance;
- EUR 500 million within a credit guarantee framework;
- EUR 44 million for peace and stabilization support (under Germany’s engagement in the Normandy format mediation process)
- EUR 186 million for explosive ordnance clearance and pandemic response; and
- EUR 175 million earmarked for Ukraine under the Germany-US Green Fund (itself part of the Germany-Ukraine Energy Partnership, which implements projects focused on renewable energies. hydrogen, transition away from coal, energy efficiency and decarbonisation.
Since February 2022, Germany has committed in additional EUR 4 billion military, humanitarian and financial assistance to Ukraine. Specific weapons (including training) and equipment provided has included:
- 10 “Panzerhaubitze” self-propelled howitzers (including spare parts and 155 mm projectiles) in a joint project with the Netherlands;
- 21 M113 armoured personnel carriers;
- 5 Gepard self-propelled anti-aircraft tanks;
- 3 Mars multiple launch rockets systems (including ammunition);
- 3,000 anti-tank weapons (including 900 firing devices);
- 500 Stinger air-defence systems;
- 280 vehicles (including trucks and all-terrain vehicles);
- 50 “bunker buster” missiles; and
- 43 reconnaissance drones.
CETA: CETA has been in force provisionally since September 2017. This includes tariff elimination and commitments in services trade, government procurement and temporary entry of business persons, as well as chapters on labour, the environment, and trade and sustainable development, among others. On July 7, Germany’s governing Ampel Coalition tabled a draft CETA ratification bill at the Bundestag (Germany’s lower chamber) for a first reading. A fully ratified CETA would provide certainty for the future of the agreement and the trading relationship, and would see additional elements of the agreement, such as the provisions on investment protection, enter into force. To date, 16 of 27 EU member states have ratified the agreement, including most recently, the Netherlands.
Chancellor Scholz Visit: The visit was officially announced at the G7 Elmau Summit and will take place August 21-23. The visit will highlight the strong, strategic and friendly bilateral relationship.
Energy Security
- Canada continues to work with its partners in supporting Ukraine and ensuring global energy security in light of the unprovoked invasion by Russia.
- The Government of Canada granted a permit to allow the return of the turbine to Germany because it was asked to do so by the German government. The decision was supported by our European and American allies who judged that it was necessary to ensure German and European energy security.
- We will not stop imposing severe costs on the Putin regime while their unjustifiable invasion is ongoing, and we will continue to support our European friends and allies by working to help stabilize energy markets and develop long- term and sustainable solutions on energy supplies.
- That is why we announced a plan to increase oil and gas output to 300,000 barrels per day to assist the EU in displacing Russian energy and easing global energy prices.
- And why we are developing options in the longer-term to increase our capacity to export LNG and hydrogen to support the energy security of our allies as they pursue energy transition goals.
Supplementary messages
- Europe is focused on replacing Russian energy imports with those from other countries while simultaneously reducing consumption and accelerating a longer-term transition towards renewables and hydrogen.
- Canada will continue to assess what more it can do but will do so in a manner that aligns with its 2030 and 2050 climate commitments.
- The current price volatility in international energy markets will not be a short- term issue. This means that we need to recognize that maintaining energy security, affordability and accessibility will be fundamental to enabling an orderly transition to net zero.
Supporting facts and figures
- Russia is the world’s third largest producer of oil, behind the US and Saudi Arabia, and the largest exporter of oil and oil products to global markets. Prior to its invasion of Ukraine, Russia was exporting 7.7 million barrels per day (mb/d), of which 4.9 mb/d was crude oil and 2.8 mb/d was refined products. Of this amount, Europe imported 3.5 mb/d of crude oil and refined products, accounting for 45% of Russia’s oil exports and 35% of the EU’s net oil imports.
- In response to Russia’s invasion, Canada banned imports of Russian oil, petroleum products and professional services that support Russia’s petroleum industry.
- On March 24, Canada announced an increase in incremental supply of up to 300,000 boe/d (including 200,000 b/d of crude oil and 100,000 boe/d of natural gas) that could be supplied to global markets by end of this year, primarily by pulling forward supply planned to come online in 2023.
- This increased oil and gas production is likely to flow via existing pipeline and rail infrastructure to the US Gulf Coast, where Canada’s heavy crude can be refined for US domestic consumption or exported to Europe.
- Canada’s ability to provide Europe with near term support in its efforts to replace Russian crude oil and oil product imports (especially diesel) is limited although we are developing options to increase our capacity to export LNG and hydrogen to support the energy security of our allies as they pursue energy transition goals.
Background
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent sanctioning of Moscow by Western governments has significantly increased global energy market volatility at a time when markets were already facing uncertainty and growing structural deficit from underinvestment in both conventional and clean energy.
Even before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, there was an undersupply of oil due to several years of underinvestment in upstream production and export infrastructure, the impact of COVID-19, and production restraint by OPEC+ countries. The combination of an undersupplied market and strong demand recovery was already driving energy cost increases prior to the Russian invasion, especially in Europe.
Efforts to displace Russian crude are prompting a realignment of global energy markets. Although data suggests that trade flows of Russian oil are being redirected towards Asia, it remains unclear whether Asian buyers can make up for the volumes that would compensate for declining European purchases.
A combination of sanctions against Moscow and pre-existing undersupply issues is having a significant impact on the global economy. Oil prices spiked in mid-March, but have since dropped, though benchmark prices remain above $100 per barrel.
Increased energy costs are also contributing to record inflation. In March 2022, year over year inflation rates were 6.7% in Canada, 8.5% in the US, and 7.5% in the Euro area.
To address concern over global supply issues and calm volatile global oil markets, the IEA took two separate collective actions for a total emergency stock release of about 1 mb/d over the April to September period, or total commitments of 182.7 million barrels (mb).
As a net oil exporting country, Canada is not obligated to hold emergency stocks and thus did not participate in either stock release noted above. However, Canada is fully supportive of the collective action taken by IEA members.
Value of Russian assets seized in Canada
- To date, no property owned or controlled by sanctioned Russian persons has been seized.
- From February 24 to June 7, 2022, approximately $123 million of property has been effectively frozen, but as I stated, no property has been seized.
- Under recent amendments to SEMA, the seizure of property is ordered by the Governor in Council.
Supplementary messages
- On June 23rd, amendments to SEMA came into force to allow for the seizure and forfeiture of property owned by sanctioned Russian persons.
- In order for the Government of Canada to forfeit property under SEMA, an application must be made to a judge.
- While Global Affairs is responsible for enforcement of SEMA, other government departments play a role in disclosing information on property suspected to be controlled or owned by a person listed in the SEMA Russian Regulations.
- Transactions equal to approximately $289 million Canadian have been blocked as a result of the prohibitions in the SEMA Russia Regulations.
Background
As part of specific efforts to assist the Ukranian government and people in their fight against the current Russian invasion, Canada joined with the European Commission, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States in a cooperative effort to target Russian assets. This effort, known as the Russian Elites, Proxies and Oligarchs (REPO) multilateral task force, was announced formally on March 16, 2022. The Government of Canada’s overall objective as part of the REPO taskforce is to counter Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine and hold those responsible for that invasion to account.
An important part of these efforts is the implementation and updating of sanctions that were enacted pursuant to subsection 4(1) to (3) of the Special Economic Measures Act (SEMA). The Government of Canada has imposed sanctions on a number of individuals and entities as listed under the Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations (the Regulations). The individuals and entities listed in the Regulations have been included for their complicity in, facilitating, enabling or otherwise supporting Russia’s illegal invasion. The Regulations first came into force on March 17, 2014, and were last amended on April 8, 2022. A similar piece of legislation, the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Sergei Magnitsky Law) (JVCFOA) received royal assent on October 18, 2017.
SEMA and its Regulations and the JVCFOA allows the Governor in Council (GIC) to make orders and regulations to restrict dealings in property and freeze the assets of foreign nationals, if the GIC is of the opinion that certain circumstances have occurred.Footnote 1 These are key tools to help the Government achieve its overall objectives. On June 23rd, 2022, amendments to SEMA and JVCFOA to allow for seizure and forfeiture of assets came into force.
Nord Stream 1 Turbine Chronology – Summary of Media Reports
August 2: The G7 foreign ministers release a statement on energy security that condemns Russian attempts to weaponize its energy exports and pledges to work together to mitigate the impact of energy supply disruptions.
August 1: As Germany prepares for winter, some are voicing concern about potential social unrest, rationing and recession. If energy conservation methods fail, the German government may take control of gas distribution; German Chancellor Olaf Scholz says Trudeau called Russia's bluff by allowing the turbines to be returned; Debate in Germany is rising over whether the country should switch off its last three nuclear power plants.
July 31: President of the Business Council of Canada writes that Canada must “do more to export critical resources to countries we count as allies.” including increasing the infrastructure needed to access global markets. He says Canada’s critical energy infrastructure would strengthen energy security for Canada and its allies, as well as improve global environmental security.
July 29: Gazprom's senior manager says the delivery of a Nord Stream 1 gas turbine to Germany after maintenance was not in line with the contract, stepping up Gazprom’s criticism of Siemens Energy; A fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute writes that to survive this energy crisis, Europe needs to: increase natural gas production in the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands, extend Germany’s nuclear power plants’ lifespan, and form new partnerships with global energy suppliers; The latest drop in the Russian gas supply (to 20%) may disrupt Asia’s energy security and could trigger Asia to back away from LNG.
July 28: Autocratic leaders around the world are being approached by EU countries as potential sources of energy; Ukraine's ambassador to Canada says gas supply cuts to Europe prove that the sanctions waiver should not have been granted; CBC notes that neither Natural Resources Canada nor Global Affairs Canada responded directly when asked whether the Trudeau government was considering revoking the waiver; CPC MP Greg McLean writes that while Germany finds itself hostage to Russia, Canada’s government persists with its “aimless and divisive” energy policies.
July 27: Gazprom cuts the Nord Stream 1 gas supply to 20%; Biden’s administration is said to be “working furiously behind the scenes” to keep European allies united against Russia.
July 26: Kremlin says Nord Stream 1 still en route and second turbine is problematic; Announcement that Gazprom has to switch off a turbine; EU energy ministers OK draft document to drop gas demand by 15% (some say it’s watered down legislation); Anonymous source says some countries may resist gas sacrifices; 2 Cdn opinion columns – first says that Trudeau missed opportunity to lead LNG globally, second says pursuit of green energy/forfeit of energy security led to Europe to restart coal plants.
July 25: Gazprom says it will reduce gas supplies to Europe to 20% on July 27; Gazprom says it’s received paperwork about turbine delivery delay, but that other countries’ sanctions could still make the turbine hard to maintain; Siemens says Russia has the key to finalizing turbine delivery; Zelenskyy says Putin waging a gas war against Europe.
July 22: Russia says turbine delivery isn’t hitting snags; German natural gas company takes bailout from its government; Cost of gas in Europe rises because of delivery snag and higher German gas storage targets.
July 21: Nord Stream 1 restarts at 30-40% flow capacity; Missing turbine is stuck in Germany – could take weeks to get to Russia; German economy minister announces emergency measures to cut gas consumption.
July 20: Putin accuses Canada of turbine delay and eyeing market for itself; Gazprom says it still needs Siemens’ documentation to reinstall turbine; Cdn media say turbine’s in transit; Media report a draft EU emergency plan says countries need to cut gas demand by 10-15%; Germany more worried about cost than supply of gas, some suggest recession; German foreign affairs minister says Berlin told Ottawa that Germany might suspend military/economic aid to Ukraine unless Nord Stream 1 is returned; German Ambassador to Canada says she’s lobbying Ottawa to grant sanctions waiver for turbines; International Working Group on Russian Sanctions states it disagrees with Canada’s decision to return turbines.
July 19: Sources say Gazprom will restart a lowered Nord Stream 1 gas flow on July 21; Putin warns of continuing gas supply problems in late July – as little as 20% of full capacity; Putin says other pumping units could cause supply problems and need more maintenance; EU budget commissioner says the bloc assumes flow won’t restart and German government says it won’t assume anything yet; Sources say gas flow should return July 21 but at low flow; Gazprom says it can’t guarantee gas supply even with turbine return; European leaders are said to be resisting Ukraine’s call for tougher sanctions so they can replenish gas stocks for upcoming winter weather; Retired Gen. Rick Hillier says returning the turbines risks undermining efforts to punish Russia, and attention is waning for war in Ukraine; American Generals support Trudeau government’s turbine decision.
July 18: A Moscow newspaper says sources have said that Canada sent the turbines to Germany on July 17, and it will take another 10 days to get to Russia and be installed; Sources say Gazprom is ready declare retroactive force majeure, heightening fears the pipeline will stay offline; Ukraine’s former ambassador to Canada says the country is making a big mistake and is naïve to think the turbines’ return will help secure Europe’s energy needs; Germany considers keeping its three remaining nuclear plants going past it’s original 2022 shutdown date; Exports of Russian energy to China appear to be growing.
July 17: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy; A PMO readout afterwards doesn’t mention sanctions, nor the release of the turbines. It notes the two discussed the “importance of maintaining strong unity amongst allies and continuing to impose severe costs on Russia in the face of its illegal and unjustifiable invasion of Ukraine”; Other media reports say that Zelenskyy told Prime Minister Trudeau that Ukrainians “would never accept” Canada's decision to return the Nord Stream 1 turbine because it would encourage more sanctions violations.
July 16: Gazprom says it asked Siemens for turbine transit documentation on July 15; Chrystia Freeland confirms her approval of the turbines’ return; Some Ukranians say Canada’s turbine decision is wrong.
July 15: Senior Liberal ministers agree to explain the turbine decision at a special FAAE session; FAAE asks for other witnesses: German, Ukrainian and EU ambassadors, plus Ukranian Cdn. Congress witness; CPC critic Michael Chong proposes other witnesses, such as Freeland “[who’s] been silent and invisible”.
July 13: Min. Wilkinson says starting a German nuclear reactor doesn’t solve gas problems; Trudeau says turbine decision was difficult but necessary; Unnamed GAC officials say the turbine sanction exemptions are for up to two years; Russia says the shutdown is for routine maintenance, but observers say the shutdown is to retaliate against sanctions; Analysts expect the pipeline shutdown will go beyond the maintenance dates; German economic ministry won’t comment about Gazprom’s July 13 statement about needing documentation.
July 12: The Ukrainian World Congress and Ukrainian Canadian Congress urge the federal government to reconsider its turbine decision with statements and Cdn columnists are critical of decision.
July 11: Germany welcomes Canada’s turbine decision; Zelenskyy says decision is unacceptable; Ukraine ministries express deep disappointment; Canada’s Parliamentarians debate the turbine decision; U.S. backs turbine decision; Indirect turbine return route will start with Germany, then to Russia; Nord Stream announces the maintenance shutdown (July 11-21).
July 10: Wilkinson’s press secretary confirms there are six turbines at issue; Canadians of Ukrainian origin protest decision.
July 9: Wilkinson announces Siemens to get permit to return turbines.
July 8: Source says Canada/Germany turbine deal is close; German chancellor’s spokesperson says signals from Canada are positive re. turbine return; Ukrainian embassy says it hopes Canada stays on course with all sanctions; Media notes that Russia isn’t compensating for reduced gas supply during maintenance like it has before; Kremlin spokesperson says gas volumes might be boosted through Nord Stream on July 21 if the turbines are returned.
July 7: Germany’s vice-chancellor appeals to Ottawa to release turbines; Germany’s ambassador to Ottawa recognizes pressure on Ottawa from Ukraine; Germany’s ambassador to Ottawa mentions German trade delegation will come August 22-23 to discuss East Coast LNG export facilities replacing some Russian gas.
July 5: Canada’s hope for LNG exports rekindled at June’s G7 summit.
July 4: Germany’s energy regulator asks residents to save energy; Germany considers amendments to energy security laws; Germany’s energy suppliers face soaring costs due to Russia’s reductions.
June 28: German Chancellor defends G7’s softening on commitments to end public support for fossil fuels.
June 23: Germany activates second phase of its three-stage emergency plan for natural gas supplies.
June 17: Russia enters third day of gas flow cuts to Italy, Slovakia, France, Germany, and Austria. Prices soar; Russia says reductions are because of a technical problem; turbine(s) allegedly stranded in Montreal because of sanctions.
June 14: Gazprom says Nord Stream 1’s gas will drop by 40% because of the sanctioned turbine. Germany not too worried.
May: Siemens announces it’s exiting Russia over war in Ukraine. April: Media notes Germany is the biggest buyer of Russian oil. March: U.S. ramps up LNG shipments to Europe to reduce reliance on Russian oil; Sanctions are reported to be hurting Russia’s economy. February: Russia invades Ukraine. January: Media report on controversial not-yet-operational Nord Stream 2 pipeline that may send Russian gas to Germany, Germans may include the second pipeline as a way to hurt Moscow for threatening Ukraine.
Nord Stream 1 Turbine Chronology / Key Quotes
AUGUST 2
The G7 foreign ministers release a statement on energy security that condemns Russian attempts to weaponize its energy exports and pledges to work together to mitigate the impact of energy supply disruptions.
“In considering this and other options, we will also consider mitigation mechanisms alongside our restrictive measures to ensure the most vulnerable and impacted countries maintain access to energy markets including from Russia.”
“We welcome efforts by partners with the aim of replenishing gas reserves and increasing energy security and resilience, amid Russia’s increased weaponization of energy.”
AUGUST 1
Germany is already well into preparations for the upcoming winter, when its citizens will likely experience a massive drop in Russian energy supply. Some are voicing concern about potential social unrest during the hardship. Rationing and recession are also looming for Germany as electricity prices jump to record heights. If energy conservation methods fail, the German government may declare a gas emergency that allows them to take control of gas distribution.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz says Trudeau called Russia's bluff by allowing the turbines repaired in Canada to be returned to Moscow's state-controlled Gazprom, arguing that this move eliminated a pretext for Russia President Vladimir Putin to reduce or stop deliveries of natural gas to Europe. Criticism around the turbines’ return is “baseless,” says Scholz, who adds that he’d welcome LNG supplies from Canada.
Debate in Germany is rising over whether the country should switch off its last three nuclear power plants as planned at the end of this year. The door to some kind of extension appeared to open a crack after the Economy Ministry in mid-July announced a new "stress test" on the security of electricity supplies.
JULY 31
Goldy Hyder, president of the Business Council of Canada, writes an opinion piece that says Canada must “do more to export critical resources to countries we count as allies,” including increasing the infrastructure needed to access global markets. Hyder says that Canada isn’t seen as dependable in diplomatic circles right now, and that developing Canada’s critical energy infrastructure would strengthen energy security for Canada and it’s allies, as well as improve global environmental security, since Canada is committed to reducing emissions and climate change.
JULY 29
Gazprom's senior manager says the delivery of a Nord Stream 1 gas turbine to Germany from Canada after maintenance was not in line with the contract, stepping up Gazprom’s criticism of turbine manufacturer Siemens Energy. The comments deepen the ongoing argument in which Russia has cited turbine problems as its reason for cutting gas supply via Nord Stream 1 — its main gas link to Europe — to just 20% of capacity.
Gazprom's deputy chief executive also said Russia had complained repeatedly to Siemens about problems with other turbines. Instead of responding, Siemens cited previous comments it’s made – that it has no access to on- site turbines and hasn’t received any damage reports from Gazprom.
A fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute writes that Europe should be able to withstand Russia’s energy threats, but it needs to urgently take steps to secure alternative supplies. He says that a recession is all but guaranteed and analysts predict that the EU won’t be able to reach its gas-storage target of 80%. He suggests that Europe can improve supplies by: increasing natural gas production in the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands, instead of taking the field offline next year over earthquake risks and environmentalists’ pressure; extending Germany’s nuclear power plants’ lifespan; and forming new partnerships with global energy suppliers.
The latest drop in the Russian gas supply (to 20%) may disrupt Asia’s energy security and could trigger Asia to back away from LNG. South Korea and Japan are anxious there will be energy hoarding, intensifying competition for LNG. Developing countries, especially those in South Asia, are struggling to compete with competitors among soaring energy prices – Pakistan and Sri Lanka have both been deeply affected.
“We see the risk of permanent LNG demand destruction in some countries that could hang on to coal and fuel oil and jump straight to renewables a few years down the road. That is unless more competitively priced LNG is made available to them soon”
JULY 28
Autocratic leaders around the world are being approached by EU countries as potential sources of energy as Europe looks to wean off the Russian supply. These alternative sources are not necessarily ethical, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Algeria and Iran, which rank low in the Human Freedom Index.
Yulia Kovaliv, Ukraine's ambassador to Canada, says Moscow’s cuts to gas supply to Europe prove that the sanctions waiver for the Nord Stream 1 turbines should not have been granted in the first place.
“This decision of waiving sanctions actually did not have any practical impact on helping the European countries, first of all Germany, to secure their gas supply. Instead we see the next steps of Gazprom blackmailing their European consumers. Gazprom, we believe, took all the steps to provide the evidence that this permission needs to be removed.”
The CBC notes that Natural Resources Canada, which granted the waiver, was “heavily critical” of the latest move by Gazprom but that neither it nor Global Affairs Canada responded directly when asked whether the Trudeau government was considering revoking the waiver in response.
“The Russian regime and its propaganda arms are clearly creating additional false pretexts to further and deliberately cause energy instability across Europe in an attempt to sow division amongst allies, as it continues to wage its unjustifiable war against Ukraine. We see through their lies. The only thing that would prevent gas from flowing to Europe is (Russian President Vladimir) Putin.”
CPC MP Greg McLean (Calgary Centre, Shadow Minister for Natural Resources), writes in the National Post that while Germany finds itself hostage to Russia, Canada’s government persists with its “aimless and divisive” energy policies. McLean says the fact that Canada can’t deliver needed energy to its allies is Canada’s own policy failure, and that the current government seems oblivious to the consequences, “including capital flows to a hostile regime; manipulation of resource flow and pricing; Canadian diplomatic irrelevance.”
JULY 27
Citing equipment repairs, Gazprom cuts the amount of natural gas flowing through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline to 20 per cent of capacity, halving the 40 per cent capacity at which it was flowing after a July 21 re-start.
“Gas is now a part of Russian foreign policy and possibly Russian war strategy.”
The administration of U.S. President Joe Biden is said to be “working furiously behind the scenes” to keep European allies united against Russia as Moscow further cuts energy supply to the European Union. An unidentified US official says the move was retaliation for western sanctions and puts the West in “unchartered territory” when it comes to addressing gas supply through the winter. The White House is said to have sent presidential coordinator for global energy Amos Hochstein to Europe on July 26 to discuss contingency planning with the US-EU energy task force created in March.
“Russia's energy coercion has put pressure on energy markets, raised prices for consumers, and threatened global energy security. These actions only underscore the importance of the work the United States and the European Commission are doing to end our reliance on Russian energy. We will continue working with our European partners to reduce dependence on Russian energy and support their efforts to prepare for further Russian destabilization of energy markets.”
JULY 26
- The Kremlin says the Nord Stream 1 turbine has not yet arrived from Canada and a second turbine is showing defects:
“Yes, indeed, there are some defects with the turbines. The turbine has not arrived after a major maintenance, it's on its way. We hope that it will happen... sooner rather than later. The situation is critically complicated by the restrictions and sanctions, which had been imposed against our country.”
- Both Peskov and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov confirm Gazprom will have to switch off a turbine at the Portovaya compressor station “due to security reasons”.
- European Union energy ministers approve draft legislation designed to lower demand for gas by 15% from August 2022 through March 2023, with voluntary national steps to reduce consumption but also a trigger for mandatory actions across the 27-member EU if voluntary actions do not yield enough savings.
“The EU has taken a decisive step to face down the threat of a full gas disruption.”
“We have a blueprint to act together in a coordinated way. This was a test for the unity and resolve of the union.”
“The energy squeeze is reviving decades-old political challenges over policy coordination. While the EU has gained centralized authority over monetary, trade, antitrust and farm policies, national sovereignty over energy issues still largely prevails.”
- Some media report the EU legislation was “watered down” in negotiations, with opt-outs for island nations and possible exclusions for countries little connected to the European gas network.
- Bloomberg cites an unnamed senior EU diplomat saying some EU countries may resist making “sacrifices” for Germany, which “failed to diversify energy sources while lecturing southern nations on putting their fiscal houses in order.”
- Opinion columns in Canada include: the suggestion that the Trudeau government has prevented Canada from becoming a world leader in LNG exports (“theoretically, Europe would have been dramatically less dependent upon Russian gas than it is now”); the assertion that the “reckless pursuit of so-called 'green energy' and deliberate forfeiting of energy security” has forced Europeans to re-start coal-fired power plants in response to Russia’s throttling of natural gas supply.
JULY 25
Gazprom says it will reduce gas supplies to Europe to just 20% (33M cubic metres per day) of normal capacity starting July 27 at 4 a.m. GMT.
The company says it has “some paperwork” from Siemens Energy AG related to the delayed delivery of the Nord Stream turbine, but additional issues with sanctions remain unaddressed and “key to maintenance of the equipment”.
For its part, Siemens Energy says the transport of the serviced turbine to Russia “could start immediately, and the ball was in Gazprom's court”.
“The German authorities provided Siemens Energy with all the necessary documents for the export of the turbine to Russia at the beginning of last week. Gazprom is aware of this. What is missing, however, are the customs documents for import to Russia. Gazprom, as the customer, is required to provide those.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says Vladimir Putin is waging a “gas war” against Europe:
“Russia is not going to resume gas supplies to European countries, as it is contractually obligated to do. And this is an open gas war, which Russia is waging against a united Europe. They don’t care what will happen to the people, how they will suffer from hunger due to the blocking of ports or from winter cold and poverty.”
JULY 22
Russia rejects news reports that the Nord Stream 1 turbine is stuck in transit, with Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov dismissing it as “nonsense”.
German natural gas importer Uniper says it has agreed to a 15B euro bailout from the German government. The government will take a 30% stake in the company, reducing the ownership of its Finnish parent Fortum to 56% from nearly 80%. The deal allows Uniper to pass on some of the costs of soaring gas prices to consumers in the coming months, something German Chancellor Olaf Scholz says will be offset by government support to poorer households.
Media report impacts on natural gas pricing across Europe because of issues with the Nord Stream 1 pipeline start-up but also because Germany raised its own gas storage targets.
JULY 21
Natural gas starts flowing through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline after the operator “successfully completed all planned maintenance works.” However, flow is well short of full capacity, at between 30% and 40%.
Media report that sources say the “missing turbine” that had been undergoing maintenance in Canada is stuck in transit in Germany because Russia had not given the go-ahead to transport it back. It was flown to Cologne, Germany, on July 17 by logistics firm Challenge Group but the return to Russia could be “days or even weeks”.
“Under normal circumstances, the maintenance of turbines is a routine operation for us. Naturally, we want to transport the turbine to its place of operation as quickly as possible. However, the time it takes is not exclusively within our control.”
“Sometimes one has the impression that Russia no longer wants to take it back. That means the pretext of technical problems actually has a political background, and that is the opposite of being a guarantor for energy security in Europe.”
German Economy Minister Habeck announces a new wave of emergency measures to cut the country’s consumption of gas, including requesting companies allow home working wherever possible to enable heating systems in larger buildings to be turned off, obligations to get rid of inefficient heating systems, and a ban on using gas to heat private pools.
JULY 20
Russian president Vladimir Putin accuses Canada of delaying the return of the Nord Stream turbine by Siemens, saying “Ottawa was eyeing the European market itself”.
Gazprom tweets that it has “still not received documentation from Siemens needed for reinstalling a turbine for the crucial Nord Stream 1 gas pipeline amid sanctions from Canada and the European Union”.
Tweets by CBC and others indicate European Commissioner for Energy Kadri Simson says the turbine is “now in transit”.
Media report on a draft emergency plan by the European Union that warns countries to reduce gas demand by 10-15% over the coming months, saying “without deep cuts now they could struggle for fuel during the winter if Russia cuts off deliveries”. Gazprom has already halted deliveries to some EU states. The draft plan, is said to propose a voluntary target over the next eight months “which could be made legally binding in a supply emergency”.
“Russia is blackmailing us. Russia is using energy as a weapon. And therefore in any event, whether a partial major cutoff of Russian gas or a total cutoff of Russian gas, Europe needs to be ready.”
The Government of Germany says the supply of gas right now is “less of a concern than the cost”, which is already spiking across the EU. Some worry this will cause a recession just as economies start to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Speaking to German media outlet RND on July 20, Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock says Berlin “warned” Ottawa that Germany could be forced to suspend military and economic aid to Ukraine if the Nord Stream pipeline turbine was not returned. She says that if the “missing turbine led to a stoppage of natural gas from Russia, it could spark popular uprisings and force Berlin to halt support for Ukraine”.
When pressed by RND, Baerbock says her comment about civil unrest was “perhaps a bit exaggerated” but she was speaking of a scenario where “we had no more gas.”
“The Canadians said, ‘We have a lot of questions,’ and we said, ‘We can understand that, but if we don’t get the gas turbine, then we won’t get any more gas, and then we won’t be able to provide any support for Ukraine at all, because we’ll be busy with popular uprisings.”
German Ambassador to Canada Sabine Sparwasser tells the CBC that she is lobbying Ottawa to grant the sanctions waiver for all six Nord Stream turbines in Canada for repair, although she acknowledges that “their return won't ensure Russia responds in good faith and restores the full flow of gas”.
“In many, many experts' opinions, it's a pretext. But we take away that pretext. We're delivering the turbine and then we will see whether there is a weaponization of energy by stopping the delivery or not”.
The International Working Group on Russian Sanctions issues a statement disagreeing with the decision taken by the Government of Canada on returning the turbines to Russia, saying the export controls waiver “sets an unacceptable precedent that will only embolden the Putin regime to continue to weaponize its energy leverage over the European continent.”
JULY 19
Bloomberg reports that unnamed people familiar with the matter say Gazprom is “poised to restart” gas exports through Nord Stream 1 on July 21. Shipments would resume after a 10 day maintenance period ends, but remain below normal after the company declared force majeure on some European clients.
Bloomberg also notes that in televised comments after a summit in Iran late July 19, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that “delays in receiving (the turbine)… could lead volumes to be cut to only 20 per cent of capacity as soon as the end of this month, when another unit is due for maintenance”. Putin said, “Only two (turbines) are operating” and if the unit coming back from Canada doesn’t arrive in time to replace the one due to be sent for repairs, he warned, “just one will function, so 30 million cubic meters will be pumped per day.”
Putin says Gazprom was ready to fulfill its obligations on gas exports, but the capacity of Nord Stream 1 could be reduced due to problems with other pumping units, one of which would need to be sent for maintenance on July 26.
EU Budget Commissioner Johannes Hahn says the bloc is “working on the assumption that flows won’t resume”, and the German government says it “will wait until Monday at least before assessing whether flows are going to resume or not. That’s to give more time for the pipeline part to make its way back to Russia from Canada”.
Anonymous sources familiar with Russian export plans tell Reuters that gas flows are expected to restart as scheduled on July 21, although at lower flow than its capacity of 160M cubic meters per day.
Gazprom tells European customers it “cannot guarantee future gas supplies”, even if it receives the repaired turbines shipped from Canada as expected on July 24.
In resisting Ukraine’s call for tougher sanctions, especially with regard to gas supply, European leaders are said to reason “it is best to replenish stocks now while they have a chance, and not give Putin any excuse to cut off the gas later in the winter”.
“And in the past few days, several European leaders have publicly emphasized that it won’t benefit Ukraine if an already severe energy crisis turns even more brutal in the winter, possibly assisted by Putin strangling gas supplies.”
Retired Canadian general Rick Hillier tells an online panel hosted by the Ukrainian World Congress that Canada’s decision to return the newly repaired turbines “risks undermining a united global effort to punish Russia for its war in Ukraine”. He says attention to the war in Ukraine is waning amid economic issues like inflation and peoples’ vacation plans after two years of the pandemic, and the return of the turbines may signal for some that support for Ukraine is no longer a priority.
“In hindsight, (the return of the turbines) may be seen as the straw that broke the camel's back, and we may start to see a relenting of pressure from NATO and from the West in general… Instead of going upwards and onwards with more and more sanctions, this might be the straw that causes it to turn downwards”.
In the same webinar (and “to the embarrassment of the moderator”, the UWC’s Paul Grod), American Generals David Petraeus and Wesley Clark declare support for the Trudeau government’s decision on the turbines.
“I’m in broad agreement with Canada’s decision. It was a very tough one, but they had support from the U.S. and Germany.”
"I think Canada weighed all the options, the information, the pros and the cons, and ultimately made a decision that was in the best interests of all involved. Because if a major country like Germany is deprived of its energy, the cohesion that has been truly extraordinary will be a potential casualty."
“The key is that you have to have resilience. You have to bend but not break..... Accept some diplomacy, some resilience, some flexibility in the application of the sanctions. It's going to work out.”
JULY 18
Reuters reports that the Moscow-based Kommersant newspaper, citing people familiar with the situation, says Canada shipped a turbine(s) for the Nord Stream 1 gas pipeline to Germany on Sunday, July 17, with ferry transport to Germany and land transport to Russia (via Finland) and installation taking another 10 days.
Reuters reports on a letter from Gazprom to at least one “major” gas customer in Europe saying the company would declare force majeure, retroactively to June 14, saying it was unable to fulfill supply obligations through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline owing to what it called the “’extraordinary’
circumstances outside its control”. The letter is said to heighten fear that Russia would keep the pipeline offline in retaliation for sanctions.
In interview, Andriy Vitaliyovych Shevchenko, Ukraine's ambassador to Canada from 2015 to 2021, explains the implications of returning the turbines and why Canada would be “naive to assume the move would be helpful to ensure Europe's energy needs are met”.
“It's a big mistake, and it came as a true shock. In Ukraine, when you mention Canada, you will see a smile on people's faces. That's how we feel about Canada”.
“It's an obvious reversal of policy, and it was the speed of the decision that doesn't sit well with Ukraine. It took years for Canada to make the decision to start selling arms to Ukraine. And it just took a couple of weeks to give turbines to the Russians. It's wrong on substance”.
“We see the decision as a sign of weakness. It's a very short-sighted decision, and it doesn't provide a long- term solution. It actually doesn't even provide a short-term solution because there's no guarantee that the Russians, even after they get back the turbines, will give oil and gas to Europe. We've seen many times how they've blackmailed Europe, when they've promised something and they don't deliver. They play with the prices and they play with the supplies”.
Germany’s economy ministry says it is considering extending the life of its three remaining nuclear plants, currently slated to be shut down at the end of 2022 as part of former Chancellor Angela Merkel’s pledge to phase out nuclear power. The plants account for 6% of Germany’s electricity production.
Public support for nuclear is said to be rising in the face of a possible cut-off of Russian gas. Bloomberg reports on rising exports of Russian energy to Asia since 2019, not a consequence of the “deterioration of Moscow’s relations with the West” but a sign of a “long-term realignment of energy flows that could be accelerated by the invasion of Ukraine” (Bloomberg notes that Gazprom supplies gas to China from east Siberia, separate from its Europe-bound pipelines).
JULY 17
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
A readout released by the Prime Minister’s Office after the phone call does not mention sanctions nor the release of the turbines. The statement notes the two did discuss the “importance of maintaining strong unity amongst allies and continuing to impose severe costs on Russia in the face of its illegal and unjustifiable invasion of Ukraine”.
Other media reports say that Zelenskyy told Prime Minister Trudeau that Ukrainians “would never accept” Canada's decision to return the Nord Stream 1 turbine because it would encourage more sanctions violations.
JULY 16
Gazprom tweets that on July 15 it “formally approached Siemens with a request to provide documents that, taking into account the current sanction regimes imposed by Canada and the European Union, would be necessary for transferring back to Russia (the required turbine engine)…”
Deputy Prime Minister of Canada Chrystia Freeland confirms she supports the decision to allow the Nord Stream turbines under repair in Montreal to be sent back.
“That was a very difficult decision for Canada and I understand the concern that Ukraine has about it, but it was the right thing to do. Canada is united and determined in our support of the people of Ukraine, we've contributed $3.4 billion in total financial and military support and I'm proud that Canada has led the way in many aspects to support Ukraine and oppose (Russian President) Vladimir Putin.”
The CBC’s Evan Dyer notes that some Ukrainians argue that Canada’s decision is wrong, partly on the basis that there is a pipeline running through Ukraine that could bring Russian gas to Germany.
JULY 15
Opposition MPs demand that senior Liberal ministers appear at a special session of the Standing Committee of Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE) “by July 22, subject to their availability…noting the urgency of the situation”.. to explain Canada's decision to send the repaired turbine(s) back to Germany. The Government is said to agree, saying Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson would be “happy to take questions about the matter”.
The Committee also identifies Ukrainian Ambassador Yulia Kovaliv, German Ambassador Sabine Sparwasser, EU Ambassador Melita Gabrič, and the Ukrainian Canadian Congress as potential witnesses. Conservative foreign affairs critic Michael Chong proposes other potential witnesses, including Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, who Conservative international development critic Garnett Genuis says “has been be completely silent and invisible regarding the government’s decision”. Robert Oliphant, parliamentary secretary to the foreign affairs minister, responds that it is “just simply inappropriate to go on such a fishing expedition”.
JULY 13
Asked on CBC’s Power and Politics if a nuclear re-start in Germany would be a better option than reliance on Russian energy, Minister of Natural Resources Jonathan Wilkinson notes natural gas is used in industrial process applications and for home heating, and it is “just factually wrong” to suggest “starting up a nuclear reactor solves your gas problem”.
“We just announced a whole round of additional sanctions on Russia but the point of sanctions is not to hurt our allies, it is not to crater the German economy… I understand that the Ukrainian government is upset (with the return of the Nord Stream 1 turbines) and I certainly understand why, but I would say that if we, through our actions, splinter the unity of purpose of Europe and North America, we are not helping the Ukrainian cause…”
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the Government of Canada decision to allow Siemens Energy to return the turbines to Gazprom was “difficult” but necessary, given the need to support Germany and other European allies and shore up European energy supplies as they make a transition away from Russian energy sources.
“Canada remains one of the strongest allies and friends to Ukraine (and) we’re not alone: countries in Europe, particularly Germany, have stepped up massively in their support of Ukraine as well, and we need to hold together — particularly (when) faced with the attempts by Russia to weaponize energy policy, to divide us among ourselves.”
Media report that unnamed Global Affairs Canada officials say the Government’s deal to exempt the repaired turbines from sanctions covers a period of up to two years and would allow the import and re- export of up to six units, “a far more extensive arrangement than had previously been disclosed”. The Globe and Mail notes the officials stress the exemption is revocable “at any time”.
“The revenues from gas and oil are directly supporting the Russian military. To waver even for two years, and showing Gazprom can get what it wants, is a dangerous precedent. They are stamping the status quo on weaponizing energy”.
Media report that Russia calls the July 11-21 Nord Stream 1 “routine maintenance” but observers see “the politicization of energy and Russia's desire to cause chaos in Europe in retaliatory response to sanctions” leading to a delay in the reopening, or even an “indefinite closure of the pipeline”.
“Germany and many other European countries are still heavily dependent on energy imports from Russia. A further cut in supply could lead to a host of economic, social and political consequences and wreak havoc on the European economy. How did Germany, a country known for its meticulous planning and engineering, find itself in such a precarious situation?”
Analysts see it as “pretty likely” Russia would shut down beyond the 10-day maintenance stoppage because the pipeline is a “key tool in Russian President Vladimir Putin's arsenal to divide Europe over Ukraine ahead of winter, when the worst effects of a gas shortage would be felt”.
The German economy ministry declines to comment on Gazprom’s July 13 statement that it has no official documentation to show Canada will allow Siemens to ship the repaired turbine, saying only that Siemens was in the planning stage so that transport and deployment can take place as quickly as possible.
“Gazprom does not have a single document to allow Siemens to take out of Canada the gas turbine engine currently being repaired there. In these circumstances, it is not possible to draw an objective conclusion about the development of the situation and ensuring the safe operation of the Portovaya station — a critical facility for the Nord Stream gas pipeline.”
JULY 12
- The Ukrainian World Congress and Ukrainian Canadian Congress have been urging the federal government to reconsider its decision. In a media statement, the UWC says it filed a notice of application for a judicial review of the decision with the Federal Court.
“The application requests a declaration that the decision to provide a permit to Siemens was unreasonable and unauthorized and an order quashing the permit.”
“Canada’s decision to break sanctions and send the Siemens’ turbine back to Russia is a grave mistake with dire consequences. This exemption to the sanctions regime against Russia is totally unacceptable. There are real alternatives to Germany’s gas needs, including buying through Ukraine’s pipeline. We cannot supply a terrorist state with the tools it needs to finance the killing of tens of thousands of innocent people.”
“This is not just about a turbine or possible many turbines to support Russia’s energy exports, this is about continuously succumbing to Russia’s blackmail. This could be Siemens’ moment. People and businesses who believe in freedom, democracy and human rights can and should unite to create breakthrough solutions to the energy crisis Russia has made. We came together to find vaccines to protect ourselves against COVID, we can find ways to protect ourselves from the Kremlin.”
“The decision is, almost explicitly, a surrender to the blackmail of Europe by Vladimir Putin.”
“By releasing a turbine necessary for a Russian pipeline, Canada may help Germany avoid a crippling natural gas shortage, but at the cost of undermining the integrity of its foreign policy.”
JULY 11
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz welcomes Canada’s decision to return the turbine, saying that the energy supply keeps Germany in a position to support Ukraine with humanitarian, financial and military aid.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky calls Canada’s decision “absolutely unacceptable” and warns that Moscow will see it as a “sign of weakness”.
“If a terrorist state can squeeze out such an exception to sanctions, what exceptions will it want tomorrow or the day after tomorrow? This question is very dangerous.”
In a July 10 statement, Ukraine's Foreign Affairs and Energy Ministries express “deep disappointment” in Canada's decision. Kyiv warns that the move would embolden Moscow to keep using its ability to choke off Europe's fuel supplies as a weapon.
“This dangerous precedent violates international solidarity, goes against the principle of the rule of law and will have only one consequence: it will strengthen Moscow's sense of impunity.”
Federal Parliamentarians debate the Government’s decision:
“That is fuelling Putin's war machine that is paying for the missiles raining down on Ukraine.”
“This decision undermines all of that solidarity that so many Canadians have shown right across the country. Support for the democracy in Ukraine, and support for what Ukrainians are living through.”
“No one is going to benefit from having central Europe be in the cold this winter.”
In a statement, the U.S. State Department government says it backs Canada's decision to export the sanctioned equipment, arguing the move will help shore up European energy security.
Media note the turbines will be sent to Germany, whose government will then turn them over to Russia, an “indirect return route (that) could allow Canada to say it hasn't reneged on its sanctions”.
Nord Stream AG announces its maintenance shutdown, with work planned July 11-21.
JULY 10
Keean Nembhard, press secretary to Mr. Wilkinson, confirms that there are six turbines at issue.
Canadians of Ukrainian origin protest the decision on Parliament Hill and outside Montreal's City Hall. Protesters also gather outside Siemens Canada offices in the Montreal suburb of Dorval.
JULY 9
- Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson announces on Twitter that Siemens Canada would be granted a “time-limited and revocable permit” to return the turbines, saying it is necessary to support “Europe's ability to access reliable and affordable energy” as it tries to transition away from reliance on Russian oil and gas.
JULY 8
Media cite an unnamed senior Canadian official who says Canada and Germany are close to a deal that would permit the return of the turbine, and that negotiations include Ukraine, with “all sides working for a positive resolution.”
Steffen Hebestreit, chief spokesperson for German Chancellor Olaf Scholtz, says: “I can confirm that there are positive signals from Canada. I cannot yet confirm that a delivery is on its way.”
The Ukrainian embassy in Ottawa says it hopes Canada will stay committed to full sanctions against Russia.
“We are aware of the dialogue between Canada and Germany regarding the Siemens turbine and do hope that the Government of Canada will ensure full integrity of the current sanctions regime.”
Media note that, in previous years, Russia has compensated for the reduced supply during Nord Stream maintenance by routing more gas via other routes, but “this year it has not done so — at least so far”. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov suggests possibly “boosting" volumes through Nord Stream beginning July 21 - but “only if Canada allows the return of a gas turbine critical to the operation of Nord Stream”.
JULY 7
Germany’s Vice-Chancellor and Economy Minister, Robert Habeck, appeals to Ottawa to release the turbine in order to allow Europe to replenish its gas supplies. He says the return of the turbine to Germany would remove the excuse that Russian President Vladimir Putin has used to slash gas flows to Europe.
Sabine Sparwasser, Germany’s ambassador to Ottawa, says she understands the Trudeau government is under pressure from Ukraine and the Ukrainian-Canadian community not to return the turbine.
Sparwasser notes that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz would lead a trade delegation to Ottawa on August 22-23 and wants to discuss how LNG export facilities on Canada’s East Coast could help Europe replace some of the Russian supply. A German official says Berlin hopes “the turbine dispute can be resolved before the visit”. According someone “familiar with the situation”, Germany expects Canada to send the turbine soon.
“Europe and Germany are very supportive of sanctions … but we also said we should not take sanctions that hurt us more than they hurt Russia.”
“Minister Habeck has called on the Canadian government to allow for the turbine to be released and to be sent to Germany. We don't make this case just for Germany. We make it for a lot of European countries who are still trying to fill their gas supplies in expectation of getting out of Russian gas.”
JULY 5
Media report that Canada’s hopes to see LNG exports to Europe from the East Coast have been “rekindled” by discussions between Chancellor Scholz and Prime Minister Trudeau at the June G-7 summit, as well as renewed interest by Calgary-based Pieridae Energy in its “shelved” Goldboro LNG project in Nova Scotia.
JULY 4
Klaus Mueller, President of Germany's energy regulator, the Federal Network Agency, calls on residents to save energy and prepare for winter as a consequence of reduced gas supply in June.
Germany is reported to be considering amendments to its energy security laws to allow the government to take stakes in utilities and impose a special levy on consumers as a means of passing on soaring energy costs equitably.
German Economy Minister Robert Habeck recently warned of “a Lehman effect” as energy suppliers squeezed by Russia’s reductions “face soaring costs to meet obligations to customers”. In the case of Uniper, the largest buyer of Russian gas in Germany, there have been discussions of a bailout (as a “last resort”) and the government wants to ensure similar rescue measures are available for other companies if required.
JUNE 28
After hosting the G-7 in late June, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz defends the group’s decision to soften commitments on ending public support for fossil fuel investments, saying “the war in Ukraine means time- limited support for new natural gas extraction projects may be necessary”.
JUNE 23
Germany activates the second phase of its three-stage emergency plan for natural gas supplies, warning that Europe's biggest economy faces a “crisis” and storage targets for the winter are at risk after Russia reduced energy deliveries to several countries. German Economy and Energy Minister Robert Habeck says “even if we can’t feel it yet — we are in a gas crisis”. Other countries, including Austria and the Netherlands, have also launched first-stage warnings about supplies and urged people to conserve.
Habeck accuses Moscow of “trying to destroy European unity and the solidarity it has shown with Ukraine”.
JUNE 17
Russia further reduces natural gas to Europe, cutting flows by half to Italy and Slovakia and completely to France, the third day of “significant reductions” already impacting Germany and Austria and spiking already-high energy prices driving record inflation in the European Union.
Russia blames the reductions on a “technical” problem with the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, noting Western sanctions meant equipment being refurbished in Canada was “stuck there”.
Media report on the turbine being “stranded” in the Siemens Energy facility in Montreal under section 9A991 of Canada's Restricted Goods and Technologies List, prohibited from export to “deny Russia access to goods and technology that could benefit their military.”
JUNE 14
Gazprom says natural gas deliveries through Nord Stream 1 to Europe will drop by 40% in 2022 because of the sanctioned turbine. At the time, Germany's Federal Network Agency says it “did not see gas supplies as endangered” and that the reduced flow “aligned with commercial behaviour and Russia's previously announced cut-off of gas to Denmark and the Netherlands”.
MAY
Siemens AG says it is exiting Russia where it has operated for almost 170 years. CEO Roland Busch says, “We condemn the war in Ukraine and have decided to carry out an orderly process to wind down our industrial business activities in Russia.”
APRIL
Media observers note Germany as the biggest European Union buyer of Russian oil and natural gas, “making it the EU's No. 1 financier of Mr. Putin's nasty war and slaughterhouse for civilians”.
MARCH
Media report on how the US is “ramping up” LNG shipments to Europe this year to help the continent phase out reliance on Russian energy. The global effort to wean Europe off Russian energy supplies was “at the center of President Joe Biden's summit with European Union leaders” in March, but a boost in U.S. deliveries only went part of the way in covering the shortfall Europe faces in turning away from Russian gas.
“Eliminating Russian gas will have costs for Europe. But it's not only the right thing to do from a moral standpoint, it's going to put us on a much stronger strategic footing.”
Media report (article paywalled) that the war in Ukraine and the wave of Western sanctions in response is “starting to hit Russia's economic engine: its prodigious oil-and-gas industry”, a sector making up 40% of the country’s budget revenue and employing 1.5M people, risking a “further blow for the beleaguered Russian economy”.
FEBRUARY
After months of build up, Russia begins its invasion of Ukraine.
JANUARY
Media report on the “controversial” and not yet operational Nord Stream 2 pipeline to supply Germany with Russian gas, a project German officials say they are “not above” including on a “menu of retaliatory economic measures against Moscow” because of its threats to Ukraine.
Questions & Answers for Appearance before House Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE)
Nord Stream 1 Gas Pipeline
Q: What is Germany's reliance on Russian gas?
Answer:
- Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February, Germany has reduced its dependence on Russian gas from 55% to 35% as it moves toward energy independence from Russia altogether.
- Germany's gas storage facilities are currently about 64% full as it prepares for winter, and two floating terminals for deliveries of LNG would be ready by the end of the year.
- Germany is doing everything in its power to access additional energy and conserve existing energy to reduce domestic impacts.
Energy Exports and International Energy Security
Q: Given the situation in Europe, and Canada’s current position as a net energy exporter, why isn’t Canada taking steps, either unilaterally or by working with the U.S., to become the energy provider of choice?
Answer:
- Canada is a reliable and responsible provider of energy. As a producer with high environmental and climate standards, Canada is uniquely positioned to provide world energy markets with products that will not only contribute to energy security, but also help economies to decarbonise.
- In response to the ongoing Ukraine crisis and calls from the U.S. and the International Energy Agency, Canada continues to work with provinces and industry to increase energy production to stabilize world energy markets and support allies in their efforts to displace Russian oil and gas.
- We are also in constant contact with our partners in the U.S. to dynamically address energy security and infrastructure questions.
Q: What is Canada doing to support its European allies as they try to transition away from Russian energy?
Answer:
- In March of this year, Canada banned imports of Russian oil, gas and petroleum products in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and most recently, Canada banned professional services that support Russia’s petroleum industry.
- Later that month, I announced that Canadian petroleum producers would increase oil and gas supply by up to 300,000 barrels per day by the end of the 2022 by expanding production and optimizing pipelines - essentially bringing forward production that had been planned for a later time frame. The incremental supply is intended to assist in displacing Russian energy and ease global energy prices.
- We are also assessing our ability to enhance the exports of other key commodities such as potash and uranium.
- We are developing options to increase our capacity to export LNG and hydrogen over the medium to longer term to support the energy security of our allies as they pursue energy transition goals.
Q: Why is Canada not building additional pipelines to eastern Canada to supply energy to Europe?
Answer:
- Canada has a market-based energy policy that relies on the private sector to decide when and where energy projects should be brought forward.
- While there is no project application to build a new west-to-east natural gas or oil pipeline, there are several LNG and hydrogen projects being discussed including:
- A proposal to add potential liquefaction capabilities to a Saint John LNG import facility in New Brunswick;
- Options for a Goldboro LNG project in Nova Scotia; and
- The development of a project in Grassy Point, NL.
- Should such a proposal materialize, federal regulators will provide a fair, timely, and rigorous review process.
Q: Should Canada hit pause on its climate commitments in order to help our allies address energy security concerns?
Answer:
- I have heard arguments that the urgency of the energy security issue means that Canada must set aside concerns and actions relating to climate change.
- Others believe that any move to increase production of fossil fuels should not be pursued given concerns about climate impacts, even to offer aid in times of crisis.
- Neither of these extremes represent tenable positions. I strongly believe that fighting climate change and ensuring energy security can mutually reinforce one another. These challenges and their solutions are linked.
- I believe that we can help our European friends in the short term and still achieve our ambitious and vital climate goals.
Q: How would an emissions cap affect global energy security, given the already high oil and gas prices that have only become more volatile with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine?
Answer:
- The design details of the cap will consider how best to mitigate carbon leakage risks, to avoid exacerbating energy security concerns in the current global context, or undermine North American energy security requirements.
- 90% of Canada’s oil and gas exports go into or through the U.S. for processing, with many also consumed in the U.S.
- As such, Canada’s oil and gas production directly supports energy security in North America and in other countries and helps reduce reliance on imports from OPEC+ countries including Russia.
- We will be considering these issues carefully over the coming months as we develop our approach.
Q: What is the situation with coal-fired plants in Europe right now? Is a renewed reliance on coal happening already – how much?
Answer:
- The EU has announced that existing coal-fired plants may stay in operation longer than expected to ensure energy security in the coming years. Austria, Denmark, France, Italy, and the Netherlands are all reassessing the place of coal in their short-term energy mix to help prepare for future supply shocks.
- However, none of these countries have reversed their climate commitments or their plans to phase out coal by 2030 at the latest.
- The German government passed emergency laws to reopen mothballed coal plants for electricity generation and is auctioning gas supplies to industry to incentivise businesses to curb consumption. This move illustrates the depth of concern in Germany over possible gas shortages in the winter months.
- The level of gas storage in Germany was recently reported to be 64% full, and Germany wants to reach 90% by December. Germany will increase its use of coal to preserve energy supplies ahead of the winter as Russian cuts to gas exports threaten shortfalls in Europe’s largest economy.
- Germany has also triggered phase 2 of its emergency gas plan, and may be forced to introduce constraints on domestic and industrial use.
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Q: What steps is the Government of Canada taking to advance LNG projects in Canada to help European partners reduce their reliance on Russian natural gas that powers their economies, while also respecting Canada’s climate commitments?
Answer:
- Canada is committed to achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement, and meeting our 2050 net zero commitments. Energy security and supply challenges will not take us off course from our efforts to achieve 1.5oC.
- Canada is also ready to directly support European and global energy security by advancing LNG projects.
- Canada has the potential to supply significant volumes of LNG to Europe, from several projects in development in eastern Canada.
- For example, we have spoken with one company to assess the conditions needed to advance its Saint John LNG project in New Brunswick. There are other projects in Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland that could also begin exporting before 2030.
- We are also looking to create energy supply chains that will evolve with time from LNG to lower-carbon fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia, consistent with an energy transition to net zero.
- Our Government has laid out several conditions that LNG projects would have to meet to advance, including: displacement of higher emitting fuels or Russian gas; alignment with Canada’s climate commitments; demonstrating a path to net zero by 2050; and aligning where possible with future exports or use of hydrogen.
- This means that LNG projects will have to meet best-in-class performance standards for emissions intensity, leveraging production techniques like electric drive technology for liquefaction processes, powering facilities with clean electricity, deploying carbon removal technologies, and future proofing investments by adopting hydrogen enabled infrastructure wherever possible to meet Europe’s request for additional sources of clean energy.
Q: Are European prices affecting natural gas prices in Canada? What is the story regarding increased U.S. LNG exports to Europe and the impacts on Canadian NG prices?
Answer:
- As the U.S. exports increasing volumes of LNG, gas prices in North America are becoming more sensitive to global LNG market prices.
- Gas was recently trading around $54 per mmBtu in Europe, which is a four- month high due to reduced flow on the Nord Stream pipeline, and $39 in Asia on July 13th 2022.
- In contrast, North American prices recently dropped from $9 in May to under $6 in July, driven in part by an outage at major U.S. liquefaction terminal — Freeport LNG — which prevented gas from reaching the LNG export market and consequently improved the North American gas supply.
- In the U.S. there is insufficient liquefaction capacity to meet potential demand, and in Europe there is insufficient regasification capacity to match the continent's bold target of increasing imports by 40 million tonnes of LNG in 2022.
Q: What is the status of proposed LNG projects on the east coast? How soon could LNG exports to Europe begin? What role can the Government of Canada play to help advance these projects?
Answer:
- There are several proposed east coast LNG projects that could supply LNG to Europe in the medium- to long-term. Each project is at a different stage of development.
- The most advanced discussion is a proposal to add potential liquefaction capabilities to a Saint John LNG import facility in New Brunswick.
- Another company is examining options for a Goldboro LNG project in Nova Scotia.
- And there are discussions around developing a project in Grassy Point, NL.
- Although the Government of Canada is not open to providing financial support to advance east coast LNG projects, we are prepared to engage with European partners to facilitate discussions around commercial off-take arrangements to help companies to make final investment decisions.
Q: Why advance LNG if Canada is investing in advancing hydrogen development?
Answer:
- Low-carbon fuels such as hydrogen are expected to take time to bring to market at substantial levels. For instance, Japan’s hydrogen strategy aims for hydrogen to compete with LNG on a cost basis by 2050.
- Natural gas can also be used to make hydrogen, and LNG has the potential to be a key feedstock to support global production.
Q: How will industry growth be accommodated under the emissions cap, which will be important for emerging opportunities including hydrogen, LNG, ammonia and petrochemicals?
Answer:
- Investments today in decarbonisation and diversification will position the sector over the medium-term, minimizing future climate-related financial risks for companies, workers and Canadians.
- Governments and industry can work together to make the sector sustainable, support workers and cut emissions, while also leveraging other opportunities.
- For example, Canada ranks in the top 10 globally for ammonia production and produced 3.9 million metric tonnes in 2020. Ammonia is used to carry hydrogen and 90% of ammonia globally is used to make fertilizer.
- Facing severe shortages of fertilizer, countries are turning to Canada for high- quality, reliable fertilizers to displace their reliance on Russian exports.
- Nitrogen fertilizer is produced from natural gas, representing another pressure on the oil and gas sector.
Energy Transition
Q: How will Canada reconcile its pledge to supply an additional 300,000 barrels to global markets consistent with its climate commitments?
Answer:
- Earlier this year, I announced that Canadian oil and gas producers would increase output by up to 300,000 barrels per day (200,000 barrels of oil and 100,000 barrels of oil equivalent of natural gas) by the end of 2022.
- This will be done primarily by pulling forward supply planned to come online in 2023.
- This is intended to assist in displacing Russian energy and ease global energy prices.
- Canada will continue to assess what more we can do to assist our allies, while maintaining our 2030 and 2050 climate commitments.
Q: What is Canada doing longer-term to help our allies address energy security and meet their energy transition goals?
Answer:
- We are assessing options to increase our capacity to export LNG and hydrogen in the medium to longer term to support the energy security of our allies as they pursue energy transition goals.
- Opportunities will also come from new products that enable a low-carbon future – such as electric cars, battery technology, critical minerals, and other clean technologies – and new uses for old products, as we’re seeing with Bitumen Beyond Combustion in Alberta.
- Lastly, there will be opportunities created by increased demand for traditional goods produced in way that emits only ultra low levels of carbon dioxide – such as low-carbon steel and aluminum.
Q: How should we balance the need for government support to transition the oil and gas sector to net zero with commitments to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies?
Answer:
- Canada remains committed to ending new direct public support for fossil fuel production and focusing attention on real, measurable decreases in pollution.
- We have already taken action to phase out eight tax measures supporting the fossil fuel sector.
- This is part of larger effort that will support the transition to a net-zero emissions economy and allow Canada to continue to work with its domestic and international partners to address climate change, while ensuring sustainable, resilient and inclusive global economic development.
Additional Questions & Answers (GAC)
“Recent developments concerning the Nord Stream 1 turbine”
House Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE)
August 4, 2022
Background
- Siemens Energy Canada Limited (Siemens Canada) provides maintenance and technical services on six turbine engines that are critical to the functioning of the Nord Stream 1 pipeline.
- The Nord Stream 1 pipeline is a submarine gas pipeline that transports natural gas through the Baltic Sea, from Vyborg, Russia to Lubmin, Germany. The pipeline is critical to supplying Germany and Europe with natural gas.
- Per contractual obligation, Siemens Canada regularly provides engineering and technical support for the six engines, including maintenance overhaul on each engine. [REDACTED].
- On June 7, 2022, Canada imposed broad prohibitions on the provision of an array of services to Russia related to the oil and gas and chemical industries. As a result, Siemens Canada required a Ministerial permit to continue providing services on the engines that power the Nord Stream 1 pipeline.
- On July 9, 2022, the Minister of Natural Resources announced that Canada had granted a time-limited and revocable permit for Siemens Canada to return the engine that was in Montreal, and to continue providing services on the engines. Siemens has since sent back the turbine that was in Montreal.
- [REDACTED]. Despite this, Russia has continued to leverage its gas supply to create uncertainty. On July 21, 2022, following a stoppage that lasted ten days, Russia resumed gas flows to Germany through Nord Stream 1 at 40 percent capacity. On July 27, Gazprom announced that it would cut gas flows to 20 percent, citing technical reasons that Germany has claimed are illegitimate.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q: Why did Canada grant a permit to Siemens Canada?
- Canada granted a permit to Siemens Canada for three main reasons:
- To remove Russia’s pretexts that Western sanctions were the cause of stoppage of gas shipments to Europe, and to expose Russia for deliberately causing energy instability;
- Canadian sanctions are not designed to hurt our allies. Granting the permit ensured Canada doesn’t stand in the way of German and European energy security, particularly as they continue to reduce their dependence on Russian energy; and,
- To maintain steadfast and long-term allied support for Ukraine.
1. Removing Russia’s pretexts
- Russia has demonstrated its willingness to leverage its oil and gas supplies to sow division, wring concessions, fracture transatlantic unity, and create instability in the global energy markets and global economy.
- Canada must reject the Kremlin’s persistent attempts to divide the international community as we support Ukraine. These include Russian attempts to create mistrust through disinformation and manipulation.
- By granting this permit, Canada has removed an important pretext Russia has been using to renege on its commitment to deliver gas to Germany and Europe.
- Any delays or failures by Russia to live up to their obligations make it clear to the entire world that Moscow is weaponizing its energy for political purposes.
- Through its decision to grant a permit, Canada has clearly shown that Russia bears the sole responsibility for any interruptions of natural gas to European customers.
- Of course, Canada’s decision on the turbine provides no guarantee of Russia’s next steps. It does, however, completely erode Russia’s excuse for withholding gas from Germany and Europe.
- Nevertheless, we can expect Russia to continue coming up with more false and illogical pretexts to deliberately reduce gas flows - irrespective of the state of the pipeline or its engines.
- In doing so, Russia only succeeds in demonstrating to the world that it does not uphold its energy agreements, and that it cannot be trusted.
- Other countries who rely on Russian oil and gas should rethink their dependency: Russia is an unreliable energy supplier who will turn off the taps when it suits them.
- Putin’s energy blackmail has impacted global energy markets. Canada’s decision on the turbine also reflects our efforts with global partners to mitigate price and supply pressures around the world into the medium and long-term.
2. Ensuring Canada doesn’t stand in the way of Germany/Europe’s energy needs
- Canada made this difficult decision following extensive discussions and close engagements with European allies, partners, and international agencies.
- The decision acknowledges German and European commitments and efforts to end their dependency on Russian oil and gas imports following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
- Germany has worked rapidly to reduce its dependence on Russian energy and to broaden its supply base.
- This included cancelling the Nord Stream 2 project, diversifying its supply chains, and asking Norway, Netherlands, Belgium, Qatar and UAE to increase energy deliveries.
- The EU is also working to wean themselves off Russian oil and gas, including through the toughly negotiated 6th sanctions package.
- However, Europe currently relies on the Nord Stream 1 pipeline for almost 40 percent of its natural gas supply; German reliance on Russian natural gas is almost 35 percent.
- Canada decided to grant a permit to Siemens to ensure that Germany and other European countries can continue receiving the gas supply they depend on in the short term, as they make a long-term transition to alternative energy sources.
3. Maintaining allied support for Ukraine
- Canada’s sanctions against Russia are unprecedented in both their scope and their level of coordination with allies.
- These sanctions are aimed at President Putin and his enablers. They are not intended to impact Canada’s allies and are designed to minimize harm to the global economy.
- Our sanctions against Russia, paired with our significant military, humanitarian, and economic aid to Ukraine aim to support Ukraine and its heroic defenders as they fight to defend themselves.
- As Russia continues to wage its war against Ukraine, it will be crucial for Canada and its allies to maintain this united and steadfast support for Ukraine.
- Canada and its allies must find ways to maintain pressure on Russia in the long term, while being prepared to adjust as needed to avoid unintended consequences.
- A refusal to grant a permit would have harmed Germany, the largest donor among EU countries in all forms of direct support to Ukraine and the fourth largest in military support.
- Canada heard very clearly from Germany that without the return of the turbine, the economic repercussions of disrupted gas supply would affect Germany’s ability to sustain support for Ukraine. German officials have since publicly underscored this fact.
- As allies, we must continue to stand together united to jointly increase pressure against Putin.
Q: Why did Siemens need a permit?
- Since February 2022, Canada has repeatedly expanded the scope of its sanctions on Russia, including by designating over 1,200 Russian state-owned entities and influential Russian individuals, prohibiting the exports and imports of a number of goods and technologies, and prohibiting the provision of services to a number of key Russian industries.
- These are the broadest and hardest hitting sanctions Canada has ever levied.
- As a result of Canada’s sanctions, Siemens Canada required a Ministerial permit to continue providing services on the engines that power the Nord Stream 1 pipeline.
- The Special Economic Measures (Russia) Permit Authorization Order authorizes the Minister of Foreign Affairs to grant a permit to authorize specific activities that would otherwise be prohibited by Canada’s sanctions.
- These permits are issued on an exceptional, and case-by-case basis, and applications undergo a rigorous due diligence process before any recommendation is made or decision is taken.
- This process exists to help mitigate against any potential unintended consequences of Canadian sanctions.
Q: What is the process to issue a permit and under what conditions could Canada revoke it?
- The Special Economic Measures (Russia) Permit Authorization Order authorizes the Minister of Foreign Affairs to grant a permit to allow specific activities that would otherwise be prohibited by Canada’s sanctions.
- These permits are issued on an exceptional, case-by-case basis. Extensive due diligence is performed on each permit application to determine its merits.
- If it is determined that it is in the overall best interests of Canada to issue a permit, then one is granted. However, permits usually include a deadline, and can be revoked at any time.
- In the case of the Siemens permit: it expires in two years and can be revoked at any time.
- We decided to limit the Siemens permit to two years, to ensure Siemens can provide refurbishing services as scheduled on each of the engines that powers the pipeline. The two-year limit also gives Germany time to continue finding alternative energy sources.
- On July 21st, following receipt of the turbine that was refurbished in Montreal, Russia restarted gas flows to Germany.
- We are closely watching how this situation evolves. Canada will be ready to act if the situation changes.
Q: What have Canada’s allies said about the decision to return the turbine?
- Canada’s allies have been very supportive of Canada’s decision. They understand that Russia is weaponizing its energy as a tool to divide allies and undermine public support for Ukraine.
- By granting a permit, Canada completely eroded Russia’s excuse for withholding its gas from Germany and other European countries and removed Russia’s pretext for not honouring its contractual obligations. Canada’s allies have also noted this and expressed support for Canada’s decision:
- German Chancellor Scholz has repeatedly expressed Germany’s relief and appreciation for Canada’s decision concerning the Siemens turbines.
- Additionally, just yesterday, German Federal Foreign Minister Baerbock again reiterated Germany’s gratitude for Canada’s support on this issue.
- The U.S. State Department also issued a statement fully supporting Canada’s decision, noting it would help Europe increase its energy security and resilience and counter Russia's efforts to weaponize its energy.
- Finally, the European Commission also welcomed Canada’s decision, also highlighting that Canada removed Russia’s excuse for reducing its gas flows.
Q: Why is Canada weakening its sanctions against Russia?
- Canada’s sanctions are unprecedented both in impact and their level of coordination with international partners. These measures aim to limit Russia’s ability to finance its war and increase international pressure on Russia to change its behaviour.
- To be clear, the objective of Canada’s sanctions regime is to provoke a change of behaviour on the part of President Putin and those who have enabled and supported his war of choice. They are not intended to harm our allies.
- While designing the Special Economic Measures Act and other sanctions regimes, Parliament expressly included the authority to issue permits, because it foresaw that there would be exceptional situations that would require the issuance of a permit to lead activities that would otherwise be prohibited.
- This permit does not in any way represent a weakening of sanctions against Russia.
- By granting this permit, Canada has removed any excuse that Russia has for not fulfilling its commitments to deliver gas to Germany.
- Any delays or failures by Russia to live up to their obligations make it clear to the entire world that Moscow is leveraging its energy for political purposes, is distorting the truth about its war in Ukraine and that Russia is not a reliable energy supplier.
- Canada is steadfast in its support of Ukraine and its people and has contributed $3.4 billion in total financial and military support so far.
- Canada will continue to take action, in unity with its allies and partners, to hold Russia to account and demonstrate that its illegal behaviour will not be tolerated.
Q: Why did Canada allow restricted technology to be sent back to Russia?
- The return of the turbine engines to Russia was not prohibited by Canada’s Restricted Goods and Technologies List.
- Returning the engines to Russia is prohibited through Canada’s services ban under section 3.10 of the Russia Regulations.
- That section prohibits any Canadian or Canadian company from providing an array of services related to key Russian industries, including the oil and gas and chemical industries.
- As a result, Siemens required a permit to continue providing the services that are essential for the functioning of the Nord Stream 1 turbines.
Q: [REDACTED]
- [REDACTED].
- [REDACTED].
Q: Why can’t you share the details of the permit? Why was Gazprom provided the details?
- Global Affairs Canada only releases permits to the permit applicant or their authorized recipient/legal counsel. This is done in order to protect sensitive information such as personal information and commercially confidential information. Once granted, it is up to the applicant to determine what, if any, information they wish to divulge.
- In that regard, I thank Siemens for agreeing to release the details of the permit which I am prepared to share with this committee.
- On Gazprom, as noted, Siemens determines with whom they share the permit. As part of processing the delivery of the turbine, I understand that Gazprom insisted that Siemens Canada provide a copy of the permit. I would defer to the company for any further details on this point.
Q: What can you tell us about the judicial review?
- We can confirm that the Ukrainian World Congress and Mr. Daniel Bilak have brought an application for judicial review challenging the decision to issue a permit to Siemens Canada under the Special Economic Measures (Russia) Permit Authorization Order.
- The Attorney General of Canada is currently reviewing the application and will file its responding materials in due course and as required by Federal Court Rules.
Q: What is Canada doing to ensure global energy security?
- In the short term, Canada is committed to supporting global market stability by increasing domestic supply of low carbon oil and gas and exporting, via existing infrastructure.
- Canada will be increasing its production of oil and gas of up to 300,000 barrels per day by the end of 2022, primarily by pulling forward supply expected to come online in 2023.
- This is intended to assist in displacing Russian energy and in easing global energy prices, without increasing global emissions.
- Over the medium-to-long term, Canada can provide LNG from both coasts, as well as hydrogen when demand warrants. Discussions are ongoing in Canada with industry and regulators to look at the potential to increase energy supply and exports of key minerals to the international markets.
- Additionally, Canada continues to monitor the energy supply situation with partners at the International Energy Agency.
- Going forward, to help reduce reliance on fossil fuels, diversify global energy markets, and support sustainable social and economic development, Canada will work with other like-minded countries to:
- urge other countries to reduce their reliance on Russian energy;
- strengthen critical supply chains of energy commodities, critical minerals and rare earth elements;
- ensure the sustainability and affordability of these supplies; and
- support the global net-zero transformation.
Q: Ukraine has publicly indicated that it has alternative pipelines that could accommodate similar volumes of gas to Nord Stream 1. Why didn’t Canada consider this option?
- We did consider this option.
- From a technical perspective, the sum of gas transported by three Ukrainian pipelines could be similar to that which is transported through Nord Stream 1.
- However, we deemed this option to be unviable under the current conditions, as Russia continues to wage its war.
- Furthermore, even if the gas were transported through Ukrainian pipelines, Russia would still be the exporter. As such, Russia would still profit from its exports of natural gas, regardless of the route or pipeline used.
- Ultimately, we determined that using Ukrainian pipelines instead of Nord Stream 1 would only hand Russia further excuses to slow its gas exports and come up with additional pretexts to deliberately create energy instability.
Q: Why isn’t Siemens speaking up about the situation, to counter Russian misinformation?
- We cannot speak on behalf of the company.
- Questions about Siemens should be directed to Siemens.
Q. If Russia continues to restrict gas flow, even after the return of this turbine, will Canada continue to allow additional turbines to come to Canada for repair?
- We continue to carefully monitor the situation and we will not fall into Putin’s trap of sowing disunity between Canada and its allies.
Q. You say the turbines are not restricted technology. Why then are they NOT on the Restricted Goods and Technology List (RGTL)?
- As with all of our sanctions, we are working closely with our partners and allies to ensure our sanctions have maximum effect.
- In this regard, the RGTL harmonizes our approach with that of our allies. Any items that are on that list were collectively deemed to be significant by Canada and its allies, in terms of contribution to Russia’s military capacity.
Q. [REDACTED]
- [REDACTED].
Q. When are the next ones coming?
- While no specific date has yet been set for another turbine to arrive, we understand that five additional turbines are scheduled for maintenance over the course of the next 2 years.
- Date modified: