Language selection

Search

Gender equality and empowerment measurement tool Part 2: Facilitator’s guide

PDF Version (7.61 MB)

On this page

In this guide, we provide information and step-by-step instructions for using the GEM Tool. As a facilitator, your objective is to collect and report data on a project’s gender equality and empowerment results during one or more guided focus group discussions with project participants (held in person or online). This process can be supplemented by additional data collection through interviews with local project partners.

The GEM Tool can be conducted with women participants and with other genders (e.g., men, transgender, non-binary, etc.) in separate or mixed focus group settings (see Box 2.1). The instructions below have been written with women participants in mind, but all of the same steps in the GEM Tool process can be followed regardless of the gender of focus group participants. However, you will need to adapt how you frame questions so that, for example, you are not asking men participants to speak about their own feelings and experiences of empowerment resulting from the project, but rather, their observations on the empowerment of women or other genders in their household or community.

Ultimately, the number and composition of focus groups and interviews that you choose to facilitate will depend on the goals of the data collection, the local and project context in which you are applying the tool, and the time and resources that are available. For example, you may wish to conduct 3-5 in-person focus group sessions with 8-10 participants each, plus 3-5 interviews with local project partners.

Box 2.1: Considerations for facilitating separate versus mixed-gender focus groups

Whenever possible, collecting data from different genders is important to effectively apply an intersectional lens. In most cases, when using the GEM Tool we recommend conducting separate focus group discussions for individuals with different genders (i.e. women, men, transgender, non-binary, etc.). This will help to ensure more open, comfortable and safe discussions because of the way that societies are traditionally structured along gendered lines. Having separate focus groups for different genders can also be used to identify and compare gendered views and experiences, and to measure gender gaps in project results.

However, mixed-gender focus groups can make a valuable contribution to understanding and knowledge about a project’s gender equality and empowerment results. Diversity among participants can reveal multiple perspectives and ideas, and interactions can lead to richer conversations and insights that might not have emerged otherwise.

Whether you decide to host separate or mixed-gender focus groups, local gendered power dynamics need to be understood and accounted for in the make-up and facilitation of focus group discussions using the GEM Tool. Ensuring participants’ safety, comfort and confidentiality should always be your top priority as a facilitator.

The information, definitions and examples provided below are meant to serve as a guide and should be modified to fit the socio-cultural context of the focus group participants and setting as needed. As you review the information in this guide, take notes and consider instances where you might need to modify the language or examples used. You can also refer back to the information and resources provided in Part 1: Training Guide to help you apply a feminist methodology and approach for each step of the GEM Tool data collection process.

Introduction to the GEM Tool

The GEM Tool (shown in Figure 1 below)is a standardized tool for data collection and information gathering on the gender equality and empowerment results of development projects. It is used to collect data from project participants during one or more focus group discussions held in person or online.

It is focused on five key categories of empowerment: economic, knowledge, physical security, self-confidence and social. These categories cover important and widely recognized aspects of women’s empowerment and are provided to offer some standardization in data collection across focus groups and projects using the GEM Tool. The guidance below includes examples and terminology for each category that should be modified to suit the local and project context. These categories can also be replaced with any others that you deem more appropriate for the local and project setting that you’re working in.

Figure 1: Blank GEM Tool

Our Gender Equality and Empowerment Journey

What does gender equality and empowerment look like?

  • Participants will add their ideas to this portion of the template
  • Participants will review comments and place a number to indicate the Gender Impact rating scale

Gender Impact Rating Scale

No gender impact: 0
Negative gender impacts: 1
Mixed gender impacts: 2
Positive gender impacts: 3

EconomicKnowledgePhysical SecuritySelf-ConfidenceSocial
Participants add their felt impacts hereParticipants add their felt impacts hereParticipants add their felt impacts hereParticipants add their felt impacts hereParticipants add their felt impacts here
Barriers and supports for empowerment
BarriersSupports
Participants add their perceptions of barriers hereParticipants add their perceptions of supports here

What this tool can do:

Therefore, this tool is about capturing the rich details of participants’ self-defined experiences of gender equality and empowerment, and tracking the barriers and supports that either hindered or contributed to a particular result.

What this tool is not designed to do:

In-person or online data collection

As mentioned, the GEM Tool can be used for in-person and online data collection. Unless otherwise stated, the facilitator should use all steps in this guide regardless of the data collection approach (online or in person).

Overview of the focus group discussion process

Focus groups conducted using the GEM Tool are divided into eight steps, each with their own objectives, activities, and time allocation. In total, the focus group session will last approximately 2.5 hours, and will follow this general structure and process:

Step 1: Open the discussion (20 minutes)
Step 2: Revisiting the project activities and objectives (5 minutes)
Step 3: Discussion on “what does gender equality and empowerment look like?” (15 minutes)
Step 4: Documenting the project’s gender equality and empowerment results (50 minutes)

Break (10 minutes)

Step 5: Rating the gender impact for each category of empowerment (20 minutes)
Step 6: Identifying barriers and supports for empowerment (15 minutes)
Step 7: Validating the findings with participants (10 minutes)
Step 8: Thanking participants and closing the discussion (5 minutes)

Supplies needed:

In person

Online

Tip: Digital interactive whiteboard tools can be great resources for facilitating online discussions, if you are familiar with how to use them. Many of these tools are also free and participants do not require an account to access them. Consider using one of these tools during your focus group if appropriate for the local context and participants.

Preparing for the focus group discussion

As you begin to plan for your focus group discussions, be sure to reflect on the composition of your research team (e.g., gender, local expertise, languages spoken) to determine the best way forward for data collection. See Part 1: Training Guide for some considerations on the role of the facilitator and research team in data collection using the GEM Tool.

Once your research team is established, complete the following tasks to prepare for your focus group discussions: 

Review project information and materials

Take some time to read over available information and materials on the project. Understanding the project activities and objectives will help you to be a more effective facilitator, and enable you to remind focus group participants about their involvement in the project. If a project ended several months ago, or if some participants have been involved in multiple projects by different organizations, you may need to refresh their memory about this project.

Coordinate with local project partners

You will need to work closely with local project partners to identify participants and a suitable location to host the focus group sessions. One of these partners may be able to provide space in their office, or recommend alternative locations that provide the necessary privacy, accessibility and accommodations (e.g. use of washrooms, moveable tables and chairs, etc.).

To ensure a manageable discussion, the ideal number of focus group participants is 8-10 for in person, and 3-5 for online. It can be more difficult and more time consuming to effectively facilitate online focus group discussions, so smaller participant numbers are recommended. However, depending on the specific context and participants, online focus groups might be the best option (e.g., to ensure the safety of participants due to COVID-19 or other health crises, or where participants are spread out across large distances).

Work with local partners to generate a list of project participants who can participate in the focus group sessions, including appropriate contact details (such as phone numbers or email addresses) and any demographic information available (i.e., age, gender, marital status, disability, location, languages spoken, etc.). Request/generate a larger sample of participants than required for completing the focus groups so that you can strive for participants with diverse backgrounds and experiences to ensure intersectional data collection. This includes participants who may have experienced different barriers or forms of marginalization with respect to their participation in the project.

Tip: In some contexts, requesting contact information for participants may be met with suspicion (especially in areas with histories of surveillance), while in others this may be common practice. Discuss with local project partners what is an appropriate method for communicating with participants.

Finally, consult with your research team members and local project partners to tailor the GEM Tool as needed (e.g., empowerment categories, definitions, examples, etc.) to suit the socio-cultural context of the focus group participants and setting, as well as the specific project objectives and activities.

Online: identify a strategy for online data collection

If you are limited to online data collection for any reason (e.g., COVID-19 travel or gathering restrictions, participants are spread across large distances, etc.), use your knowledge of the local context, or ask research team members or local project partners for help identifying an online video conferencing platform (e.g., Zoom, Skype, WhatsApp, etc.) that is appropriate to use for hosting virtual focus groups. You can also reach out to participants once they have been identified and consult with them on their preferred platform. There is no one platform that can be recommended for all contexts, it depends upon participants’ preferences, familiarity, comfort level and access.

Keep in mind that online data collection can increase accessibility and participation for some groups, while excluding others.

In person: Prepare your GEM Tool poster or flipchart

If you are conducting your focus group in person, you will need to prepare your GEM Tool using poster board or flipchart paper. Your GEM Tool should include all of the components shown in Figure 1 above (modified as needed).

An important part of this process is to review the different categories of empowerment in the GEM Tool to make sure that they are appropriate for the local and project context. Think through each category and the types of descriptions and examples that you could use in your discussion with participants. See Step 4 below for more information on this.

Remember your feminist research training.

The GEM Tool is not an inherently feminist tool – it should be applied using a feminist methodology and approach. Refer back to Part 1: Training Guide for a reminder of the role of the facilitator and research team in feminist data collection.

Step-by-Step instructions for using the GEM Tool

Step 1: Open the Discussion

Time allotted: 20 minutes

Taking time to open the focus group session properly is important for establishing rapport and ensuring the comfort and safety of participants. During this step you will have a chance to facilitate introductions, obtain informed consent from participants, co-create ground rules for the discussion, and conduct an icebreaker activity. These four activities should take approximately five minutes each.

Introduction

Begin by introducing yourself and clarifying the purpose and goal of the focus group discussion. If you other research team members are present to work as note-takers or translators, introduce them and their role as well.

Obtain informed consent

Before proceeding further, informed consent should be sought and obtained from all focus group participants. This includes their consent for participating in the focus group, as well as optional protocols like audio recording the discussion.

You can download and modify a copy of the informed consent script (below), or create your own using this one as a guide.

Co-creating ground rules for the discussion

Working with participants, identify and agree together on a list of ground rules to ensure a safe, inclusive and meaningful discussion. Begin by asking the participants what ground rules are important for them. Here are some examples to keep in mind:

For in-person discussions, write these rules out on a poster or flip chat and hang it on the wall.

For online discussions, type out these rules and paste them into the chat function of the meeting platform (if available).

Icebreaker activity

After introducing yourself and the purpose of the focus group, facilitate an icebreaker activity to help participants feel more comfortable communicating with each other, to energize the group, and to set-up the discussion. As a facilitator, the secret of a successful icebreaker activity is to keep it simple: design the activity with specific objectives in mind and make sure that the session is appropriate and comfortable for everyone involved.

Some examples of possible icebreaker activities and questions are provided below. You can use these, or come up with your own icebreaker that is more appropriate for the local context and participants. Keep timing in mind, and stick to ice breakers that can be completed in about 5 minutes.

In person

Online

Step 2: Revisiting the project activities and objectives

Time allotted: 5 minutes

Take a moment to remind participants of the project activities and objectives. Briefly describe what their participation in the project involved. Ask if there are any questions before proceeding.

Step 3: Discussion on “what does gender equality and empowerment look like?”

Time allotted: 15 minutes

Begin by explaining that you want to talk about the participants’ gender equality and empowerment journey during this project. Ask participants to think about “What gender equality and empowerment look like in their household or community?”

Depending on the setting and background of the participants, this question might be unclear and need to be modified or rephrased. Use your knowledge of the local context and participants to ask additional probing questions or frame the question in a more appropriate way. Some examples include:

In-person

Online

Step 4: Documenting the project’s gender equality and empowerment results

Time allotted: 50 minutes

The GEM Tool uses different categories to determine how the project contributed to participants’ feelings and experiences of empowerment (positively or negatively). These categories aim to generate discussion on specific pathways for empowerment in the context of participants’ lives. They span five different domains or categories: economic, knowledge, physical security, self-confidence and social.

These categories are meant to serve as guides and should be modified to fit the socio-cultural context of the focus group participants and setting, as well as the specific project activities. See Box 2.2 for a description of these different categories, and for other possible names, concepts, definitions and examples that you can use in your discussion with participants.

Box 2.2: Categories of empowerment in the GEM Tool

Economic: Participants have more access to and control over resources like income, credit, land or property. For example, a participant can own the land where her family’s house sits, open her own bank account, or make decisions about household spending without consulting her husband/father.

Related terms and concepts include: access to and control over resources, economic agency, financial inclusion and financial security.

Knowledge: Participants feel that they have new knowledge or skills that can help them achieve their goals. For example, participants attended information sessions or workshops, or took a course at a college or university to improve their knowledge. They are now using this new knowledge or skills and believe this has been beneficial.

Related terms and concepts include: capacity building, and education, knowledge or skills acquisition.

Physical Security: Participants express having more control over their body and feel secure. They control where they go and what happens to them. They have access to the resources and services they need to take care of their health and wellbeing. For example, participants feel that they can choose to wear certain clothes, travel to certain places on their own, or decide on the number of children they want.

Related terms and concepts include: bodily autonomy, freedom from violence, human security, mobility, safety, wellbeing and wellness.

Self-Confidence: Participants feel like they have gained self-confidence and trust in their ability to make decisions about their lives. They believe in themselves and feel more capable of expressing their views and concerns with others. For example, participants believe they can achieve a personal goal, or feel better able to voice their opinions with others in their household or community, or when running their business.

Related terms and concepts include: agency, assertiveness, autonomy, self-efficacy, self-esteem, speaking up and voice.

Social: Participants observe positive changes in their relationships and networks. They feel more connected in their community, and experience more respect with and for others. For example, participants have become members of a network, organization, or group, or they feel as though they are recognized and respected by their neighbours.

Related terms and concepts include: collaboration, networks, relationship building, reputation, respect from others, social capital, social status and social standing.

Explain to participants that you will now be discussing how the project may or may not have contributed to their feelings and experiences of empowerment in different areas of their lives.  Start by introducing the first category of empowerment that you will be discussing. Provide the definition and some examples of impacts for this category that are appropriate for the local and project context. Ask participants to provide other examples of the types of impacts that might fit under this category.

Next, ask participants: “Has the project impacted your experiences of empowerment in this category (positively or negatively)? If so, can you provide an example?”.

In-person

Online

Tip: During this step, some participants may share negative or triggering experiences that resulted from the project. Being prepared with information for local support services and resources to share with participants is a best practice. This could include, for example, gender-based violence services like counseling, health services, legal services, anti-trafficking services, etc. Consulting with local networks, organizations and partners is often the best way to identify these resources.

Additional probing questions

If participants are having trouble understanding any category, or if the discussion is lagging, consider posing some additional probing questions. Here are some examples of possible questions for each category, which should be modified and tailored for the local and project context.

Economic

Knowledge

Physical Security

Self-Confidence

Social

Identifying any additional empowerment categories

Some gender equality and empowerment impacts may not fit neatly within the five predetermined categories of the GEM Tool. Before moving on to the next step, ask participants:

If additional categories and/or examples are identified, add these to the GEM Tool.

For in-person discussion, write the name of any newly identified categories on a blank piece of flipchart paper and add it to the wall next to the other categories.

For online discussions, take detailed notes of any new categories or examples.

At the end of this step, allow participants to comment further through an open question: “Would anyone like to add anything else to this before we move on?” Add any final responses to the GEM Tool.

Take a Break

Take a 10 minute break to allow participants to attend to any personal matters or to have refreshments.

Step 5: Rating the gender impact for each category of empowerment

Time allotted: 20 minutes

Start by reminding the participants of your discussions before the break about the different categories of empowerment and explain that they are about to be asked to rate how impactful the project was for each category.

Explain that projects might have led to no gender impacts, negative gender impacts, mixed gender impacts, or positive gender impacts in their own lives; and that these are the ratings from which they will choose (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Gender Impact Rating Options

No gender impacts: 0
Negative gender impacts: 1
Mixed gender impacts:2
Positive gender impacts:3

Explain the rating scale and what the different colours mean using the following definitions, and by providing examples where possible from earlier discussions (for additional examples see Box 2.3):

Box 2.3: Examples of positive, mixed and negative gender impacts

Economic: Positive gender impacts in the economic empowerment category could include increased access to and control over resources like income, credit, land, or property. For example, a participant can own the land where her family’s house sits, open her own bank account, or make decisions about household spending without consulting her husband or father. Mixed impacts in this category could involve examples of both positive and negative experiences. For example, participants may describe having greater access to income but no change to the control over that income and how money is spent. Negative impacts could include examples of failed businesses.

Knowledge: Positive gender impacts in the knowledge category could include participants feeling they have new knowledge or skills that can help them achieve their goals. For example, participants attended information sessions or workshops, or took a course at a college or university to improve their knowledge. They are now using this new knowledge or skills and believe this has been beneficial. Mixed impacts in this category could include examples of increased education which may be valued on its own but few opportunities to use this education to improve their quality of life. Negative impacts could include not having access to the knowledge, skills or education needed to succeed in their projects.

Physical Security: Positive gender impacts in the physical security category could indicate that participants can have more control over their body and feel more physically secure. For example, they may have greater control over their physical movements or ability to take public transit. Mixed impacts in this category could refers to experiences of increased control, such as their ability to take the bus, but ongoing discrimination when using public transit. Negative impacts could include examples of reduced decision-making power in terms of sexual and reproductive health decisions.

Self-Confidence: Positive gender impacts in the self-confidence category could include participants feeling like they have gained self-confidence and trust in their ability to make decisions about their lives. They believe in themselves and feel more capable of expressing their views and concerns with others. For example, participants believe they can achieve a personal goal, or feel better able to voice their opinions with others in their household or community, or when running their business. Mixed impacts in this category could include increased self-confidence in their household but ongoing discrimination within their community which limits opportunities. Negative impacts could include feelings of self-doubt or regret for decisions made during the project.

Social: Positive gender impacts for the social empowerment category could include improved relationships and networks. Participants feel more connected in their community, and experience more respect with and for others. Mixed impacts in this category could include a combination of improved networks among women in the community but ongoing discrimination from men in the community. Negative impacts could include feeling more marginalized in their homes or communities as a result of their participation in a project.

Confirm that participants understand the difference between these different ratings and ask if there are any questions before proceeding.

In person

Online

Step 6: Identifying barriers and supports for empowerment

Time allotted: 15 minutes

In this step, you will have an open discussion with participants to identify barriers and support for their empowerment in the project environment. Even in the context of a development project, changes to participants’ feelings and experiences of empowerment do not happen in a vacuum. There are external factors operating at the individual, household, community and structural levels that can either hinder or contribute to those changes.

Start by discussing supportive elements in the project environment that contributed to participants' feelings or experiences of empowerment. Some supportive elements may have been highlighted in the previous activity so you can remind participants of those examples before turning to these possible discussion questions:

Individual-level supports

Household-level supports

Community-level supports

Structural supports

Wrap-up question (on intersectionality)

In-person

Online

Next, ask about barriers to empowerment in the project environment. Some barriers or challenges may have been highlighted in the previous activity so you can remind participants of those examples before turning to these possible discussion questions:

Individual-level barriers

Household-level barriers

Community-level barriers

Structural barriers

Wrap-up question (on recommendations)

In-person

Online

Step 7: Validating the findings with participants

Time allotted: 10 minutes

Validating your findings with the participants serves three valuable roles:

  1. It confirms what participants have said and that their perspectives and experiences  have been captured accurately.
  2. It ensures that participants are actively engaged in the process of identifying broader themes and insights emerging from the discussion.
  3. It recognizes the value of participants’ contributions to shaping and strengthening development programming in the region.

One way of validating findings with participants is to share what you heard from the discussion, highlighting some of the main points, examples and takeaways, and asking if your observations are accurate or not, and if others wish to add anything. This approach is especially useful if you are short on time.

Another way of validating findings is to facilitate group reflection on the broader themes emerging from the discussion. Ask participants to reflect on the discussion that has taken place and what they see represented on the GEM Tool poster/flipchart. Some guiding questions can include:

Online

Step 8: Thanking participants and closing the discussion

Time allotted: 5 minutes

Thank the participants for their contributions to the focus group discussion. If you are offering any vouchers for transportation or stipends for participation, let participants know how they can collect them.

If you will be sending a copy of the final report to interested participants, collect any information that you need in order to do so (e.g., email address, physical mailing address).

In person

Online

After the focus group discussion

Write-up your findings

Transfer the information that you have gathered from the focus group discussions into a final report. You can use the outline provided to you in Part 3: Reporting Guide as a template or for inspiration.

Additional data collection activity

Interviews with local project partners

After the focus group discussions, you may have the opportunity to conduct interviews with local project partners (e.g. implementing partner staff, project managers, etc.). The goal of these interviews is to gain additional information, insight and/or clarification about a project’s gender equality and empowerment results. These interviews can also be used to identify barriers and support for those results in the project environment, as well as opportunities or lessons learned for promoting gender equality and empowerment goals.

You can download and modify a copy of the partner staff interview guide (below), or create your own using this one as a guide.

Related Tools

Gender equality and empowerment measurement tool informed consent script

Thank you for being here today. I would like to take a few minutes to ensure that you understand the purpose of this focus group session, what your participation involves, and how we will use the information that you provide today. If you do not understand something, please raise your hand at any point. I welcome all questions.

Your participation today will involve a group discussion lasting two and a half hours. The purpose of this discussion is to learn about your gender equality and empowerment journey during this project, and to understand how [organization] can improve its work promoting gender equality and empowerment in this region.

I am working with [organization] to collect this information. A final report based on this discussion will be developed and shared with [audience]. You will also be provided with a copy of the findings of this report. It will be shared with you by [outline the process]. The information collected will not be used to make decisions about future funding or to determine whether this project should continue.

The information that you share will be kept confidential and your name will not appear in any report or publication produced from this discussion. However, please keep in mind when considering your responses that the other participants in the focus group will know what you have said during the discussion. Similarly, given the group format of this session, I ask that you respect each other’s right to privacy by not discussing what is talked about here with people outside of the focus group.

If audio recording

Our discussion today will be audio recorded for accuracy and analysis purposes. I will also take notes, but I will not put names next to comments provided. The recording and any notes that are taken during the session will be kept in a secure location that only I have access to. I will let you know when I start to record.

For online discussions

Our discussion today on (Teams, Zoom, Skype, Whatsapp, etc.) is a new way of holding conversations of this kind. Please know that I will do everything I can to protect your privacy using this technology. Our discussion will be audio recorded for accuracy and analysis purposes.  I will also take notes, but I will not attribute names to any comments. The recording and any notes that are taken during the session will be kept in a secure location that only I have access to. I will let you know when I start to record.

Your participation in this discussion is entirely voluntary. If you feel uncomfortable at any point, please feel free to step outside and take a break, or to withdraw from the session entirely by communicating this to me or one of my team members here today. If you withdraw, we will not include your responses in the report. You can also choose not to respond to any question that you prefer not to answer. Your decision to not answer some questions or to withdraw from the session, for any reason, will have no negative consequences.

If providing a stipend or a voucher

You will receive [amount] for participating in today’s session, to help cover any expenses associated with being here today. You will receive this amount even if you choose to leave the session at any point. 

Are there any questions?

Based on this information, do you agree to participate in this discussion? If so, please raise your hand.

If anyone wishes not to participate, I invite you to leave at this time, and you will not be judged for this.

If audio recording

I will now start to record the discussion.

Gender equality and empowerment measurement tool project partner interview guide

If you are conducting interviews with local project partners, you can use the questions below as a guide or for inspiration to develop your own list of questions that suit the project context and setting.

The suggested length for these interviews, based on the list of questions below, is approximately one hour.

Interview Guide

Introduction

Thank you for meeting with me today. The objective of this interview is to better understand the women’s empowerment and gender equality results of this project, including the associated opportunities and challenges for ensuring long-term gender-transformative impacts. I have some questions for you along these lines. 

Informed consent

Before we begin. Can I audio record our conversation solely for note taking purposes?

Do you have any questions for me?

Do you agree to participate in this interview?

Questions
  1. Can you start by telling me briefly about your position at [organization] and your role in this project?

Defining women’s empowerment and gender equality

  1. What are some of the forms of gender inequality that are prevalent in this region?
  1. Can you describe some of the challenges of working to promote women’s empowerment and gender equality in this context?

Women’s empowerment and gender equality project results

  1. Can you describe whether and how women’s empowerment and gender equality goals have been integrated into this project?
  1. To what extent were intersectional considerations such as age, ethnicity, religion, etc. incorporated into the project's design and implementation?
  1. What have been the most noteworthy women’s empowerment and gender equality results of this project? Could you provide examples?
  1. Which elements of the project were the most important for achieving these results and why?
  1. In your opinion, how sustainable are these results?
  1. Did this project have any unintended negative impacts for women’s empowerment and gender equality? Could you provide examples? What lessons can be learned from these instances?

Validating and clarifying focus group information

  1. Use this question to gather additional insights about what you heard during the focus groups with project participants, and to seek clarification on any aspects of the project that remain unclear.
Conclusion

Is there anything else that you would like to add before we end our conversation?

Thank you for your time.

I will be sure to share a copy of the final report with you once it is available. (confirm email address or preferred delivery method)

After the interview is complete

Related links

Report a problem on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, please contact us.

Date modified: